On 11/18/20 3:55 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
I think it's also needed for an efficient null element check in
List::copyOf. I have a hunch that with the posted implementation, it
would incorrectly produce an immutable list that contains null
elements.
(Sorry for the delay; oddly, this comment didn't make it into the PR.)
Yes, there was a bug in List::copyOf in that it would pass through a list containing
nulls, a clear violation of its spec. I fixed this in my second-most recent commit
on this PR.
s'marks
