On Tue, 1 Dec 2020 21:58:16 GMT, Calvin Cheung <cche...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Please review this change which includes:
>> 
>> - If the `jdk.internal.lambda.disableEagerInitialization`property is 
>> enabled, the `InnerClassLambdaMetafactory` will not involve CDS to archive 
>> lambda proxy classes or to find them from an archive.
>> 
>> - Not passing the `initialize` (same as `!disableEagerInitialization`) to 
>> `LambdaProxyClassArchive.find` and eventually to the 
>> `JVM_LookupLambdaProxyClassFromArchive` function.
>> 
>> Testing:
>> 
>> - [x] all cds/appcds tests locally on linux-x64
>> 
>> - [x] tiers 1 - 4 (in progress)
>
> Calvin Cheung has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
> commit since the last revision:
> 
>   added a test

test/hotspot/jtreg/runtime/cds/appcds/LambdaEagerInit.java line 36:

> 34:  * @requires vm.cds
> 35:  * @library /test/lib /test/hotspot/jtreg/runtime/cds/appcds
> 36:  * @compile 
> ../../../../../jdk/java/lang/invoke/lambda/LambdaEagerInitTest.java

I think it's better to make a copy of this test along side with this test.

test/hotspot/jtreg/runtime/cds/appcds/LambdaEagerInit.java line 77:

> 75:               .shouldHaveExitValue(0);
> 76: 
> 77:         // run with archive without the 
> -Djdk.internal.lambda.disableEagerInitialization=true property

Minor suggestion: make this test case in a separate 
`testWithEagerInitializationEnabled` method.   `testImpl` can be renamed to 
`testWithEagerInitializationDisabled`.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/1542

Reply via email to