On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 18:28:54 GMT, Lance Andersen <lan...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Please review this small verbiage change to specify clearly the behavior of >> `Reader::read(char[] cbuf)` when the length of `cbuf` is zero, and that of >> `Reader::read(char[] cbuf, int off, int len)` when `len` is zero. > > Hi Brian, > > Are there existing tests that cover the behavior described in the proposed > change? Hi @LanceAndersen. I don't see any tests specific to this issue, but then there are ten Reader classes in `java.io`, seven of which are not abstract. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/1737
