On Fri, 12 Feb 2021 15:22:15 GMT, Roger Riggs <rri...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> > > The table is informative and should not be construed as specification. > The wording "has supported" should be sufficient. If this is not specification then doesn't that imply that any provider of any version of OpenJDK would be free to support, or not, whatever version of Unicode that they chose? Surely a minimum supported version must be part of the platform specification? ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/2538
