On Thu, 18 Feb 2021 03:56:49 GMT, David Holmes <dhol...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> The table is informative and should not be construed as specification. >> The wording "has supported" should be sufficient. > >> >> >> The table is informative and should not be construed as specification. >> The wording "has supported" should be sufficient. > > If this is not specification then doesn't that imply that any provider of any > version of OpenJDK would be free to support, or not, whatever version of > Unicode that they chose? Surely a minimum supported version must be part of > the platform specification? The current version of Unicode is specified in a normative statement just before the table. "Character information is based on the Unicode Standard, version 13.0." The table is not a specification of past revisions. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/2538
