On Tue, 23 Feb 2021 12:10:30 GMT, Evan Whelan <ewhe...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Does the new version of the test still occasionally catches the issue and >> fails if the fix is not present? > > Hi, locally this test reproduces the issue on my Windows machine. > > I believe our internal testing Windows boxes are too powerful and handle the > threading too efficiently to reproduce this error. > > I can reproduce locally approx 10% of the time, but after over 100 runs I > cannot reproduce as part of our internal testing. > > As this is not verifiable in a completely deterministic way, I believe having > the test as a stable, passing test is a more appropriate approach instead of > selecting this as no-reg hard. > > It adds more test coverage to the code also. Reproducing locally with the test is fine. That's enough for me. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/2572
