On Sat, 1 May 2021 04:04:17 GMT, Alexander Matveev <almat...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> jpackage should specify architecture for produced PKG files via 
>> hostArchitectures="x86_x64 or arm64". aarch64 installer will be installable 
>> on x64 without specifying hostArchitectures which is not correct and if 
>> install on arm Mac it will request Rosetta 2. With proposed fix by setting 
>> hostArchitectures="x86_x64" if installer contains x64 binaries, it will be 
>> installable on x64 Mac and will require Rosetta 2 on arm Mac. 
>> hostArchitectures will be set to arm64 if installer contain aarch64 binaries 
>> and will gave error when run on x64 Mac and will be installable on arm Mac 
>> without triggering installation of Rosetta 2.
>
> Alexander Matveev has updated the pull request incrementally with one 
> additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   8266179: [macos] jpackage should specify architecture for produced pkg 
> files [v2]

Changes requested by asemenyuk (Reviewer).

test/jdk/tools/jpackage/macosx/HostArchPkgTest.java line 55:

> 53: 
> 54:     private static void verifyHostArch(JPackageCommand cmd) throws 
> Exception {
> 55:         Path distributionFile = cmd.unpackedPackageDirectory()

I think `cmd.pathToUnpackedPackageFile("/")` would be the equivalent to 
`cmd.unpackedPackageDirectory()`. If it is, there would be no need for changes 
to JPackageCommand.

test/jdk/tools/jpackage/macosx/HostArchPkgTest.java line 57:

> 55:         Path distributionFile = cmd.unpackedPackageDirectory()
> 56:                 .toAbsolutePath()
> 57:                 .getParent()

Why .getParent() is needed here?

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3807

Reply via email to