On Fri, 2 Jul 2021 06:20:29 GMT, Markus KARG 
<github.com+1701815+mk...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> This PR-*draft* is **work in progress** and an invitation to discuss a 
>> possible solution for issue 
>> [JDK-8265891](https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8265891). It is *not 
>> yet* intended for a final review.
>> 
>> As proposed in JDK-8265891, this PR provides an implementation for 
>> `Channels.newInputStream().transferTo()` which provide superior performance 
>> compared to the current implementation. The changes are:
>> * Prevents transfers through the JVM heap as much as possibly by offloading 
>> to deeper levels via NIO, hence allowing the operating system to optimize 
>> the transfer.
>> * Using more JRE heap in the fallback case when no NIO is possible (still 
>> only KiBs, hence mostl ynegligible even on SBCs) to better perform on modern 
>> hardware / fast I/O devides.
>> 
>> Using JMH I have benchmarked both, the original implementation and this 
>> implementation, and (depending on the used hardware and use case) 
>> performance change was approx. doubled performance. So this PoC proofs that 
>> it makes sense to finalize this work and turn it into an actual OpenJDK 
>> contribution. 
>> 
>> I encourage everybody to discuss this draft:
>> * Are there valid arguments for *not* doing this change?
>> * Is there a *better* way to improve performance of 
>> `Channels.newInputStream().transferTo()`?
>> * How to go on from here: What is missing to get this ready for an actual 
>> review?
>
> Markus KARG has refreshed the contents of this pull request, and previous 
> commits have been removed. The incremental views will show differences 
> compared to the previous content of the PR.

Sorry for the delay. I now have pushed a first draft of the test. IIUC then 
five implementation have to be tested just for the actualy API, i. e. whether 
they throws NPE when `out` is `null`, and whether they transfer small, single 
turn, and multiple turn loads correctly. The tests are taken from 
`InputStream/TransferTo.java` as you proposed, and I am not using mocking but 
instead use `Channels.new*` as the existing tests you proposed as a blueprint. 
I hope I understood your requests and proposals correctly, if not please tell 
me. The tests pass well and proof that the new implementations work as expected 
and API-compliant.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4263

Reply via email to