On Thu, 29 Jul 2021 16:42:35 GMT, Brian Burkhalter <b...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> The JavaDocs in `InputStream::transferTo` *cleary* tell the caller that >> there is **no** guarantee of *any* specific behavior in that particular >> case: >>>The behavior for the case where the input and/or output stream is >>>asynchronously closed, or the thread interrupted during the transfer, is >>>highly input and output stream specific, and therefore not specified. > > Good point. :-) >> This is a question of style and personal likes. Code maintenance is much >> easier if variables are defined *near* to its first use, not *far away* (as >> in the Pascal or C language). If the reviewers want me to change it, I will >> do it. > > It's actually a matter of convention but I think it can remain as it is. Ok for me, otherwise just clearly tell me and I do change it. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4263
