On Fri, 17 Sep 2021 06:59:09 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev <sh...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> During the review of JDK-8272914 that added hotspot:tier{2,3} groups, >> @iignatev suggested to create tier4 groups that capture all tests not in >> tiers{1,2,3}. >> >> Caveats: >> - I excluded `applications` from `hotspot:tier4`, because they require test >> dependencies (e.g. jcstress). >> - `jdk:tier4` only runs well with `JTREG_KEYWORDS=!headful` or reduced >> concurrency with `TEST_JOBS=1`, because headful tests cannot run in parallel >> >> Sample run with `JTREG_KEYWORDS=!headful`: >> >> >> ============================== >> Test summary >> ============================== >> TEST TOTAL PASS FAIL ERROR >> >>>> jtreg:test/hotspot/jtreg:tier4 3585 3584 0 1 >>>> << >>>> jtreg:test/jdk:tier4 2893 2887 5 1 >>>> << >> jtreg:test/langtools:tier4 0 0 0 0 >> >> jtreg:test/jaxp:tier4 0 0 0 0 >> >> ============================== >> >> real 699m39.462s >> user 6626m8.448s >> sys 1110m43.704s >> >> >> There are interesting test failures on my machine, which I would address >> separately. > > Aleksey Shipilev has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a > merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes > brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains five additional > commits since the last revision: > > - Merge branch 'master' into JDK-8273314-tier4 > - Merge branch 'master' into JDK-8273314-tier4 > - Drop applications and fix the comment > - Drop exceptions > - Add tier4 test groups LGTM ------------- Marked as reviewed by iignatyev (Reviewer). PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5357