On Mon, 6 Sep 2021 13:22:03 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev <sh...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> During the review of JDK-8272914 that added hotspot:tier{2,3} groups, 
>> @iignatev suggested to create tier4 groups that capture all tests not in 
>> tiers{1,2,3}. 
>> 
>> Caveats:
>>  - I excluded `applications` from `hotspot:tier4`, because they require test 
>> dependencies (e.g. jcstress).
>>  - `jdk:tier4` only runs well with `JTREG_KEYWORDS=!headful` or reduced 
>> concurrency with `TEST_JOBS=1`, because headful tests cannot run in parallel
>> 
>> Sample run with `JTREG_KEYWORDS=!headful`:
>> 
>> 
>> ==============================
>> Test summary
>> ==============================
>>    TEST                                              TOTAL  PASS  FAIL ERROR 
>>   
>>>> jtreg:test/hotspot/jtreg:tier4                     3585  3584     0     1 
>>>> <<
>>>> jtreg:test/jdk:tier4                               2893  2887     5     1 
>>>> <<
>>    jtreg:test/langtools:tier4                            0     0     0     0 
>>   
>>    jtreg:test/jaxp:tier4                                 0     0     0     0 
>>   
>> ==============================
>> 
>> real 699m39.462s
>> user 6626m8.448s
>> sys  1110m43.704s
>> 
>> 
>> There are interesting test failures on my machine, which I would address 
>> separately.
>
> Aleksey Shipilev has updated the pull request incrementally with one 
> additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Drop applications and fix the comment

All right, I am convinced that current patch is as good as it gets. GUI tests 
still do not run well with default parallelism, but I see no reason to block 
this integration before that is resolved. Either run `tier4` in headless mode, 
or limit the parallelism.

@iignatev, @mrserb, @dholmes-ora -- are you good with this?

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5357

Reply via email to