This PR follows up one of the recent PRs, where I used a non-canonical modifier
order. Since the problem was noticed [^1], why not to address it at mass?
As far as I remember, the first mass-canonicalization of modifiers took place
in JDK-8136583 in 2015 [^2]. That change affected 1780 lines spanning 453
files. Since then modifiers have become a bit lose, and it makes sense to
re-bless (using the JDK-8136583 terminology) them.
This change was produced by running the below command followed by updating the
copyright years on the affected files where necessary:
$ sh ./bin/blessed-modifier-order.sh src/java.base
The resulting change is much smaller than that of 2015: 39 lines spanning 21
files.
[^1]:
https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2021-November/082987.html
(or https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/6191#pullrequestreview-794333365)
[^2]:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2015-September/035217.html
-------------
Commit messages:
- Initial commit
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6213/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk&pr=6213&range=00
Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8276348
Stats: 39 lines in 21 files changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 39 mod
Patch: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6213.diff
Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/6213/head:pull/6213
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6213
