On Sat, 22 Jan 2022 21:48:38 GMT, Johannes Kuhn <jk...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> The MethodHandle of a default method should be made as a fixed arity method 
>> handle because it is invoked via Proxy's invocation handle with a non-vararg 
>> array of arguments.  On the other hand, the 
>> `InvocationHandle::invokeDefault` method  was added in Java 16 to invoke a 
>> default method of a proxy instance.  This patch simply converts the 
>> implementation to call `InvocationHandle::invokeDefault` instead.
>
> When testing this patch from a named module and not-exported package, I get 
> the following exception:
> 
> 
> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.reflect.UndeclaredThrowableException
>       at jdk.proxy1/com.sun.proxy.jdk.proxy1.$Proxy0.toString(Unknown Source)
>       at test.openjdk/test.openjdk.ProxyTest.main(ProxyTest.java:22)
> Caused by: java.lang.IllegalAccessException: class 
> java.lang.invoke.MethodHandleProxies$1 (in module java.base) cannot access 
> interface test.openjdk.ProxyTest$Test (in module test.openjdk) because module 
> test.openjdk does not export test.openjdk to module java.base
>       at 
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.Reflection.newIllegalAccessException(Reflection.java:394)
>       at 
> java.base/java.lang.reflect.AccessibleObject.checkAccess(AccessibleObject.java:674)
>       at 
> java.base/java.lang.reflect.InvocationHandler.invokeDefault(InvocationHandler.java:278)
>       at 
> java.base/java.lang.invoke.MethodHandleProxies$1.invoke(MethodHandleProxies.java:202)
>       ... 2 more
> 
> 
> [My test 
> code](https://gist.github.com/DasBrain/60dbc1c9075b15635d9c87e8295f1c1a).  
> Running without the patch results in the wrong output for default varargs 
> methods, so this is a regression.

@DasBrain thanks for catching this.   
`MethodHandleProxies::asInterfaceInstance` should perform no additional access 
checks other than checking the interface is public and not sealed, as specified 
in the spec.

The patch is updated.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/7185

Reply via email to