I ran `codespell` on modules owned by core-libs, and accepted those changes where it indeed discovered real typos.
I will update copyright years using a script before pushing (otherwise like every second change would be a copyright update, making reviewing much harder). The long term goal here is to make tooling support for running `codespell`. The trouble with automating this is of course all false positives. But before even trying to solve that issue, all true positives must be fixed. Hence this PR. ------------- Commit messages: - Pass #2 core - Pass #1 core - Pass #2 misc - Pass #1 misc Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8364/files Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk&pr=8364&range=00 Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8285485 Stats: 215 lines in 103 files changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 215 mod Patch: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8364.diff Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/8364/head:pull/8364 PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8364
