On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 13:22:34 GMT, Jaikiran Pai <j...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Basic but fairly comprehensive set of tests for `IdentityHashMap`. The patch
>> in the bug report that breaks `IdentityHashMap` now causes several cases in
>> this new test to fail. There's more that could be done, but the new tests
>> cover most of the core functions of `IdentityHashMap`. Unfortunately it
>> seems difficult to merge this with the existing, comprehensive Collections
>> tests (e.g., MOAT.java) because those tests implicity rely on
>> `equals()`-based contract instead of the special-purpose `==`-based contract
>> used by `IdentityHashMap`.
>
> test/jdk/java/util/IdentityHashMap/Basic.java line 337:
>
>> 335: public void testPutOverwrite() {
>> 336: Box newVal = new Box(v1a);
>> 337: map.put(k1a, newVal);
>
> Should we capture the return value and assert that it's not null and is
> identity equal to `v1a`?
>
> Perhaps, similarly at a few other places where we do put and putIfAbsent?
Yes, good point, I'll add checks of the return values in the appropriate
places. There are several, including `remove`, `computeX`, `put`, etc.
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8354
