On Thu, 26 May 2022 21:22:23 GMT, Roger Riggs <rri...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> Even using a Cleaner is a more overhead than necessary. I would have skipped > the overhead of a cleaner and Atomic classes with something more self > contained as a static method: I agreed that the using of Cleaner is still heavy, but it may be acceptable as the code is for testing only. If a new static method is introduced, test cases using the current API would also need update so as to benefit from it. I was hesitate for test cases update as it may involve more evaluations (and risks). But let me check. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8907
