core-libs-dev  

Messages by Thread

• Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v131] Doug Lea
• [External] : HttpClient: no way to control name resolution per client Rafael Winterhalter
  • Re: [External] : HttpClient: no way to control name resolution per client Alan Bateman
• RFR: 8393048: HijrahDate.withVariant fails when the target Hijrah variant has a shorter month sbracely
  • Re: RFR: 8393048: HijrahDate.withVariant fails when the target Hijrah variant has a shorter month [v2] sbracely
• RFR: 8392994: DateTimeFormatter prints specific zone names for offset-only values Naoto Sato
• RFR: 8392995: CLDR metazone offset overrides custom DateFormatSymbols and TimeZone behavior Justin Lu
• Re: RFR: 8380361: Display -XshowSettings configuration data via jcmd [v11] Kieran Farrell
• Re: RFR: 8380361: Display -XshowSettings configuration data via jcmd [v10] Kieran Farrell
• RFR: 8388161: value-objects-jls: 12.6: address finalization of value objects Dan Smith
  • Re: RFR: 8388161: value-objects-jls: 12.6: address finalization of value objects Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8388161: value-objects-jls: 12.6: address finalization of value objects Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8388161: value-objects-jls: 12.6: address finalization of value objects Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8388161: value-objects-jls: 12.6: address finalization of value objects Alan Bateman
• RFR: 8392957: (tz) Clean up the Windows TimeZone_md.c Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8392957: (tz) Clean up the Windows TimeZone_md.c Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8392957: (tz) Clean up the Windows TimeZone_md.c Justin Lu
• RFR: 8392966: Improve error message for executable JAR file Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8392966: Improve error message for executable JAR file Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8392966: Improve error message for executable JAR file Christian Stein
• RFR: 8392914: Several jdk/internal/vm/Continuation/BasicExt.java test cases fail with -XX:CompileThresholdScaling=0.01 Richard Reingruber
  • Re: RFR: 8392914: Several jdk/internal/vm/Continuation/BasicExt.java test cases fail with -XX:CompileThresholdScaling=0.01 Martin Doerr
  • Re: RFR: 8392914: Several jdk/internal/vm/Continuation/BasicExt.java test cases fail with -XX:CompileThresholdScaling=0.01 David Briemann
• Re: RFR: 8383244: Shared scope closure should only deoptimize if the scope oop is live [v8] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8383244: Shared scope closure should only deoptimize if the scope oop is live [v8] Vladimir Ivanov
• Integrated: 8385513: AArch64: Improve ArraysSupport.vectorizedHashCode performance for large arrays Ehsan Behrangi
• Integrated: 8381560: AArch64: Optimize String.equals intrinsic Ehsan Behrangi
• RFR: 8392465: [Vector API] VectorOperators.Operator::compatibleWith gives incorrect results for COMPRESS_BITS and EXPAND_BITS Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8392465: [Vector API] VectorOperators.Operator::compatibleWith gives incorrect results for COMPRESS_BITS and EXPAND_BITS Paul Sandoz
• [External] : Getting hold of the user provided system properties Rafael Winterhalter
• Re: RFR: 8372153: AArch64: Performance regression in long reduction microbenchmarks after JDK-8340093 [v9] Fei Gao
• Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v130] Doug Lea
• Integrated: 8364007: Add no-argument codePointCount method to String Tatsunori Uchino
• RFR: 8377386: Vector: Support vector product instructions Chad Rakoczy
• Re: RFR: 8348828: Windows dll loading now resolves symlinks [v16] Benjamin Peterson
• RFR: 8392848: HijrahChronology.createEpochMonths reports minYear instead of the invalid year sbracely
  • Re: RFR: 8392848: HijrahChronology.createEpochMonths reports minYear instead of the invalid year Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8392848: HijrahChronology.createEpochMonths reports minYear instead of the invalid year sbracely
  • Re: RFR: 8392848: HijrahChronology.createEpochMonths reports minYear instead of the invalid year [v4] sbracely
  • Re: RFR: 8392848: HijrahChronology.createEpochMonths reports minYear instead of the invalid year [v2] sbracely
  • Re: RFR: 8392848: HijrahChronology.createEpochMonths reports minYear instead of the invalid year [v3] sbracely
  • Re: RFR: 8392848: HijrahChronology.createEpochMonths reports minYear instead of the invalid year [v4] sbracely
  • Re: RFR: 8392848: HijrahChronology.createEpochMonths reports minYear instead of the invalid year [v4] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8392848: HijrahChronology.createEpochMonths reports minYear instead of the invalid year [v4] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8392848: HijrahChronology.createEpochMonths reports minYear instead of the invalid year [v4] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8392848: HijrahChronology.createEpochMonths reports minYear instead of the invalid year [v4] sbracely
  • Re: RFR: 8392848: HijrahChronology.createEpochMonths reports minYear instead of the invalid year [v5] sbracely
  • Re: RFR: 8392848: HijrahChronology.createEpochMonths reports minYear instead of the invalid year [v5] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8392848: HijrahChronology.createEpochMonths reports minYear instead of the invalid year [v5] sbracely
  • Re: RFR: 8392848: HijrahChronology.createEpochMonths reports minYear instead of the invalid year [v6] sbracely
  • Re: RFR: 8392848: HijrahChronology.createEpochMonths reports minYear instead of the invalid year [v6] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8392848: HijrahChronology.createEpochMonths reports minYear instead of the invalid year [v6] sbracely
  • Re: RFR: 8392848: HijrahChronology.createEpochMonths reports minYear instead of the invalid year [v6] duke
  • Re: RFR: 8392848: HijrahChronology.createEpochMonths reports minYear instead of the invalid year [v6] Justin Lu
  • Integrated: 8392848: HijrahChronology.createEpochMonths reports minYear instead of the invalid year sbracely
• Withdrawn: 8384082: Incorrect surrogate handling in Pattern.hasBaseCharacter for word boundaries duke
• RFR: 8392223: CLDR provider mutates shared cached time zone name arrays moseoh
  • Re: RFR: 8392223: CLDR provider mutates shared cached time zone name arrays Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8392223: CLDR provider mutates shared cached time zone name arrays [v2] moseoh
  • Re: RFR: 8392223: CLDR provider mutates shared cached time zone name arrays [v2] moseoh
  • Re: RFR: 8392223: CLDR provider mutates shared cached time zone name arrays [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8392223: CLDR provider mutates shared cached time zone name arrays [v2] duke
• RFR: 8392827: com/sun/jndi/dns/ConfigTests/PortUnreachable test threshold should scale with timeout factor Arno Zeller
  • Re: RFR: 8392827: com/sun/jndi/dns/ConfigTests/PortUnreachable test threshold should scale with timeout factor sendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8392827: com/sun/jndi/dns/ConfigTests/PortUnreachable test threshold should scale with timeout factor Arno Zeller
  • Re: RFR: 8392827: com/sun/jndi/dns/ConfigTests/PortUnreachable test threshold should scale with timeout factor Christoph Langer
  • Re: RFR: 8392827: com/sun/jndi/dns/ConfigTests/PortUnreachable test threshold should scale with timeout factor [v2] Arno Zeller
  • Re: RFR: 8392827: com/sun/jndi/dns/ConfigTests/PortUnreachable test threshold should scale with timeout factor [v2] Christoph Langer
  • Re: RFR: 8392827: com/sun/jndi/dns/ConfigTests/PortUnreachable test threshold should scale with timeout factor [v3] Arno Zeller
  • Re: RFR: 8392827: com/sun/jndi/dns/ConfigTests/PortUnreachable test threshold should scale with timeout factor [v3] Arno Zeller
  • Re: RFR: 8392827: com/sun/jndi/dns/ConfigTests/PortUnreachable test threshold should scale with timeout factor [v4] Arno Zeller
  • Re: RFR: 8392827: com/sun/jndi/dns/ConfigTests/PortUnreachable test threshold should scale with timeout factor [v4] Christoph Langer
  • Re: RFR: 8392827: com/sun/jndi/dns/ConfigTests/PortUnreachable test threshold should scale with timeout factor [v4] Jie Fu
  • Integrated: 8392827: com/sun/jndi/dns/ConfigTests/PortUnreachable test threshold should scale with timeout factor Arno Zeller
• RFR: 8390157: (coll) PriorityQueue copy constructors accept non-Comparable single-element collection SrikanthP
• Re: RFR: 8383244: Shared scope closure should only deoptimize if the scope oop is live [v7] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8383244: Shared scope closure should only deoptimize if the scope oop is live [v7] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8383244: Shared scope closure should only deoptimize if the scope oop is live [v7] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8383244: Shared scope closure should only deoptimize if the scope oop is live [v7] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8383244: Shared scope closure should only deoptimize if the scope oop is live [v7] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8383244: Shared scope closure should only deoptimize if the scope oop is live [v7] Jorn Vernee
• Re: RFR: 8383244: Shared scope closure should only deoptimize if the scope oop is live [v5] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8383244: Shared scope closure should only deoptimize if the scope oop is live [v5] Jorn Vernee
• Re: RFR: 8383244: Shared scope closure should only deoptimize if the scope oop is live [v6] Jorn Vernee
• Re: RFR: 8344159: Add lint warnings for unnecessary warning suppression [v18] Archie Cobbs
• RFR: 8392650: Replace some RegQueryValueEx* function calls in jdk java.base native libs by RegGetValue Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8392650: Replace some RegQueryValueEx* function calls in jdk java.base native libs by RegGetValue Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8392650: Replace some RegQueryValueEx* function calls in jdk java.base native libs by RegGetValue Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8392650: Replace some RegQueryValueEx* function calls in jdk java.base native libs by RegGetValue Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8392650: Replace some RegQueryValueEx* function calls in jdk java.base native libs by RegGetValue [v2] Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8392650: Replace some RegQueryValueEx* function calls in jdk java.base native libs by RegGetValue [v2] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8392650: Replace some RegQueryValueEx* function calls in jdk java.base native libs by RegGetValue Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8392650: Replace some RegQueryValueEx* function calls in jdk java.base native libs by RegGetValue Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8392650: Replace some RegQueryValueEx* function calls in jdk java.base native libs by RegGetValue Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8392650: Replace some RegQueryValueEx* function calls in jdk java.base native libs by RegGetValue Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8392650: Replace some RegQueryValueEx* function calls in jdk java.base native libs by RegGetValue [v2] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8392650: Replace some RegQueryValueEx* function calls in jdk java.base native libs by RegGetValue [v2] Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8392650: Replace some RegQueryValueEx* function calls in jdk java.base native libs by RegGetValue [v2] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8392650: Replace some RegQueryValueEx* function calls in jdk java.base native libs by RegGetValue [v2] Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8392650: Replace some RegQueryValueEx* function calls in jdk java.base native libs by RegGetValue [v2] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8392650: Replace some RegQueryValueEx* function calls in jdk java.base native libs by RegGetValue Matthias Baesken
  • Integrated: 8392650: Replace some RegQueryValueEx* function calls in jdk java.base native libs by RegGetValue Matthias Baesken
• Re: RFR: 8266431: Dual-Pivot Quicksort improvements (Radix sort) [v3] Vladimir Yaroslavskiy
• RFR: 8392606: HijrahChronology computes minYearLength as 0 and skips the last configured year Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8392606: HijrahChronology computes minYearLength as 0 and skips the last configured year Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8392606: HijrahChronology computes minYearLength as 0 and skips the last configured year Justin Lu
  • Integrated: 8392606: HijrahChronology computes minYearLength as 0 and skips the last configured year Justin Lu
• RFR: 8392723: Restore Float16 to integral conversion behavior on AVX10.2 targets Mohamed Issa
  • Re: RFR: 8392723: Restore Float16 to integral conversion behavior on AVX10.2 targets [v2] Mohamed Issa
  • Re: RFR: 8392723: Restore Float16 to integral conversion behavior on AVX10.2 targets [v2] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8392723: Restore Float16 to integral conversion behavior on AVX10.2 targets [v2] Mohamed Issa
  • Re: RFR: 8392723: Restore Float16 to integral conversion behavior on AVX10.2 targets [v2] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8392723: Restore Float16 to integral conversion behavior on AVX10.2 targets [v3] Mohamed Issa
  • Re: RFR: 8392723: Restore Float16 to integral conversion behavior on AVX10.2 targets [v3] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8392723: Restore Float16 to integral conversion behavior on AVX10.2 targets [v3] Sandhya Viswanathan
  • Re: RFR: 8392723: Restore Float16 to integral conversion behavior on AVX10.2 targets [v3] Mohamed Issa
  • Re: RFR: 8392723: Restore Float16 to integral conversion behavior on AVX10.2 targets [v3] Sandhya Viswanathan
  • Re: RFR: 8392723: Restore Float16 to integral conversion behavior on AVX10.2 targets [v3] Sandhya Viswanathan
  • Re: RFR: 8392723: Restore Float16 to integral conversion behavior on AVX10.2 targets [v3] Mohamed Issa
  • Re: RFR: 8392723: Restore Float16 to integral conversion behavior on AVX10.2 targets [v3] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8392723: Restore Float16 to integral conversion behavior on AVX10.2 targets [v3] Mohamed Issa
  • Re: RFR: 8392723: Restore Float16 to integral conversion behavior on AVX10.2 targets [v4] Mohamed Issa
• Integrated: 8380567: DynamicCallSiteDesc.bootstrapMethod should return DirectMethodHandleDesc Chen Liang
• RFR: 8390055: Make container test mounts frendlier to SELinux Ivan Bereziuk
  • Re: RFR: 8390055: Make container test mounts frendlier to SELinux Casper Norrbin
  • Re: RFR: 8390055: Make container test mounts frendlier to SELinux Ivan Bereziuk
  • Re: RFR: 8390055: Make container test mounts frendlier to SELinux Ramkumar Sunderbabu
  • Re: RFR: 8390055: Make container test mounts frendlier to SELinux duke
  • Re: RFR: 8390055: Make container test mounts frendlier to SELinux Ivan Bereziuk
• Integrated: 8303762: Optimize vector slice operation with constant index using VPALIGNR instruction Jatin Bhateja
• Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v129] Doug Lea
• RFR: 8392531: jlink produces a different lib/modules on every run Dušan Bálek
  • Re: RFR: 8392531: jlink produces a different lib/modules on every run Severin Gehwolf
  • Re: RFR: 8392531: jlink produces a different lib/modules on every run [v2] Dušan Bálek
  • Re: RFR: 8392531: jlink produces a different lib/modules on every run [v2] Dušan Bálek
  • Re: RFR: 8392531: jlink produces a different lib/modules on every run [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8392531: jlink produces a different lib/modules on every run [v2] Severin Gehwolf
  • Integrated: 8392531: jlink produces a different lib/modules on every run Dušan Bálek
• RFR: 8392548: Optimize instruction sequence for x86 ReplHF_reg instruction selection pattern Jatin Bhateja
• RFR: 8392400: CompactNumberFormat.format(BigDecimal) formats inconsistently compared to format(double) Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8392400: CompactNumberFormat.format(BigDecimal) formats inconsistently compared to format(double) ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8392400: CompactNumberFormat.format(BigDecimal) formats inconsistently compared to format(double) [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8392400: CompactNumberFormat.format(BigDecimal) formats inconsistently compared to format(double) [v3] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8392400: CompactNumberFormat.format(BigDecimal) formats inconsistently compared to format(double) [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8392400: CompactNumberFormat.format(BigDecimal) formats inconsistently compared to format(double) [v4] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8392400: CompactNumberFormat.format(BigDecimal) formats inconsistently compared to format(double) [v5] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8392400: CompactNumberFormat.format(BigDecimal) formats inconsistently compared to format(double) [v5] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8392400: CompactNumberFormat.format(BigDecimal) formats inconsistently compared to format(double) [v6] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8392400: CompactNumberFormat.format(BigDecimal) formats inconsistently compared to format(double) [v6] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8392400: CompactNumberFormat.format(BigDecimal) formats inconsistently compared to format(double) [v6] Justin Lu
  • Integrated: 8392400: CompactNumberFormat.format(BigDecimal) formats inconsistently compared to format(double) Justin Lu
• Re: RFR: 8380361: Display -XshowSettings configuration data via jcmd [v9] Kieran Farrell
  • Re: RFR: 8380361: Display -XshowSettings configuration data via jcmd [v9] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8380361: Display -XshowSettings configuration data via jcmd [v9] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8380361: Display -XshowSettings configuration data via jcmd [v9] Kieran Farrell
  • Re: RFR: 8380361: Display -XshowSettings configuration data via jcmd [v9] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8380361: Display -XshowSettings configuration data via jcmd [v9] Kieran Farrell
• Re: RFR: 8380567: DynamicCallSiteDesc.bootstrapMethod should return DirectMethodHandleDesc [v2] Chen Liang
• Re: RFR: 8380567: DynamicCallSiteDesc.bootstrapMethod should return DirectMethodHandleDesc [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8380567: DynamicCallSiteDesc.bootstrapMethod should return DirectMethodHandleDesc [v3] Vicente Romero
  • Re: RFR: 8380567: DynamicCallSiteDesc.bootstrapMethod should return DirectMethodHandleDesc [v3] ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8380567: DynamicCallSiteDesc.bootstrapMethod should return DirectMethodHandleDesc [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8380567: DynamicCallSiteDesc.bootstrapMethod should return DirectMethodHandleDesc [v3] Chen Liang
• Re: RFR: 8339188: Javac should issue a compiler error when a value class overrides Object::finalize [v12] Vicente Romero
• Re: RFR: 8339188: Javac should issue a compiler error when a value class overrides Object::finalize [v13] Vicente Romero
• RFR: 8389321: Clarify jlink options Dušan Bálek
  • Re: RFR: 8389321: Clarify jlink options [v2] Dušan Bálek
  • Re: RFR: 8389321: Clarify jlink options Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: 8389321: Clarify jlink options Severin Gehwolf
  • Re: RFR: 8389321: Clarify jlink options Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: 8389321: Clarify jlink options [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8389321: Clarify jlink options [v2] Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: 8389321: Clarify jlink options [v2] Dušan Bálek
  • Re: RFR: 8389321: Clarify jlink options [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8389321: Clarify jlink options [v2] Dušan Bálek
  • Re: RFR: 8389321: Clarify jlink options [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8389321: Clarify jlink options [v2] Dušan Bálek
  • Re: RFR: 8389321: Clarify jlink options [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8389321: Clarify jlink options [v2] Dušan Bálek
  • Re: RFR: 8389321: Clarify jlink options [v3] Dušan Bálek
  • Re: RFR: 8389321: Clarify jlink options [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8389321: Clarify jlink options [v4] Dušan Bálek
  • Re: RFR: 8389321: Clarify jlink options [v3] Dušan Bálek
  • Re: RFR: 8389321: Clarify jlink options [v4] Dušan Bálek
  • Re: RFR: 8389321: Clarify jlink options [v4] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8389321: Clarify jlink options [v4] Dušan Bálek
  • Re: RFR: 8389321: Clarify jlink options [v5] Dušan Bálek
  • Re: RFR: 8389321: Clarify jlink options [v5] Alan Bateman
  • Integrated: 8389321: Clarify jlink options Dušan Bálek
• RFR: 8391651: VarHandle CAS on flattened nullable empty-value field throws IllegalArgumentException Johan Sjölen
  • Re: RFR: 8391651: VarHandle CAS on flattened nullable empty-value field throws IllegalArgumentException Frederic Parain
  • Re: RFR: 8391651: VarHandle CAS on flattened nullable empty-value field throws IllegalArgumentException Casper Norrbin
  • Re: RFR: 8391651: VarHandle CAS on flattened nullable empty-value field throws IllegalArgumentException [v2] Johan Sjölen
  • Re: RFR: 8391651: VarHandle CAS on flattened nullable empty-value field throws IllegalArgumentException [v2] Casper Norrbin
  • Re: RFR: 8391651: VarHandle CAS on flattened nullable empty-value field throws IllegalArgumentException [v2] Frederic Parain
  • Re: RFR: 8391651: VarHandle CAS on flattened nullable empty-value field throws IllegalArgumentException [v2] Johan Sjölen
  • Integrated: 8391651: VarHandle CAS on flattened nullable empty-value field throws IllegalArgumentException Johan Sjölen
• RFR: 8392541: Remove the internal BufferStack and CaptureStateUtil Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8392541: Remove the internal BufferStack and CaptureStateUtil Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8392541: Remove the internal BufferStack and CaptureStateUtil Jorn Vernee

• Earlier messages