core-libs-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: RFR: 8361950: Update to use jtreg 8 Joe Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8361950: Update to use jtreg 8 Jaikiran Pai
• RFR: 8361533: Apply java.io.Serial annotations in java.logging Sergey Bylokhov
  • Re: RFR: 8361533: Apply java.io.Serial annotations in java.logging Alan Bateman
• RFR: 8315131: Clarify VarHandle set/get access on 32-bit platforms Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8315131: Clarify VarHandle set/get access on 32-bit platforms Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8315131: Clarify VarHandle set/get access on 32-bit platforms Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8315131: Clarify VarHandle set/get access on 32-bit platforms Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8315131: Clarify VarHandle set/get access on 32-bit platforms [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8315131: Clarify VarHandle set/get access on 32-bit platforms John Rose
  • Re: RFR: 8315131: Clarify VarHandle set/get access on 32-bit platforms [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8315131: Clarify VarHandle set/get access on 32-bit platforms [v2] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8315131: Clarify VarHandle set/get access on 32-bit platforms [v2] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8315131: Clarify VarHandle set/get access on 32-bit platforms [v2] Paul Sandoz
  • Re: RFR: 8315131: Clarify VarHandle set/get access on 32-bit platforms [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8315131: Clarify VarHandle set/get access on 32-bit platforms [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8315131: Clarify VarHandle set/get access on 32-bit platforms [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8315131: Clarify VarHandle set/get access on 32-bit platforms [v3] Paul Sandoz
  • Re: RFR: 8315131: Clarify VarHandle set/get access on 32-bit platforms [v3] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8315131: Clarify VarHandle set/get access on 32-bit platforms [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8315131: Clarify VarHandle set/get access on 32-bit platforms [v3] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8315131: Clarify VarHandle set/get access on 32-bit platforms [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8315131: Clarify VarHandle set/get access on 32-bit platforms [v3] John R Rose
  • Re: RFR: 8315131: Clarify VarHandle set/get access on 32-bit platforms [v3] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8315131: Clarify VarHandle set/get access on 32-bit platforms [v4] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8315131: Clarify VarHandle set/get access on 32-bit platforms [v4] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8315131: Clarify VarHandle set/get access on 32-bit platforms [v4] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8315131: Clarify VarHandle set/get access on 32-bit platforms [v5] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8315131: Clarify VarHandle set/get access on 32-bit platforms [v5] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8315131: Clarify VarHandle set/get access on 32-bit platforms [v5] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8315131: Clarify VarHandle set/get access on 32-bit platforms [v5] John R Rose
• RFR: 8361909: ConstantPoolBuilder::loadableConstantEntry and constantValueEntry should throw NPE Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8361909: ConstantPoolBuilder::loadableConstantEntry and constantValueEntry should throw NPE Adam Sotona
  • Re: RFR: 8361909: ConstantPoolBuilder::loadableConstantEntry and constantValueEntry should throw NPE Chen Liang
  • Integrated: 8361909: ConstantPoolBuilder::loadableConstantEntry and constantValueEntry should throw NPE Chen Liang
• RFR: 8361908: Mix and match of dead and valid exception handler leads to malformed class file Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8361908: Mix and match of dead and valid exception handler leads to malformed class file Adam Sotona
  • Re: RFR: 8361908: Mix and match of dead and valid exception handler leads to malformed class file Chen Liang
  • Integrated: 8361908: Mix and match of dead and valid exception handler leads to malformed class file Chen Liang
• RFR: 8361635: Missing List length validation in the Class-File API Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8361635: Missing List length validation in the Class-File API Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8361635: Missing List length validation in the Class-File API Adam Sotona
  • Re: RFR: 8361635: Missing List length validation in the Class-File API Adam Sotona
  • Re: RFR: 8361635: Missing List length validation in the Class-File API [v2] Chen Liang
• RFR: 8361842: Validate input in both Java and C++ for java.lang.StringCoding intrinsics Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8361842: Validate input in both Java and C++ for java.lang.StringCoding intrinsics Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8361842: Validate input in both Java and C++ for java.lang.StringCoding intrinsics Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: RFR: 8361842: Validate input in both Java and C++ for java.lang.StringCoding intrinsics Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8361842: Validate input in both Java and C++ for java.lang.StringCoding intrinsics ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8361842: Validate input in both Java and C++ for java.lang.StringCoding intrinsics Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8361842: Validate input in both Java and C++ for java.lang.StringCoding intrinsics Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8361842: Validate input in both Java and C++ for java.lang.StringCoding intrinsics Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8361842: Validate input in both Java and C++ for java.lang.StringCoding intrinsics Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8361842: Move input validation checks to Java for String-related intrinsics [v6] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8361842: Move input validation checks to Java for String-related intrinsics [v7] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: RFR: 8361842: Move input validation checks to Java for String-related intrinsics [v8] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8361842: Move input validation checks to Java for String-related intrinsics [v8] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8361842: Move input validation checks to Java for String-related intrinsics [v8] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8361842: Validate input in both Java and C++ for java.lang.StringCoding intrinsics John R Rose
  • Re: RFR: 8361842: Move input validation checks to Java for String-related intrinsics Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8361842: Move input validation checks to Java for String-related intrinsics Damon Fenacci
  • Re: RFR: 8361842: Move input validation checks to Java for String-related intrinsics [v2] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8361842: Move input validation checks to Java for String-related intrinsics [v2] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8361842: Move input validation checks to Java for String-related intrinsics [v2] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8361842: Move input validation checks to Java for String-related intrinsics [v2] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8361842: Move input validation checks to Java for String-related intrinsics [v2] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8361842: Move input validation checks to Java for String-related intrinsics [v2] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8361842: Move input validation checks to Java for String-related intrinsics [v2] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8361842: Move input validation checks to Java for String-related intrinsics [v2] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8361842: Move input validation checks to Java for String-related intrinsics [v2] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8361842: Move input validation checks to Java for String-related intrinsics [v3] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8361842: Move input validation checks to Java for String-related intrinsics [v3] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8361842: Move input validation checks to Java for String-related intrinsics [v3] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: RFR: 8361842: Move input validation checks to Java for String-related intrinsics [v3] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8361842: Move input validation checks to Java for String-related intrinsics [v4] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8361842: Move input validation checks to Java for String-related intrinsics [v5] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8361842: Move input validation checks to Java for String-related intrinsics [v6] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8361842: Move input validation checks to Java for String-related intrinsics [v7] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8361842: Move input validation checks to Java for String-related intrinsics [v7] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8361842: Move input validation checks to Java for String-related intrinsics [v7] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8361842: Move input validation checks to Java for String-related intrinsics [v8] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8361842: Move input validation checks to Java for String-related intrinsics [v8] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: RFR: 8361842: Move input validation checks to Java for String-related intrinsics [v8] Damon Fenacci
  • Re: RFR: 8361842: Move input validation checks to Java for String-related intrinsics [v8] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8361842: Move input validation checks to Java for String-related intrinsics [v8] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8361842: Move input validation checks to Java for String-related intrinsics [v8] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8361842: Move input validation checks to Java for java.lang.StringCoding intrinsics [v8] John R Rose
  • Re: RFR: 8361842: Move input validation checks to Java for java.lang.StringCoding intrinsics [v8] John R Rose
  • Re: RFR: 8361842: Move input validation checks to Java for String-related intrinsics [v8] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8361842: Move input validation checks to Java for String-related intrinsics [v8] Yudi Zheng
• RFR: 8358890: VM option -XX:AllowRedefinitionToAddDeleteMethods should be obsoleted then expired Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8358890: VM option -XX:AllowRedefinitionToAddDeleteMethods should be obsoleted then expired [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8358890: VM option -XX:AllowRedefinitionToAddDeleteMethods should be obsoleted then expired [v2] David Holmes
• RFR: 8361102: java.lang.classfile.CodeBuilder.branch(Opcode op, Label target) doesn't throw IllegalArgumentException - if op is not of Opcode.Kind.BRANCH Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8361102: java.lang.classfile.CodeBuilder.branch(Opcode op, Label target) doesn't throw IllegalArgumentException - if op is not of Opcode.Kind.BRANCH Adam Sotona
  • Re: RFR: 8361102: java.lang.classfile.CodeBuilder.branch(Opcode op, Label target) doesn't throw IllegalArgumentException - if op is not of Opcode.Kind.BRANCH Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8361102: java.lang.classfile.CodeBuilder.branch(Opcode op, Label target) doesn't throw IllegalArgumentException - if op is not of Opcode.Kind.BRANCH Adam Sotona
  • Re: RFR: 8361102: java.lang.classfile.CodeBuilder.branch(Opcode op, Label target) doesn't throw IllegalArgumentException - if op is not of Opcode.Kind.BRANCH Chen Liang
  • Integrated: 8361102: java.lang.classfile.CodeBuilder.branch(Opcode op, Label target) doesn't throw IllegalArgumentException - if op is not of Opcode.Kind.BRANCH Chen Liang
• Re: RFR: 8348828: Windows dll loading now resolves symlinks [v4] Benjamin Peterson
• [jdk25] RFR: 8361615: CodeBuilder::parameterSlot throws undocumented IOOBE Chen Liang
  • Re: [jdk25] RFR: 8361615: CodeBuilder::parameterSlot throws undocumented IOOBE Adam Sotona
  • Re: [jdk25] RFR: 8361615: CodeBuilder::parameterSlot throws undocumented IOOBE Chen Liang
  • [jdk25] Integrated: 8361615: CodeBuilder::parameterSlot throws undocumented IOOBE Chen Liang
• RFR: 8361717: Refactor Collections.emptyList() in Locale related classes Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8361717: Refactor Collections.emptyList() in Locale related classes Brian Burkhalter
  • Re: RFR: 8361717: Refactor Collections.emptyList() in Locale related classes Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8361717: Refactor Collections.emptyList() in Locale related classes Johannes Döbler
  • Re: RFR: 8361717: Refactor Collections.emptyList() in Locale related classes Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8361717: Refactor Collections.emptyList() in Locale related classes Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8361717: Refactor Collections.emptyList() in Locale related classes Christian Stein
  • Integrated: 8361717: Refactor Collections.emptyList() in Locale related classes Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8361717: Refactor Collections.emptyList() in Locale related classes Naoto Sato
• RFR: 8361587: AssertionError in File.listFiles() when path is empty and -esa is enabled Brian Burkhalter
  • Re: RFR: 8361587: AssertionError in File.listFiles() when path is empty and -esa is enabled Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8361587: AssertionError in File.listFiles() when path is empty and -esa is enabled [v2] Brian Burkhalter
  • Re: RFR: 8361587: AssertionError in File.listFiles() when path is empty and -esa is enabled Johannes Döbler
  • Re: RFR: 8361587: AssertionError in File.listFiles() when path is empty and -esa is enabled [v2] Brian Burkhalter
  • Re: RFR: 8361587: AssertionError in File.listFiles() when path is empty and -esa is enabled [v2] Brian Burkhalter
  • Re: RFR: 8361587: AssertionError in File.listFiles() when path is empty and -esa is enabled [v3] Brian Burkhalter
  • Re: RFR: 8361587: AssertionError in File.listFiles() when path is empty and -esa is enabled [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8361587: AssertionError in File.listFiles() when path is empty and -esa is enabled [v3] Brian Burkhalter
  • Re: RFR: 8361587: AssertionError in File.listFiles() when path is empty and -esa is enabled [v4] Brian Burkhalter
  • Re: RFR: 8361587: AssertionError in File.listFiles() when path is empty and -esa is enabled [v4] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8361587: AssertionError in File.listFiles() when path is empty and -esa is enabled [v5] Brian Burkhalter
  • Re: RFR: 8361587: AssertionError in File.listFiles() when path is empty and -esa is enabled [v5] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8361587: AssertionError in File.listFiles() when path is empty and -esa is enabled [v5] Brian Burkhalter
  • Re: RFR: 8361587: AssertionError in File.listFiles() when path is empty and -esa is enabled [v5] Brian Burkhalter
  • Re: RFR: 8361587: AssertionError in File.listFiles() when path is empty and -esa is enabled [v6] Brian Burkhalter
  • Re: RFR: 8361587: AssertionError in File.listFiles() when path is empty and -esa is enabled [v7] Brian Burkhalter
  • Re: RFR: 8361587: AssertionError in File.listFiles() when path is empty and -esa is enabled [v7] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8361587: AssertionError in File.listFiles() when path is empty and -esa is enabled [v7] Brian Burkhalter
  • Re: RFR: 8361587: AssertionError in File.listFiles() when path is empty and -esa is enabled [v7] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8361587: AssertionError in File.listFiles() when path is empty and -esa is enabled [v7] Brian Burkhalter
  • Re: RFR: 8361587: AssertionError in File.listFiles() when path is empty and -esa is enabled [v7] Brian Burkhalter
  • Re: RFR: 8361587: AssertionError in File.listFiles() when path is empty and -esa is enabled [v8] Brian Burkhalter
  • Re: RFR: 8361587: AssertionError in File.listFiles() when path is empty and -esa is enabled [v8] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8361587: AssertionError in File.listFiles() when path is empty and -esa is enabled [v8] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8361587: AssertionError in File.listFiles() when path is empty and -esa is enabled [v8] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8361587: AssertionError in File.listFiles() when path is empty and -esa is enabled [v8] Brian Burkhalter
  • Re: RFR: 8361587: AssertionError in File.listFiles() when path is empty and -esa is enabled [v8] Brian Burkhalter
  • Re: RFR: 8361587: AssertionError in File.listFiles() when path is empty and -esa is enabled [v8] Jaikiran Pai
  • Integrated: 8361587: AssertionError in File.listFiles() when path is empty and -esa is enabled Brian Burkhalter
• RFR: 8360411: [TEST] open/test/jdk/java/io/File/MaxPathLength.java Refactor extract method to encapsulate Windows specific test logic Darragh Conway
  • Re: RFR: 8360411: [TEST] open/test/jdk/java/io/File/MaxPathLength.java Refactor extract method to encapsulate Windows specific test logic Mikhail Yankelevich
  • Re: RFR: 8360411: [TEST] open/test/jdk/java/io/File/MaxPathLength.java Refactor extract method to encapsulate Windows specific test logic Darragh Conway
  • Re: RFR: 8360411: [TEST] open/test/jdk/java/io/File/MaxPathLength.java Refactor extract method to encapsulate Windows specific test logic Mikhail Yankelevich
  • Re: RFR: 8360411: [TEST] open/test/jdk/java/io/File/MaxPathLength.java Refactor extract method to encapsulate Windows specific test logic Mahendra Chhipa
  • Re: RFR: 8360411: [TEST] open/test/jdk/java/io/File/MaxPathLength.java Refactor extract method to encapsulate Windows specific test logic Darragh Conway
  • Re: RFR: 8360411: [TEST] open/test/jdk/java/io/File/MaxPathLength.java Refactor extract method to encapsulate Windows specific test logic serhiysachkov
• RFR: 8361640: JFR: RandomAccessFile::readLine emits events for each character Erik Gahlin
  • Re: RFR: 8361640: JFR: RandomAccessFile::readLine emits events for each character Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8361640: JFR: RandomAccessFile::readLine emits events for each character Erik Gahlin
  • Re: RFR: 8361640: JFR: RandomAccessFile::readLine emits events for each character Erik Gahlin
  • Re: RFR: 8361640: JFR: RandomAccessFile::readLine emits events for each character Markus Grönlund
  • Re: RFR: 8361640: JFR: RandomAccessFile::readLine emits events for each character Erik Gahlin
  • Re: RFR: 8361640: JFR: RandomAccessFile::readLine emits events for each character Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8361640: JFR: RandomAccessFile::readLine emits events for each character Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8361640: JFR: RandomAccessFile::readLine emits events for each character [v2] Erik Gahlin
  • Re: RFR: 8361640: JFR: RandomAccessFile::readLine emits events for each character [v2] Erik Gahlin
  • Re: RFR: 8361640: JFR: RandomAccessFile::readLine emits events for each character [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8361640: JFR: RandomAccessFile::readLine emits events for each character [v2] Roger Riggs
  • Integrated: 8361640: JFR: RandomAccessFile::readLine emits events for each character Erik Gahlin
• Re: RFR: 8354242: VectorAPI: combine vector not operation with compare [v11] erifan
• RFR: 8361614: Missing sub-int value validation in the Class-File API Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8361614: Missing sub-int value validation in the Class-File API [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8361614: Missing sub-int value validation in the Class-File API [v2] Adam Sotona
  • Re: RFR: 8361614: Missing sub-int value validation in the Class-File API [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8361614: Missing sub-int value validation in the Class-File API [v4] Chen Liang
• RFR: 8361615: CodeBuilder::parameterSlot throws undocumented IOOBE Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8361615: CodeBuilder::parameterSlot throws undocumented IOOBE Adam Sotona
  • Re: RFR: 8361615: CodeBuilder::parameterSlot throws undocumented IOOBE Chen Liang
  • Integrated: 8361615: CodeBuilder::parameterSlot throws undocumented IOOBE Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8361615: CodeBuilder::parameterSlot throws undocumented IOOBE Chen Liang
• RFR: 8360025: (se) Convert kqueue Selector Implementation to use FFM APIs Darragh Clarke
  • Re: RFR: 8360025: (se) Convert kqueue Selector Implementation to use FFM APIs Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8360025: (se) Convert kqueue Selector Implementation to use FFM APIs Darragh Clarke
  • Re: RFR: 8360025: (se) Convert kqueue Selector Implementation to use FFM APIs Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8360025: (se) Convert kqueue Selector Implementation to use FFM APIs Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8360025: (se) Convert kqueue Selector Implementation to use FFM APIs Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8360025: (se) Convert kqueue Selector Implementation to use FFM APIs Alan Bateman
• Re: RFR: 8349910: Implement JEP 517: HTTP/3 for the HTTP Client API [v11] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8349910: Implement JEP 517: HTTP/3 for the HTTP Client API [v11] Daniel Jeliński
• Re: RFR: 8354242: VectorAPI: combine vector not operation with compare [v10] erifan
  • Re: RFR: 8354242: VectorAPI: combine vector not operation with compare [v10] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8354242: VectorAPI: combine vector not operation with compare [v10] erifan
• Re: RFR: 8351354: Enhance java -XshowSettings:security:tls to show enabled TLS groups and signature algorithms Jaikiran Pai
• Integrated: 8342868: Errors related to unused code on Windows after 8339120 in core libs Julian Waters
• Integrated: 8342682: Errors related to unused code on Windows after 8339120 in dt_shmem jdwp security and jpackage Julian Waters
• RFR: 8361526: Synchronize ClassFile API verifier with hotspot Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8361526: Synchronize ClassFile API verifier with hotspot Adam Sotona
  • Re: RFR: 8361526: Synchronize ClassFile API verifier with hotspot ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8361526: Synchronize ClassFile API verifier with hotspot Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8361526: Synchronize ClassFile API verifier with hotspot Chen Liang
  • Integrated: 8361526: Synchronize ClassFile API verifier with hotspot Chen Liang
• Withdrawn: 8355938: Addressed rare lost unpark bug 8074773 by pre-loading LockSupport.class duke
• RFR: 8361519: Obsolete Unicode Scalar Value link in Character class Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8361519: Obsolete Unicode Scalar Value link in Character class Iris Clark
  • Re: RFR: 8361519: Obsolete Unicode Scalar Value link in Character class [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8361519: Obsolete Unicode Scalar Value link in Character class [v2] Iris Clark

• Earlier messages
• Later messages