core-libs-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: RFR: 8392400: CompactNumberFormat.format(BigDecimal) formats inconsistently compared to format(double) [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8392400: CompactNumberFormat.format(BigDecimal) formats inconsistently compared to format(double) [v3] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8392400: CompactNumberFormat.format(BigDecimal) formats inconsistently compared to format(double) [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8392400: CompactNumberFormat.format(BigDecimal) formats inconsistently compared to format(double) [v4] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8392400: CompactNumberFormat.format(BigDecimal) formats inconsistently compared to format(double) [v5] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8392400: CompactNumberFormat.format(BigDecimal) formats inconsistently compared to format(double) [v5] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8392400: CompactNumberFormat.format(BigDecimal) formats inconsistently compared to format(double) [v6] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8392400: CompactNumberFormat.format(BigDecimal) formats inconsistently compared to format(double) [v6] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8392400: CompactNumberFormat.format(BigDecimal) formats inconsistently compared to format(double) [v6] Justin Lu
  • Integrated: 8392400: CompactNumberFormat.format(BigDecimal) formats inconsistently compared to format(double) Justin Lu
• Re: RFR: 8380361: Display -XshowSettings configuration data via jcmd [v9] Kieran Farrell
  • Re: RFR: 8380361: Display -XshowSettings configuration data via jcmd [v9] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8380361: Display -XshowSettings configuration data via jcmd [v9] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8380361: Display -XshowSettings configuration data via jcmd [v9] Kieran Farrell
  • Re: RFR: 8380361: Display -XshowSettings configuration data via jcmd [v9] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8380361: Display -XshowSettings configuration data via jcmd [v9] Kieran Farrell
• Re: RFR: 8380567: DynamicCallSiteDesc.bootstrapMethod should return DirectMethodHandleDesc [v2] Chen Liang
• Re: RFR: 8380567: DynamicCallSiteDesc.bootstrapMethod should return DirectMethodHandleDesc [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8380567: DynamicCallSiteDesc.bootstrapMethod should return DirectMethodHandleDesc [v3] Vicente Romero
  • Re: RFR: 8380567: DynamicCallSiteDesc.bootstrapMethod should return DirectMethodHandleDesc [v3] ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8380567: DynamicCallSiteDesc.bootstrapMethod should return DirectMethodHandleDesc [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8380567: DynamicCallSiteDesc.bootstrapMethod should return DirectMethodHandleDesc [v3] Chen Liang
• Re: RFR: 8339188: Javac should issue a compiler error when a value class overrides Object::finalize [v12] Vicente Romero
• Re: RFR: 8339188: Javac should issue a compiler error when a value class overrides Object::finalize [v13] Vicente Romero
• RFR: 8389321: Clarify jlink options Dušan Bálek
  • Re: RFR: 8389321: Clarify jlink options [v2] Dušan Bálek
  • Re: RFR: 8389321: Clarify jlink options Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: 8389321: Clarify jlink options Severin Gehwolf
  • Re: RFR: 8389321: Clarify jlink options Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: 8389321: Clarify jlink options [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8389321: Clarify jlink options [v2] Pavel Rappo
  • Re: RFR: 8389321: Clarify jlink options [v2] Dušan Bálek
  • Re: RFR: 8389321: Clarify jlink options [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8389321: Clarify jlink options [v2] Dušan Bálek
  • Re: RFR: 8389321: Clarify jlink options [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8389321: Clarify jlink options [v2] Dušan Bálek
  • Re: RFR: 8389321: Clarify jlink options [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8389321: Clarify jlink options [v2] Dušan Bálek
  • Re: RFR: 8389321: Clarify jlink options [v3] Dušan Bálek
  • Re: RFR: 8389321: Clarify jlink options [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8389321: Clarify jlink options [v4] Dušan Bálek
  • Re: RFR: 8389321: Clarify jlink options [v3] Dušan Bálek
  • Re: RFR: 8389321: Clarify jlink options [v4] Dušan Bálek
  • Re: RFR: 8389321: Clarify jlink options [v4] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8389321: Clarify jlink options [v4] Dušan Bálek
  • Re: RFR: 8389321: Clarify jlink options [v5] Dušan Bálek
  • Re: RFR: 8389321: Clarify jlink options [v5] Alan Bateman
  • Integrated: 8389321: Clarify jlink options Dušan Bálek
• RFR: 8391651: VarHandle CAS on flattened nullable empty-value field throws IllegalArgumentException Johan Sjölen
  • Re: RFR: 8391651: VarHandle CAS on flattened nullable empty-value field throws IllegalArgumentException Frederic Parain
  • Re: RFR: 8391651: VarHandle CAS on flattened nullable empty-value field throws IllegalArgumentException Casper Norrbin
  • Re: RFR: 8391651: VarHandle CAS on flattened nullable empty-value field throws IllegalArgumentException [v2] Johan Sjölen
  • Re: RFR: 8391651: VarHandle CAS on flattened nullable empty-value field throws IllegalArgumentException [v2] Casper Norrbin
  • Re: RFR: 8391651: VarHandle CAS on flattened nullable empty-value field throws IllegalArgumentException [v2] Frederic Parain
  • Re: RFR: 8391651: VarHandle CAS on flattened nullable empty-value field throws IllegalArgumentException [v2] Johan Sjölen
  • Integrated: 8391651: VarHandle CAS on flattened nullable empty-value field throws IllegalArgumentException Johan Sjölen
• RFR: 8392541: Remove the internal BufferStack and CaptureStateUtil Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8392541: Remove the internal BufferStack and CaptureStateUtil Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8392541: Remove the internal BufferStack and CaptureStateUtil Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8392541: Remove the internal BufferStack and CaptureStateUtil [v2] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8392541: Remove the internal BufferStack and CaptureStateUtil [v2] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8392541: Remove the internal BufferStack and CaptureStateUtil [v3] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8392541: Remove the internal BufferStack and CaptureStateUtil [v3] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8392541: Remove the internal BufferStack and CaptureStateUtil [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8392541: Remove the internal BufferStack and CaptureStateUtil [v3] ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8392541: Remove the internal BufferStack and CaptureStateUtil [v4] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8392541: Remove the internal BufferStack and CaptureStateUtil [v4] Jorn Vernee
• [External] : jpackage --date option? Rafael Winterhalter
  • Re: [External] : jpackage --date option? Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: [External] : jpackage --date option? Alan Bateman
  • Re: [External] : jpackage --date option? Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: [External] : jpackage --date option? Rafael Winterhalter
  • Re: [External] : jpackage --date option? Alexey Semenyuk
• Re: RFR: 8160821: VarHandle accesses are penalized when argument conversion is required [v13] Leonid Mesnik
• Re: RFR: 8339188: Javac should issue a compiler error when a value class overrides Object::finalize [v11] Vicente Romero
• RFR: 8387852: Typo in LauncherHelper.validateOption Kieran Farrell
  • Re: RFR: 8387852: Typo in LauncherHelper.validateOption Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8387852: Typo in LauncherHelper.validateOption Kieran Farrell
  • Re: RFR: 8387852: Typo in LauncherHelper.validateOption Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8387852: Typo in LauncherHelper.validateOption Kieran Farrell
  • Re: RFR: 8387852: Typo in LauncherHelper.validateOption duke
  • Integrated: 8387852: Typo in LauncherHelper.validateOption Kieran Farrell
• RFR: 8385944: Test java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java#id0 failed - Incorrect handling of envstrings containing NULs Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8385944: Test java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java#id0 failed - Incorrect handling of envstrings containing NULs [v2] Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8385944: Test java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java#id0 failed - Incorrect handling of envstrings containing NULs [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8385944: Test java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java#id0 failed - Incorrect handling of envstrings containing NULs [v2] Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8385944: Test java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java#id0 failed - Incorrect handling of envstrings containing NULs Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8385944: Test java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java#id0 failed - Incorrect handling of envstrings containing NULs [v2] Daniel Jeliński
  • Integrated: 8385944: Test java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java#id0 failed - Incorrect handling of envstrings containing NULs Daniel Jeliński
• RFR: 8381878: Misleading macro ALLOC in jspawnhelper.c Daniel Jeliński
• Re: RFR: 8303762: Optimize vector slice operation with constant index using VPALIGNR instruction [v26] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8303762: Optimize vector slice operation with constant index using VPALIGNR instruction [v26] Sandhya Viswanathan
  • Re: RFR: 8303762: Optimize vector slice operation with constant index using VPALIGNR instruction [v26] Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: RFR: 8303762: Optimize vector slice operation with constant index using VPALIGNR instruction [v26] Eric Fang
  • Re: RFR: 8303762: Optimize vector slice operation with constant index using VPALIGNR instruction [v26] Quan Anh Mai
• Withdrawn: 8387769: GZIPInputStream tests should succeed with tryReadAheadAfterTrailer true and false duke
• RFR: 8392377: (tz) Update Timezone Data to 2026d Min Choi
  • Re: RFR: 8392377: (tz) Update Timezone Data to 2026d Andrew John Hughes
  • Re: RFR: 8392377: (tz) Update Timezone Data to 2026d Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8392377: (tz) Update Timezone Data to 2026d Andrew John Hughes
  • Re: RFR: 8392377: (tz) Update Timezone Data to 2026d Min Choi
  • Re: RFR: 8392377: (tz) Update Timezone Data to 2026d Andrew John Hughes
  • Re: RFR: 8392377: (tz) Update Timezone Data to 2026d Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8392377: (tz) Update Timezone Data to 2026d Min Choi
  • Re: RFR: 8392377: (tz) Update Timezone Data to 2026d duke
  • Integrated: 8392377: (tz) Update Timezone Data to 2026d Min Choi
• [External] : Status of JLink support for @argfiles in Tool API Rafael Winterhalter
• RFR: 8391552: Exchanger throughput regressed ~27x in JDK 24 (pairwise handoff) on macOS Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8391552: Exchanger throughput regressed ~27x in JDK 24 (pairwise handoff) on macOS Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8391552: Exchanger throughput regressed ~27x in JDK 24 (pairwise handoff) on macOS [v2] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8391552: Exchanger throughput regressed ~27x in JDK 24 (pairwise handoff) on macOS [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8391552: Exchanger throughput regressed ~27x in JDK 24 (pairwise handoff) on macOS [v2] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8391552: Exchanger throughput regressed ~27x in JDK 24 (pairwise handoff) on macOS Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8391552: Exchanger throughput regressed ~27x in JDK 24 (pairwise handoff) on macOS Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8391552: Exchanger throughput regressed ~27x in JDK 24 (pairwise handoff) on macOS Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8391552: Exchanger throughput regressed ~27x in JDK 24 (pairwise handoff) on macOS Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8391552: Exchanger throughput regressed ~27x in JDK 24 (pairwise handoff) on macOS Doug Lea
  • Re: RFR: 8391552: Exchanger throughput regressed ~27x in JDK 24 (pairwise handoff) on macOS [v2] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8391552: Exchanger throughput regressed ~27x in JDK 24 (pairwise handoff) on macOS [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8391552: Exchanger throughput regressed ~27x in JDK 24 (pairwise handoff) on macOS [v2] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8391552: Exchanger throughput regressed ~27x in JDK 24 (pairwise handoff) on macOS [v3] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8391552: Exchanger throughput regressed ~27x in JDK 24 (pairwise handoff) on macOS [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Integrated: 8391552: Exchanger throughput regressed ~27x in JDK 24 (pairwise handoff) on macOS Viktor Klang
• Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v128] Doug Lea
• RFR: 8392389: TestPids.java fails as "--pids-limit=0" caps max number of threads to 1 Ivan Bereziuk
  • Re: RFR: 8392389: TestPids.java fails as "--pids-limit=0" caps max number of threads to 1 Ivan Bereziuk
  • Re: RFR: 8392389: TestPids.java fails as "--pids-limit=0" caps max number of threads to 1 [v2] Ivan Bereziuk
  • Re: RFR: 8392389: TestPids.java fails as "--pids-limit=0" caps max number of threads to 1 [v2] Severin Gehwolf
  • Re: RFR: 8392389: TestPids.java fails as "--pids-limit=0" caps max number of threads to 1 [v2] Casper Norrbin
  • Re: RFR: 8392389: TestPids.java fails as "--pids-limit=0" caps max number of threads to 1 [v2] Ivan Bereziuk
  • Re: RFR: 8392389: TestPids.java fails as "--pids-limit=0" caps max number of threads to 1 [v2] duke
  • Re: RFR: 8392389: TestPids.java fails as "--pids-limit=0" caps max number of threads to 1 Severin Gehwolf
  • Integrated: 8392389: TestPids.java fails as "--pids-limit=0" caps max number of threads to 1 Ivan Bereziuk
• Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v127] Doug Lea
• RFR: 8391460: Implement JEP 543: Structured Concurrency Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8391460: Implement JEP 543: Structured Concurrency Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8391460: Implement JEP 543: Structured Concurrency Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8391460: Implement JEP 543: Structured Concurrency ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8391460: Implement JEP 543: Structured Concurrency Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8391460: Implement JEP 543: Structured Concurrency Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8391460: Implement JEP 543: Structured Concurrency Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8391460: Implement JEP 543: Structured Concurrency [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8391460: Implement JEP 543: Structured Concurrency [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8391460: Implement JEP 543: Structured Concurrency [v3] Rémi Forax
• Re: RFR: 8303762: Optimize vector slice operation with constant index using VPALIGNR instruction [v25] Jatin Bhateja
• RFR: 8392075: ConcurrentHashMap may permanently stop resizing Fabian Meumertzheim
  • Re: RFR: 8392075: ConcurrentHashMap may permanently stop resizing Fabian Meumertzheim
  • Re: RFR: 8392075: ConcurrentHashMap may permanently stop resizing Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8392075: ConcurrentHashMap may permanently stop resizing Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8392075: ConcurrentHashMap may permanently stop resizing Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8392075: ConcurrentHashMap may permanently stop resizing Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8392075: ConcurrentHashMap may permanently stop resizing Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8392075: ConcurrentHashMap may permanently stop resizing Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8392075: ConcurrentHashMap may permanently stop resizing duke
  • Re: RFR: 8392075: ConcurrentHashMap may permanently stop resizing Viktor Klang
  • Integrated: 8392075: ConcurrentHashMap may permanently stop resizing Fabian Meumertzheim
  • Re: RFR: 8392075: ConcurrentHashMap may permanently stop resizing Doug Lea
• RFR: 8392079: ConcurrentSkipListMap.lowerKey() has non-linearizable outcomes Fabian Meumertzheim
  • Re: RFR: 8392079: ConcurrentSkipListMap.lowerKey() has non-linearizable outcomes Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8392079: ConcurrentSkipListMap.lowerKey() has non-linearizable outcomes Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8392079: ConcurrentSkipListMap.lowerKey() has non-linearizable outcomes Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8392079: ConcurrentSkipListMap.lowerKey() has non-linearizable outcomes [v2] Fabian Meumertzheim
  • Re: RFR: 8392079: ConcurrentSkipListMap.lowerKey() has non-linearizable outcomes [v2] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8392079: ConcurrentSkipListMap.lowerKey() has non-linearizable outcomes [v2] Fabian Meumertzheim
  • Re: RFR: 8392079: ConcurrentSkipListMap.lowerKey() has non-linearizable outcomes [v2] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8392079: ConcurrentSkipListMap.lowerKey() has non-linearizable outcomes [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8392079: ConcurrentSkipListMap.lowerKey() has non-linearizable outcomes [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8392079: ConcurrentSkipListMap.lowerKey() has non-linearizable outcomes [v2] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8392079: ConcurrentSkipListMap.lowerKey() has non-linearizable outcomes [v2] duke
  • Re: RFR: 8392079: ConcurrentSkipListMap.lowerKey() has non-linearizable outcomes [v2] Viktor Klang
  • Integrated: 8392079: ConcurrentSkipListMap.lowerKey() has non-linearizable outcomes Fabian Meumertzheim
• RFR: 8392085: ConcurrentSkipListMap.clone() on an emptied map shares state Fabian Meumertzheim
  • Re: RFR: 8392085: ConcurrentSkipListMap.clone() on an emptied map shares state Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8392085: ConcurrentSkipListMap.clone() on an emptied map shares state Fabian Meumertzheim
  • Re: RFR: 8392085: ConcurrentSkipListMap.clone() on an emptied map shares state Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8392085: ConcurrentSkipListMap.clone() on an emptied map shares state Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8392085: ConcurrentSkipListMap.clone() on an emptied map shares state Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8392085: ConcurrentSkipListMap.clone() on an emptied map shares state duke
  • Integrated: 8392085: ConcurrentSkipListMap.clone() on an emptied map shares state Fabian Meumertzheim
  • Re: RFR: 8392085: ConcurrentSkipListMap.clone() on an emptied map shares state Per Minborg
• Re: RFR: 8374364: TestCgroupMetrics.java fails when cpuset unmounted [v15] sendaoYan
• [External] : Minor improvements to java.util.Properties? Rafael Winterhalter
  • Re: [External] : Minor improvements to java.util.Properties? Alan Bateman
  • Re: [External] : Minor improvements to java.util.Properties? Rafael Winterhalter
  • Re: [External] : Minor improvements to java.util.Properties? Alan Bateman
  • Re: [External] : Minor improvements to java.util.Properties? Daniel Gredler
• RFR: 8163004: MethodHandles should have synchronization combinator Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8163004: MethodHandles should have synchronization combinator ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8163004: MethodHandles should have synchronization combinator Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8163004: MethodHandles should have synchronization combinator Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8163004: MethodHandles should have synchronization combinator Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8163004: MethodHandles should have synchronization combinator [v2] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8163004: MethodHandles should have synchronization combinator [v2] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8163004: Add a synchronization combinator to java.lang.invoke.MethodHandles [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8163004: MethodHandles should have synchronization combinator Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8163004: MethodHandles should have synchronization combinator [v2] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8163004: MethodHandles should have synchronization combinator [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8163004: MethodHandles should have synchronization combinator [v2] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8163004: Add a synchronization combinator to java.lang.invoke.MethodHandles [v2] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8163004: MethodHandles should have synchronization combinator [v2] Chen Liang

• Earlier messages
• Later messages