core-libs-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: RFR: 8395714: Excessive PreparedStatement creation in CachedRowSetWriter [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8395714: Excessive PreparedStatement creation in CachedRowSetWriter [v2] Lance Andersen
  • Re: RFR: 8395714: Excessive PreparedStatement creation in CachedRowSetWriter [v2] Justin Lu
  • Integrated: 8395714: Excessive PreparedStatement creation in CachedRowSetWriter Justin Lu
• RFR: 8396047: build.tools.spp.Spp invocations leave untracked files behind Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8396047: build.tools.spp.Spp invocations leave untracked files behind [v2] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8396047: build.tools.spp.Spp invocations leave untracked files behind [v2] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8396047: build.tools.spp.Spp invocations leave untracked files behind [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8396047: build.tools.spp.Spp invocations leave untracked files behind [v2] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8396047: build.tools.spp.Spp invocations leave untracked files behind [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8396047: build.tools.spp.Spp invocations leave untracked files behind [v2] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8396047: build.tools.spp.Spp invocations leave untracked files behind [v2] Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8396047: build.tools.spp.Spp invocations leave untracked files behind [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Integrated: 8396047: build.tools.spp.Spp invocations leave untracked files behind Volkan Yazici
• RFR: 8395868: C2: Optimize String.equals for small constant strings Jasmine Karthikeyan
• RFR: 8396048: (tz) Update to tzdata2026f Min Choi
  • Re: RFR: 8396048: (tz) Update to tzdata2026f Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8396048: (tz) Update to tzdata2026f Min Choi
  • Re: RFR: 8396048: (tz) Update to tzdata2026f duke
  • Integrated: 8396048: (tz) Update to tzdata2026f Min Choi
• RFR: 8396056: Ship Vector classes as value classes for preview Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8396056: Ship Vector classes as value classes for preview Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8396056: Ship Vector classes as value classes for preview Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8396056: Ship Vector classes as value classes for preview ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8396056: Ship Vector classes as value classes for preview [v2] Rémi Forax
  • Re: RFR: 8396056: Ship Vector classes as value classes for preview [v2] ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8396056: Ship Vector classes as value classes for preview [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8396056: Ship Vector classes as value classes for preview [v2] ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8396056: Ship Vector classes as value classes for preview [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8396056: Ship Vector classes as value classes for preview [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8396056: Ship Vector classes as value classes for preview [v4] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8396056: Ship Vector classes as value classes for preview [v4] Paul Sandoz
• RFR: 8396054: ProblemList tools/launcher/MiscTests.java with virtual threads Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: RFR: 8396054: ProblemList tools/launcher/MiscTests.java with virtual threads Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: RFR: 8396054: ProblemList tools/launcher/MiscTests.java with virtual threads Jesper Wilhelmsson
  • Integrated: 8396054: ProblemList tools/launcher/MiscTests.java with virtual threads Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: RFR: 8396054: ProblemList tools/launcher/MiscTests.java with virtual threads Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: RFR: 8396054: ProblemList tools/launcher/MiscTests.java with virtual threads Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8396054: ProblemList tools/launcher/MiscTests.java with virtual threads Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: RFR: 8396054: ProblemList tools/launcher/MiscTests.java with virtual threads Jaikiran Pai
• RFR: 8396060: Convert VectorShape to an interface Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8396060: Convert VectorShape to an interface Paul Sandoz
• RFR: 8336664: Consider adding sign information to value layouts Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8336664: Consider adding sign information to value layouts Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8336664: Consider adding sign information to value layouts Martin Doerr
  • Re: RFR: 8336664: Consider adding sign information to value layouts Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8336664: Consider adding sign information to value layouts Martin Doerr
  • Re: RFR: 8336664: Consider adding sign information to value layouts Martin Doerr
  • Re: RFR: 8336664: Consider adding sign information to value layouts Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8336664: Consider adding sign information to value layouts Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8336664: Consider adding sign information to value layouts ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8336664: Consider adding sign information to value layouts [v4] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8336664: Consider adding sign information to value layouts [v4] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8336664: Consider adding sign information to value layouts [v4] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8336664: Consider adding sign information to value layouts [v4] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8336664: Consider adding sign information to value layouts Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8336664: Consider adding sign information to value layouts [v2] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8336664: Consider adding sign information to value layouts [v2] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8336664: Consider adding sign information to value layouts [v3] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8336664: Consider adding sign information to value layouts [v3] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8336664: Consider adding sign information to value layouts [v3] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8336664: Consider adding sign information to value layouts [v3] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8336664: Consider adding sign information to value layouts [v5] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8336664: Consider adding sign information to value layouts [v5] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8336664: Consider adding sign information to value layouts [v5] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8336664: Consider adding sign information to value layouts [v5] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8336664: Consider adding sign information to value layouts [v5] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8336664: Consider adding sign information to value layouts [v5] ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8336664: Consider adding sign information to value layouts [v5] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8336664: Consider adding sign information to value layouts [v6] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8336664: Consider adding sign information to value layouts [v7] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8336664: Consider adding sign information to value layouts [v7] Martin Doerr
  • Re: RFR: 8336664: Consider adding sign information to value layouts [v7] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8336664: Consider adding sign information to value layouts [v7] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8336664: Consider adding sign information to value layouts [v8] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8336664: Add sign information to value layouts [v12] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8336664: Add sign information to value layouts [v9] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8336664: Add sign information to value layouts [v9] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8336664: Add sign information to value layouts [v9] Martin Doerr
  • Re: RFR: 8336664: Add sign information to value layouts [v9] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8336664: Add sign information to value layouts [v11] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8336664: Add sign information to value layouts [v13] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8336664: Add sign information to value layouts [v13] Martin Doerr
  • Re: RFR: 8336664: Add sign information to value layouts [v13] Martin Doerr
  • Re: RFR: 8336664: Add sign information to value layouts [v13] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8336664: Add sign information to value layouts [v13] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8336664: Add sign information to value layouts [v10] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8336664: Add sign information to value layouts [v10] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8336664: Add sign information to value layouts [v14] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8336664: Add sign information to value layouts [v14] Martin Doerr
  • Re: RFR: 8336664: Add sign information to value layouts [v14] Amit Kumar
  • Re: RFR: 8336664: Add sign information to value layouts [v14] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8336664: Add sign information to value layouts [v15] Jorn Vernee
• RFR: 8395882: Currency.getInstance(Locale) compiles a regex on every call Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8395882: Currency.getInstance(Locale) compiles a regex on every call [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8395882: Currency.getInstance(Locale) compiles a regex on every call [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8395882: Currency.getInstance(Locale) compiles a regex on every call Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8395882: Currency.getInstance(Locale) compiles a regex on every call [v2] Justin Lu
  • Integrated: 8395882: Currency.getInstance(Locale) compiles a regex on every call Justin Lu
• RFR: 8268665: Deprecate Hashtable and ConcurrentHashMap.contains(Object) Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8268665: Deprecate Hashtable.contains and ConcurrentHashMap.contains methods [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8268665: Deprecate Hashtable.contains and ConcurrentHashMap.contains methods [v2] Stuart Marks
  • Re: RFR: 8268665: Deprecate Hashtable.contains and ConcurrentHashMap.contains methods [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8268665: Deprecate Hashtable.contains and ConcurrentHashMap.contains methods [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8268665: Deprecate Hashtable.contains and ConcurrentHashMap.contains methods [v3] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8268665: Deprecate Hashtable.contains and ConcurrentHashMap.contains methods [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8268665: Deprecate Hashtable.contains and ConcurrentHashMap.contains methods [v3] Stuart Marks
  • Re: RFR: 8268665: Deprecate Hashtable.contains and ConcurrentHashMap.contains methods [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8268665: Deprecate Hashtable.contains and ConcurrentHashMap.contains methods [v4] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8268665: Deprecate Hashtable.contains and ConcurrentHashMap.contains methods [v4] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8268665: Deprecate Hashtable.contains and ConcurrentHashMap.contains methods [v4] Stuart Marks
  • Re: RFR: 8268665: Deprecate Hashtable.contains and ConcurrentHashMap.contains methods [v5] Chen Liang
• RFR: 8395750: CachedRowSetWriter.buildWhereClause documentation is incorrect Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8395750: CachedRowSetWriter.buildWhereClause documentation is incorrect [v3] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8395750: CachedRowSetWriter.buildWhereClause documentation is incorrect [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8395750: CachedRowSetWriter.buildWhereClause documentation is incorrect [v3] Lance Andersen
  • Re: RFR: 8395750: CachedRowSetWriter.buildWhereClause documentation is incorrect [v3] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8395750: CachedRowSetWriter.buildWhereClause documentation is incorrect [v2] Justin Lu
  • Integrated: 8395750: CachedRowSetWriter.buildWhereClause documentation is incorrect Justin Lu
• RFR: 8395909: Make the test failure_handler take an early native thread stack dump Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8395909: Make the test failure_handler take an early native thread stack dump David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8395909: Make the test failure_handler take an early native thread stack dump Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8395909: Make the test failure_handler take an early native thread stack dump David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8395909: Make the test failure_handler take an early native thread stack dump Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8395909: Make the test failure_handler take an early native thread stack dump Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8395909: Make the test failure_handler take an early native thread stack dump [v2] Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8395909: Make the test failure_handler take an early native thread stack dump [v2] Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8395909: Make the test failure_handler take an early native thread stack dump [v2] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8395909: Make the test failure_handler take an early native thread stack dump [v2] Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8395909: Make the test failure_handler take an early native thread stack dump [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8395909: Make the test failure_handler take an early native thread stack dump [v3] Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8395909: Make the test failure_handler take an early native thread stack dump [v3] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8395909: Make the test failure_handler take an early native thread stack dump [v3] Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8395909: Make the test failure_handler take an early native thread stack dump [v3] Stefan Karlsson
  • Re: RFR: 8395909: Make the test failure_handler take an early native thread stack dump [v3] Stefan Karlsson
  • Integrated: 8395909: Make the test failure_handler take an early native thread stack dump Stefan Karlsson
• RFR: 8395898: Test java/util/concurrent/forkjoin/AsyncShutdownNowInvokeAnyRace.java should handle exceptions before pool is closed Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8395898: Test java/util/concurrent/forkjoin/AsyncShutdownNowInvokeAnyRace.java should handle exceptions before pool is closed Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8395898: Test java/util/concurrent/forkjoin/AsyncShutdownNowInvokeAnyRace.java should handle exceptions before pool is closed Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8395898: Test java/util/concurrent/forkjoin/AsyncShutdownNowInvokeAnyRace.java should handle exceptions before pool is closed Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8395898: Test java/util/concurrent/forkjoin/AsyncShutdownNowInvokeAnyRace.java should handle exceptions before pool is closed Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8395898: Test java/util/concurrent/forkjoin/AsyncShutdownNowInvokeAnyRace.java should handle exceptions before pool is closed Viktor Klang
  • Integrated: 8395898: Test java/util/concurrent/forkjoin/AsyncShutdownNowInvokeAnyRace.java should handle exceptions before pool is closed Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8395898: Test java/util/concurrent/forkjoin/AsyncShutdownNowInvokeAnyRace.java should handle exceptions before pool is closed Alan Bateman
• RFR: 8395712: JDK-8386428 is incomplete Mat Carter
  • Re: RFR: 8395712: JDK-8386428 is incomplete Mat Carter
  • Re: RFR: 8395712: JDK-8386428 is incomplete Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8395712: JDK-8386428 is incomplete Mat Carter
  • Re: RFR: 8395712: LinkedTransferQueue.tryMatchData should use getVolatileWaiter, missed from JDK-8386428 Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8395712: LinkedTransferQueue.tryMatchData should use getVolatileWaiter, missed from JDK-8386428 Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8395712: LinkedTransferQueue.tryMatchData should use getVolatileWaiter, missed from JDK-8386428 Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8395712: LinkedTransferQueue.tryMatchData should use getVolatileWaiter, missed from JDK-8386428 [v2] Mat Carter
  • Re: RFR: 8395712: LinkedTransferQueue.tryMatchData should use getVolatileWaiter, missed from JDK-8386428 Doug Lea
  • Re: RFR: 8395712: LinkedTransferQueue.tryMatchData should use getVolatileWaiter, missed from JDK-8386428 Mat Carter
  • Re: RFR: 8395712: LinkedTransferQueue.tryMatchData should use getVolatileWaiter, missed from JDK-8386428 Doug Lea
  • Re: RFR: 8395712: LinkedTransferQueue.tryMatchData should use getVolatileWaiter, missed from JDK-8386428 [v2] Mat Carter
  • Re: RFR: 8395712: LinkedTransferQueue.tryMatchData should use getVolatileWaiter, missed from JDK-8386428 [v3] Mat Carter
  • Re: RFR: 8395712: LinkedTransferQueue.tryMatchData should use getVolatileWaiter, missed from JDK-8386428 [v3] Mat Carter
  • Re: RFR: 8395712: LinkedTransferQueue.tryMatchData should use getVolatileWaiter, missed from JDK-8386428 [v3] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8395712: LinkedTransferQueue.tryMatchData should use getVolatileWaiter, missed from JDK-8386428 [v3] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8395712: LinkedTransferQueue.tryMatchData should use getVolatileWaiter, missed from JDK-8386428 [v3] Mat Carter
  • Re: RFR: 8395712: LinkedTransferQueue.tryMatchData should use getVolatileWaiter, missed from JDK-8386428 [v3] Viktor Klang
  • Integrated: 8395712: LinkedTransferQueue.tryMatchData should use getVolatileWaiter, missed from JDK-8386428 Mat Carter
• RFR: 8389755: VectorAPI Vector Javadoc Implementation notes incorrect Stuart Monteith
  • Re: RFR: 8389755: VectorAPI Vector Javadoc Implementation notes incorrect Jean-Noël Rouvignac
  • Re: RFR: 8389755: VectorAPI Vector Javadoc Implementation notes incorrect Stuart Monteith
  • Re: RFR: 8389755: VectorAPI Vector Javadoc Implementation notes incorrect Jean-Noël Rouvignac
• Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v137] Doug Lea
• RFR: 8395827: [Valhalla] New Unsafe paths should be @ForceInline Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8395827: [Valhalla] New Unsafe paths should be @ForceInline [v2] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8395827: [Valhalla] New Unsafe paths should be @ForceInline [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8395827: [Valhalla] New Unsafe paths should be @ForceInline [v2] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8395827: [Valhalla] New Unsafe paths should be @ForceInline [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8395827: [Valhalla] New Unsafe paths should be @ForceInline [v2] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8395827: [Valhalla] New Unsafe paths should be @ForceInline [v2] Albert Mingkun Yang
  • Re: RFR: 8395827: [Valhalla] New Unsafe paths should be @ForceInline [v2] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Integrated: 8395827: [Valhalla] New Unsafe paths should be @ForceInline Aleksey Shipilev
• RFR: 8393262: Re-examine sun.reflect.ReflectionFactory::newConstructorForSerialization methods Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8393262: Re-examine sun.reflect.ReflectionFactory::newConstructorForSerialization methods Chen Liang
  • Integrated: 8393262: Re-examine sun.reflect.ReflectionFactory::newConstructorForSerialization methods Alan Bateman
• RFR: 8393235: Module$ReflectionData.reads is missing from AOT cache Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8393235: Module$ReflectionData.reads is missing from AOT cache Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8393235: Module$ReflectionData.reads is missing from AOT cache Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8393235: Module$ReflectionData.reads is missing from AOT cache [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8393235: Module$ReflectionData.reads is missing from AOT cache [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8393235: Module$ReflectionData.reads is missing from AOT cache [v2] Ioi Lam
  • Integrated: 8393235: Module$ReflectionData.reads is missing from AOT cache Alan Bateman
• Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v136] Doug Lea
• RFR: 8395355: Prepare tests for JEP: Disallow the Dynamic Loading of Agents by Default Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8395355: Update tests to not rely on the default value of EnableDynamicAgentLoading Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8395355: Update tests to not rely on the default value of EnableDynamicAgentLoading [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8395355: Update tests to not rely on the default value of EnableDynamicAgentLoading [v3] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8395355: Update tests to not rely on the default value of EnableDynamicAgentLoading [v3] Chris Plummer
• RFR: 8384532: Update CLDR to Version 49 Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8384532: Update CLDR to Version 49 [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8384532: Update CLDR to Version 49 [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8384532: Update CLDR to Version 49 [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8384532: Update CLDR to Version 49 [v3] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8384532: Update CLDR to Version 49 [v3] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8384532: Update CLDR to Version 49 [v3] Naoto Sato

• Earlier messages
• Later messages