On Wed, 6 Jul 2022 05:59:21 GMT, Alan Bateman <al...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> xpbob has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit >> since the last revision: >> >> update header > > It's not clear that introducing this as a standard API is the right thing to > do. Are you 100% confident that the concepts of "CPU quota", "CPU shares", > "CPU period", "soft limit" etc. will last the test of time and that we don't > be back here next year with another PR to deprecate or replace this API? I > don't disagree that exposing a MXBean could be useful for > monitoring/management purposes but I think we have to be cautious getting > getting locked in. A possible starting point for prototyping purposes and > getting feedback is a JDK-specific MXBean (module jdk.management). > @AlanBateman @jerboaa That's a good idea.Adding a special bean is only > available on Linux systems.I do not know the process of creating a CSR, can > you help me create a CSR See https://wiki.openjdk.org/display/csr/CSR+FAQs ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/9372
