On Mon, 1 Aug 2022 17:35:05 GMT, David Schlosnagle <d...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> I would like to contribute an optimized version of 
>> `StackTraceElement#toString()` that uses a single StringBuilder throughout 
>> creation to avoid intermediate `String` allocations. 
>> `StackTraceElement#toString()` is used in a number of JDK code paths 
>> including `Throwable#printStackTrace()`, as well as many JDK consumers may 
>> transform `StackTraceElement` `toString()` in logging frameworks capturing 
>> throwables and exceptions, and diagnostics performing dumps.
>> 
>> Given this usage and some observed JFR profiles from production services, 
>> I'd like to reduce the intermediate allocations to reduce CPU pressure in 
>> these circumstances. I have added a couple benchmarks for a sample 
>> `Throwable#printStackTrace()` converted to String via `StringWriter` and 
>> individual `StackTraceElement` `toString`. The former shows ~15% 
>> improvement, while the latter shows ~40% improvement.
>> 
>> Before
>> 
>> Benchmark                               Mode  Cnt       Score      Error  
>> Units
>> StackTraceElementBench.printStackTrace  avgt   15  167147.066 ± 4260.521  
>> ns/op
>> StackTraceElementBench.toString         avgt   15     132.781 ±    2.095  
>> ns/op
>> 
>> 
>> After
>> 
>> Benchmark                               Mode  Cnt       Score      Error  
>> Units
>> StackTraceElementBench.printStackTrace  avgt   15  142909.133 ± 2290.720  
>> ns/op
>> StackTraceElementBench.toString         avgt   15      78.939 ±    0.469  
>> ns/op
>
> David Schlosnagle has updated the pull request incrementally with one 
> additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Address comments

Since constructing a `String` from a `StringBuilder` requires an array copy 
anyway, you don't need to be exact in the capacity of the builder and 
overshooting is fine. This can simplify the length calculation a lot. Thanks.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/9665

Reply via email to