On Tue, 18 Oct 2022 02:03:06 GMT, Mandy Chung <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Ioi Lam has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge
>> or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought
>> in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains four additional commits
>> since the last revision:
>>
>> - Merge branch 'master' into
>> 8295302-no-arraylist-for-single-classdata-for-lambdaform
>> - @mlchung comments
>> - @iwanowww comments
>> - 8295302: Do not use ArrayList when LambdaForm has a single ClassData
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/invoke/InvokerBytecodeGenerator.java
> line 346:
>
>> 344:
>> 345: /**
>> 346: * Returns an object to pass this.classData to the <clinit> method
>> of the
>
> What about:
>
> Suggestion:
>
> * Returns the class data object that will be passed to
> `Lookup.defineHiddenClass`.
> * The classData is loaded in the <clinit> method of the generated class.
> * If the class data contains only one single object, this method returns
> that single object.
> * If the class data contains more than one objects, this method returns
> a List.
> *
> * This method returns null if no class data.
Actually, the classData is passed here:
private MemberName loadMethod(byte[] classFile) {
Class<?> invokerClass = LOOKUP.makeHiddenClassDefiner(className,
classFile, Set.of())
.defineClass(true, classDataValues());
return resolveInvokerMember(invokerClass, invokerName, invokerType);
}
So it doesn't go through `Lookup.defineHiddenClass`.
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10706
