On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 06:05:40 GMT, Jaikiran Pai <j...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Can I please get a review of this change which proposes to fix 
>> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8292317?
>> 
>> The `java.util.Iterator` has a `forEachRemaining(Consumer<? super E> 
>> action)` method. As per its contract, the implementations are expected to 
>> throw a `NullPointerException` if the passed `action` is `null`.
>> 
>> `java.util.Collections` has a couple of places where it wraps the passed 
>> `action` into another and passes that wrapped `action` to the underlying 
>> `java.util.Iterator`'s default `forEachRemaining` implementation which is:
>> 
>> 
>> Objects.requireNonNull(action);
>>   while (hasNext())
>>       action.accept(next());
>> 
>> Since the passed `action` is now a non-null wrapper, the implementation goes 
>> ahead and advances the iterator to the next entry and invokes on the 
>> non-null `action` to carry out its action. That non-null wrapper action then 
>> calls the `null` user passed action and runs into an expected 
>> `NullPointerException`. However, at this point the iterator has already 
>> advanced and that is what the bug is.
>> 
>> The commit in this PR introduces a trivial null check on the `action` very 
>> early in the call even before wrapping such an `action`. This prevents any 
>> further logic to execute if `action` is null.
>> 
>> New test methods have been added to the existing test class 
>> `test/jdk/java/util/Collections/DelegatingIteratorForEachRemaining.java`. 
>> This test class was introduced in 
>> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8205184 where this delegation logic was 
>> added for the `forEachRemaining` methods. These new test methods reproduce 
>> the failure and verify the fix.
>
> Jaikiran Pai has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
> commit since the last revision:
> 
>   review suggestion - simplify test

tier1, tier2, tier3 and java_util tests in JCK have passed with this change.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/11154

Reply via email to