On Wed, 30 Nov 2022 15:30:40 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore <mcimadam...@openjdk.org> 
wrote:

>> This PR contains the API and implementation changes for JEP-434 [1]. A more 
>> detailed description of such changes, to avoid repetitions during the review 
>> process, is included as a separate comment.
>> 
>> [1] - https://openjdk.org/jeps/434
>
> Maurizio Cimadamore has updated the pull request with a new target base due 
> to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes 
> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 67 additional 
> commits since the last revision:
> 
>  - Merge branch 'master' into PR_20
>  - Address review comment
>  - Polish javadoc:
>    * Make sure that first para of class javadoc is succinct and descriptive
>    * Remove references to "access" var handle or "memory segment view" var 
> handle (just use var handle)
>    * Minor tweak to layout classes javadoc - use `@see` in value layouts 
> instead of a dedicated para.
>    * Other minor typos fixes
>  - Address review comments
>  - * remove unused Scoped interface
>    * re-add trusting of final fields in layout class implementations
>    * Fix BulkOps benchmark, which had alignment issues
>  - Fix bit vs. byte mismatch in test
>  - Fix wrong check in MemorySegment::spliterator/elements
>    (The check which ensures that the segment size is multiple of spliterator 
> element size is bogus)
>  - Address more review comments
>  - Fix bad @throws in MemorySegment::copy methods
>  - Address review comments
>  - ... and 57 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/4c9f206a...8668fb39

src/java.base/share/classes/java/nio/channels/FileChannel.java line 1004:

> 1002:      * Maps a region of this channel's file into a new mapped memory 
> segment, with the given offset,
> 1003:      * size and memory session. The {@linkplain MemorySegment#address() 
> address} of the returned memory segment
> 1004:      * is the starting address of the mapped off-heap region backing 
> the segment.

Would you mind reflowing this paragraph to that the line lengths are a bit more 
consistent with the paragraphs that follow? That would also help with 
side-by-side views when looking at changes.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10872

Reply via email to