core-libs-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [jdk27] RFR: 8388183: Wrong example in documentation for String.toLowerCase() Iris Clark
  • Re: [jdk27] RFR: 8388183: Wrong example in documentation for String.toLowerCase() Justin Lu
  • Re: [jdk27] RFR: 8388183: Wrong example in documentation for String.toLowerCase() Naoto Sato
  • [jdk27] Integrated: 8388183: Wrong example in documentation for String.toLowerCase() Naoto Sato
• RFR: 8388427: Fix javadoc typos related to {@code} and {@linkplain} Andrei Rybak
  • Re: RFR: 8388427: Fix javadoc typos related to {@code} and {@linkplain} Andrei Rybak
  • Re: RFR: 8388427: Fix javadoc typos related to {@code} and {@linkplain} Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8388427: Fix javadoc typos related to {@code} and {@linkplain} Andrei Rybak
  • Re: RFR: 8388427: Fix javadoc typos related to {@code} and {@linkplain} Phil Race
  • Re: RFR: 8388427: Fix javadoc typos related to {@code} and {@linkplain} Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8388427: Fix javadoc typos related to {@code} and {@linkplain} [v2] Andrei Rybak
  • Re: RFR: 8388427: Fix javadoc typos related to {@code} and {@linkplain} [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8388427: Fix javadoc typos related to {@code} and {@linkplain} [v2] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8388427: Fix javadoc typos related to {@code} and {@linkplain} [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8388427: Fix javadoc typos related to {@code} and {@linkplain} [v2] duke
  • Integrated: 8388427: Fix javadoc typos related to {@code} and {@linkplain} Andrei Rybak
• Re: RFR: 8374364: TestCgroupMetrics.java fails when cpuset unmounted [v14] sendaoYan
• RFR: 8133167: String.toLowerCase() for sigma does not use Final_Sigma condition Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8133167: String.toLowerCase() for sigma does not use Final_Sigma condition Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8133167: String.toLowerCase() for sigma does not use Final_Sigma condition [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8133167: String.toLowerCase() for sigma does not use Final_Sigma condition [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8133167: String.toLowerCase() for sigma does not use Final_Sigma condition [v3] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8133167: String.toLowerCase() for sigma does not use Final_Sigma condition [v3] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8133167: String.toLowerCase() for sigma does not use Final_Sigma condition [v3] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8133167: String.toLowerCase() for sigma does not use Final_Sigma condition [v3] Bernd
  • Re: RFR: 8133167: String.toLowerCase() for sigma does not use Final_Sigma condition [v3] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8133167: String.toLowerCase() for sigma does not use Final_Sigma condition [v4] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8133167: String.toLowerCase() for sigma does not use Final_Sigma condition [v4] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8133167: String.toLowerCase() for sigma does not use Final_Sigma condition [v5] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8133167: String.toLowerCase() for sigma does not use Final_Sigma condition [v6] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8133167: String.toLowerCase() for sigma does not use Final_Sigma condition [v6] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8133167: String.toLowerCase() for sigma does not use Final_Sigma condition [v6] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8133167: String.toLowerCase() for sigma does not use Final_Sigma condition [v7] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8133167: String.toLowerCase() for sigma does not use Final_Sigma condition [v7] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8133167: String.toLowerCase() for sigma does not use Final_Sigma condition [v7] Naoto Sato
  • Integrated: 8133167: String.toLowerCase() for sigma does not use Final_Sigma condition Naoto Sato
• Re: RFR: 8372153: AArch64: Performance regression in long reduction microbenchmarks after JDK-8340093 Fei Gao
  • Re: RFR: 8372153: AArch64: Performance regression in long reduction microbenchmarks after JDK-8340093 Fei Gao
• RFR: 8387723: Scoped memory async exceptions can be delivered inside FJP compensation code Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8387723: Scoped memory async exceptions can be delivered inside FJP compensation code Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8387723: Scoped memory async exceptions can be delivered inside FJP compensation code Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8387723: Scoped memory async exceptions can be delivered inside FJP compensation code Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8387723: Scoped memory async exceptions can be delivered inside FJP compensation code Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8387723: Scoped memory async exceptions can be delivered inside FJP compensation code Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8387723: Scoped memory async exceptions can be delivered inside FJP compensation code Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8387723: Scoped memory async exceptions can be delivered inside FJP compensation code Jorn Vernee
• Re: RFR: 8383625: Throw exceptions unconditionally for some unmodifiable reversed collections views [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8383625: Throw exceptions unconditionally for some unmodifiable reversed collections views [v2] Stuart Marks
• Withdrawn: 8383625: Throw exceptions unconditionally for some unmodifiable reversed collections views duke
• Re: RFR: 8381560: AArch64: Optimize String.equals intrinsic [v3] Ehsan Behrangi
  • Re: RFR: 8381560: AArch64: Optimize String.equals intrinsic [v3] Mikhail Ablakatov
  • Re: RFR: 8381560: AArch64: Optimize String.equals intrinsic [v3] Mikhail Ablakatov
  • Re: RFR: 8381560: AArch64: Optimize String.equals intrinsic [v3] Ehsan Behrangi
• Withdrawn: 8385118: Writer.append(CharSequence) optimization duke
• RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator Robert Scholte
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v2] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v2] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v2] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v2] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v2] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v2] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v3] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v3] Brent Christian
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v3] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v3] Brent Christian
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v3] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v3] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v4] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v5] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v5] Brent Christian
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v5] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v6] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v6] Brent Christian
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v6] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v7] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v7] Brent Christian
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v7] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v7] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v7] duke
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v7] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v7] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v7] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v7] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v7] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v7] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v7] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v7] Guanqiang Han
  • Integrated: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator Guanqiang Han
• RFR: 8388374: Class-File API does not enforce required validation for null matches and empty PackageEntry names Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8388374: Class-File API does not enforce required validation for null matches and empty PackageEntry names Adam Sotona
  • Re: RFR: 8388374: Class-File API does not enforce required validation for null matches and empty PackageEntry names Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8388374: Class-File API does not enforce required validation for null matches and empty PackageEntry names [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8388374: Class-File API does not enforce required validation for null matches and empty PackageEntry names [v2] Adam Sotona
  • Re: RFR: 8388374: Class-File API does not enforce required validation for null matches and empty PackageEntry names [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8388374: Class-File API does not enforce required validation for null matches and empty PackageEntry names [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8388374: Class-File API does not enforce required validation for null matches and empty PackageEntry names [v3] Adam Sotona
  • Re: RFR: 8388374: Class-File API does not enforce required validation for null matches and empty PackageEntry names [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8388374: Class-File API does not enforce required validation for null matches and empty PackageEntry names [v3] Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8388374: Class-File API does not enforce required validation for null matches and empty PackageEntry names [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8388374: Class-File API does not enforce required validation for null matches and empty PackageEntry names [v4] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8388374: Class-File API does not enforce required validation for null matches and empty PackageEntry names [v4] Adam Sotona
  • Re: RFR: 8388374: Class-File API does not enforce required validation for null matches and empty PackageEntry names [v4] Chen Liang
  • Integrated: 8388374: Class-File API does not enforce required validation for null matches and empty PackageEntry names Chen Liang
• Identifying JDK value class candidates Dan Smith
  • [External] : Re: Identifying JDK value class candidates David Alayachew
  • Re: Identifying JDK value class candidates Dan Smith
  • [External] : Re: Identifying JDK value class candidates David Alayachew
  • Re: Identifying JDK value class candidates Dan Smith
  • Re: Identifying JDK value class candidates Sean Mullan
• RFR: 8388362: Class-File API MethodHandleEntry symbolic accessors do not throw IllegalArgumentException for invalid REF_newInvokeSpecial data Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8388362: Class-File API MethodHandleEntry symbolic accessors do not throw IllegalArgumentException for invalid REF_newInvokeSpecial data Adam Sotona
  • Re: RFR: 8388362: Class-File API MethodHandleEntry symbolic accessors do not throw IllegalArgumentException for invalid REF_newInvokeSpecial data [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8388362: Class-File API MethodHandleEntry symbolic accessors do not throw IllegalArgumentException for invalid REF_newInvokeSpecial data [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8388362: Class-File API MethodHandleEntry symbolic accessors do not throw IllegalArgumentException for invalid REF_newInvokeSpecial data [v3] Chen Liang
  • Integrated: 8388362: Class-File API MethodHandleEntry symbolic accessors do not throw IllegalArgumentException for invalid REF_newInvokeSpecial data Chen Liang
• RFR: 8388347: Remove enablePreview from TestEnableNativeAccessJarManifest Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8388347: Remove enablePreview from TestEnableNativeAccessJarManifest Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8388347: Remove enablePreview from TestEnableNativeAccessJarManifest Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8388347: Remove enablePreview from TestEnableNativeAccessJarManifest Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8388347: Remove enablePreview from TestEnableNativeAccessJarManifest Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8388347: Remove enablePreview from TestEnableNativeAccessJarManifest Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8388347: Remove enablePreview from TestEnableNativeAccessJarManifest Chen Liang
  • Integrated: 8388347: Remove enablePreview from TestEnableNativeAccessJarManifest Chen Liang
• Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v105] Doug Lea
• RFR: 8387753: Improve SimpleDateFormat.set2DigitYearStart() documentation Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8387753: Improve SimpleDateFormat.set2DigitYearStart() documentation Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8387753: Improve SimpleDateFormat.set2DigitYearStart() documentation Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8387753: Improve SimpleDateFormat.set2DigitYearStart() documentation [v2] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8387753: Improve SimpleDateFormat.set2DigitYearStart() documentation [v2] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8387753: Improve SimpleDateFormat.set2DigitYearStart() documentation [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8387753: Improve SimpleDateFormat.set2DigitYearStart() documentation [v2] Volkan Yazici
  • Integrated: 8387753: Improve SimpleDateFormat.set2DigitYearStart() documentation Volkan Yazici
• Re: RFR: 8384571: C2: Add some basic IGVN optimization for VectorBlendNode [v2] Eric Fang
  • Re: RFR: 8384571: C2: Add some basic IGVN optimization for VectorBlendNode [v2] Eric Fang
• RFR: 8387745: [aot] Several tests fail because a SoftReferenceKey cannot be archived Ashutosh Mehra
  • Re: RFR: 8387745: [aot] Several tests fail because a SoftReferenceKey cannot be archived Ashutosh Mehra
  • Re: RFR: 8387745: [aot] Several tests fail because a SoftReferenceKey cannot be archived Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8387745: [aot] Several tests fail because a SoftReferenceKey cannot be archived Vladimir Kozlov
  • Integrated: 8387745: [aot] Several tests fail because a SoftReferenceKey cannot be archived Ashutosh Mehra
• Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v104] Doug Lea
• RFR: 8388183: Wrong example in documentation for String.toLowerCase() Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8388183: Wrong example in documentation for String.toLowerCase() Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8388183: Wrong example in documentation for String.toLowerCase() Iris Clark
  • Re: RFR: 8388183: Wrong example in documentation for String.toLowerCase() Naoto Sato
  • Integrated: 8388183: Wrong example in documentation for String.toLowerCase() Naoto Sato
• RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v2] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v2] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v2] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v2] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v2] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v2] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v3] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v3] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v3] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v3] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v3] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v3] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v3] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v4] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v5] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v5] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v5] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v5] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v6] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v6] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v6] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v6] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v6] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v7] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v7] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v7] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v7] duke
  • Integrated: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error Guanqiang Han
• RFR: 8387949: Implementation of PEM Encodings of Cryptographic Objects Anthony Scarpino
  • Re: RFR: 8387949: Implementation of PEM Encodings of Cryptographic Objects Sean Mullan

• Earlier messages
• Later messages