On Mon, 6 Feb 2023 09:03:48 GMT, Quan Anh Mai <qa...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> @ExE-Boss I think that immediately following `isNaN` checks give enough hint >> that we want NaN to be here. > > Ah I see, a comment explaining the intention would be helpful here, then Ok, added some explanatory comments. Hopefully they clarify the intention. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12428
