On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 11:07:08 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore <[email protected]>
wrote:
>> `TypeParam` is not a signature, because it simply is not a signature.
>> Per spec:
>>
>> TypeParameter:
>> Identifier ClassBound {InterfaceBound}
>
>> `Signature.ThrowableSig` is a `Signature` and it is a common super of
>> `ClassTypeSig` and `TypeVarSig`.
>
> I really don't follow here. ThrowableSig is a piece of a method signature,
> which starts with "^" and is followed by either a class or a typevar
> signature. You can never encounter it from the toplevel JavaTypeSignature
> production. It's ok (as I have said) to have a ThrowableSig element in the
> API to model the production, but that element should not be a subtype of
> Signature (at least not if Signature, as you claimed is meant to model the
> JavaTypeSignature production). That is, there's no "is a" relationship
> between JavaTypeSignature and ThrowableSig (at least not that I can see when
> looking at the productions).
OK, I see your point now, I'll fix it.
Thanks
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10982
