On Fri, 10 Feb 2023 07:25:11 GMT, Alan Bateman <al...@openjdk.org> wrote:

> Looks okay, I assume you've done a wider search to see if there are any more.

I missed the ones that @djelinski spotted. I rescanned `java.io` and don't see 
any others. Those two are fixed by 7868641a2c9558e66b51c40b49031095317c3a48.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12505

Reply via email to