On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 15:03:50 GMT, Scott Gibbons <sgibb...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> src/hotspot/cpu/x86/stubGenerator_x86_64.cpp line 2699: >> >>> 2697: __ addptr(dest, 0x18); >>> 2698: __ subl(length, 0x20); >>> 2699: __ jcc(Assembler::lessEqual, L_tailProc); >> >> This could be Assembler::less instead of Assembler::lessEqual. > > Why? There is no performance difference and the intent is clear. Is this > just a "style" thing? I think with `lessEqual` we'll jump to `L_tailProc` for the final 32-byte chunk in inputs that are divisible by 32 (starting from 64), no? Using `less` avoids that, while not affecting performance of any other inputs. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12126
