core-libs-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: RFR: 8392046: R30 and R31 should not be SOC on Windows [v3] Srinivas Vamsi Parasa
  • Integrated: 8392046: R30 and R31 should not be SOC on Windows Srinivas Vamsi Parasa
• RFR: 8392996: Timezone name formatting repeatedly looks up missing CLDR dstOffset data Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8392996: Timezone name formatting repeatedly looks up missing CLDR dstOffset data Min Choi
  • Re: RFR: 8392996: Timezone name formatting repeatedly looks up missing CLDR dstOffset data [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8392996: Timezone name formatting repeatedly looks up missing CLDR dstOffset data [v2] Min Choi
  • Re: RFR: 8392996: Timezone name formatting repeatedly looks up missing CLDR dstOffset data [v2] Min Choi
  • Re: RFR: 8392996: Timezone name formatting repeatedly looks up missing CLDR dstOffset data [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8392996: Timezone name formatting repeatedly looks up missing CLDR dstOffset data [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8392996: Timezone name formatting repeatedly looks up missing CLDR dstOffset data [v3] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8392996: Timezone name formatting repeatedly looks up missing CLDR dstOffset data [v3] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8392996: Timezone name formatting repeatedly looks up missing CLDR dstOffset data [v3] Min Choi
  • Re: RFR: 8392996: Timezone name formatting repeatedly looks up missing CLDR dstOffset data [v3] Thomas Zimmermann
  • Re: RFR: 8392996: Timezone name formatting repeatedly looks up missing CLDR dstOffset data [v3] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8392996: Timezone name formatting repeatedly looks up missing CLDR dstOffset data [v3] Thomas Zimmermann
  • Re: RFR: 8392996: Timezone name formatting repeatedly looks up missing CLDR dstOffset data [v3] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8392996: Timezone name formatting repeatedly looks up missing CLDR dstOffset data [v3] Naoto Sato
  • Integrated: 8392996: Timezone name formatting repeatedly looks up missing CLDR dstOffset data Naoto Sato
• RFR: 8393318: VarHandle CAE case should be handled as in JDK-8391651 Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8393318: VarHandle CAE case should be handled as in JDK-8391651 Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8393318: VarHandle CAE case should be handled as in JDK-8391651 Johan Sjölen
  • Re: RFR: 8393318: VarHandle CAE case should be handled as in JDK-8391651 David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8393318: VarHandle CAE case should be handled as in JDK-8391651 [v2] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8393318: VarHandle CAE case should be handled as in JDK-8391651 [v2] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8393318: VarHandle CAE case should be handled as in JDK-8391651 [v2] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8393318: VarHandle CAE case should be handled as in JDK-8391651 [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8393318: VarHandle CAE case should be handled as in JDK-8391651 [v2] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8393318: VarHandle CAE case should be handled as in JDK-8391651 [v2] Johan Sjölen
  • Re: RFR: 8393318: VarHandle CAE case should be handled as in JDK-8391651 [v2] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Integrated: 8393318: VarHandle CAE case should be handled as in JDK-8391651 Aleksey Shipilev
• [External] : Stable, Cache-aware, Faster sorting algorithm. shreyas patil
• Withdrawn: 8384062: Add a new method List::removeAt to avoid overload confusion duke
• Re: RFR: 8322292: Rearrange comparison of fields in Record.equals() [v7] Sergey Tsypanov
• RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v2] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v2] Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v2] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v3] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v3] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v3] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v3] Jasmine Karthikeyan
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v4] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v4] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v4] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v4] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v4] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v4] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v4] Sandhya Viswanathan
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v4] Sandhya Viswanathan
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v5] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v5] Sandhya Viswanathan
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v5] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v5] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v6] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v6] Sandhya Viswanathan
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v6] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v6] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v6] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v6] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v8] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v8] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v8] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v8] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v7] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v7] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v7] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v10] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v10] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v10] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v11] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v11] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v11] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v11] Sandhya Viswanathan
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v9] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v9] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v9] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v12] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v12] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v12] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v12] Sandhya Viswanathan
  • Re: RFR: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction [v12] Jatin Bhateja
  • Integrated: 8393068: Optimize uniform vector byte shift operations using x86 GFNI instruction Jatin Bhateja
• Re: RFR: 8380361: Display -XshowSettings configuration data via jcmd [v14] Kieran Farrell
  • Re: RFR: 8380361: Display -XshowSettings configuration data via jcmd [v14] Sean Coffey
  • Re: RFR: 8380361: Display -XshowSettings configuration data via jcmd [v14] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8380361: Display -XshowSettings configuration data via jcmd [v14] Sean Coffey
• Re: RFR: 8380361: Display -XshowSettings configuration data via jcmd [v12] Kieran Farrell
• Re: RFR: 8380361: Display -XshowSettings configuration data via jcmd [v13] Kieran Farrell
• Re: RFR: 8389573: InputStreamReader.readAllAsString() should override the generic Reader default implementation to avoid unnecessary buffer copies [v8] Markus KARG
  • Re: RFR: 8389573: InputStreamReader.readAllAsString() should override the generic Reader default implementation to avoid unnecessary buffer copies [v8] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8389573: InputStreamReader.readAllAsString() should override the generic Reader default implementation to avoid unnecessary buffer copies [v8] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8389573: InputStreamReader.readAllAsString() should override the generic Reader default implementation to avoid unnecessary buffer copies [v8] Markus KARG
  • Re: RFR: 8389573: InputStreamReader.readAllAsString() should override the generic Reader default implementation to avoid unnecessary buffer copies [v8] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8389573: InputStreamReader.readAllAsString() should override the generic Reader default implementation to avoid unnecessary buffer copies [v8] Jaikiran Pai
• Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v131] Doug Lea
• [External] : HttpClient: no way to control name resolution per client Rafael Winterhalter
  • Re: [External] : HttpClient: no way to control name resolution per client Alan Bateman
• RFR: 8393048: HijrahDate.withVariant fails when the target Hijrah variant has a shorter month sbracely
  • Re: RFR: 8393048: HijrahDate.withVariant fails when the target Hijrah variant has a shorter month [v2] sbracely
  • Re: RFR: 8393048: HijrahDate.withVariant fails when the target Hijrah variant has a shorter month [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8393048: HijrahDate.withVariant fails when the target Hijrah variant has a shorter month [v2] sbracely
  • Re: RFR: 8393048: HijrahDate.withVariant fails when the target Hijrah variant has a shorter month [v2] sbracely
  • Re: RFR: 8393048: HijrahDate.withVariant fails when the target Hijrah variant has a shorter month [v2] sbracely
  • Re: RFR: 8393048: HijrahDate.withVariant fails when the target Hijrah variant has a shorter month [v3] sbracely
  • Re: RFR: 8393048: HijrahDate.withVariant fails when the target Hijrah variant has a shorter month [v3] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8393048: HijrahDate.withVariant fails when the target Hijrah variant has a shorter month [v3] duke
  • Integrated: 8393048: HijrahDate.withVariant fails when the target Hijrah variant has a shorter month sbracely
• RFR: 8392994: DateTimeFormatter prints specific zone names for offset-only values Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8392994: DateTimeFormatter prints specific zone names for offset-only values Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8392994: DateTimeFormatter prints specific zone names for offset-only values Naoto Sato
  • Integrated: 8392994: DateTimeFormatter prints specific zone names for offset-only values Naoto Sato
• RFR: 8392995: CLDR metazone offset overrides custom DateFormatSymbols and TimeZone behavior Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8392995: CLDR metazone offset overrides custom DateFormatSymbols and TimeZone behavior Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8392995: CLDR metazone offset overrides custom DateFormatSymbols and TimeZone behavior [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8392995: CLDR metazone offset overrides custom DateFormatSymbols and TimeZone behavior [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8392995: CLDR metazone offset overrides custom DateFormatSymbols and TimeZone behavior [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8392995: CLDR metazone offset overrides custom DateFormatSymbols and TimeZone behavior [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8392995: CLDR metazone offset overrides custom DateFormatSymbols and TimeZone behavior [v2] Min Choi
  • Re: RFR: 8392995: CLDR metazone offset overrides custom DateFormatSymbols and TimeZone behavior [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Integrated: 8392995: CLDR metazone offset overrides custom DateFormatSymbols and TimeZone behavior Justin Lu
• Re: RFR: 8380361: Display -XshowSettings configuration data via jcmd [v11] Kieran Farrell
• Re: RFR: 8380361: Display -XshowSettings configuration data via jcmd [v10] Kieran Farrell
• RFR: 8388161: value-objects-jls: 12.6: address finalization of value objects Dan Smith
  • Re: RFR: 8388161: value-objects-jls: 12.6: address finalization of value objects Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8388161: value-objects-jls: 12.6: address finalization of value objects Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8388161: value-objects-jls: 12.6: address finalization of value objects Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8388161: value-objects-jls: 12.6: address finalization of value objects Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8388161: value-objects-jls: 12.6: address finalization of value objects Dan Smith
  • Re: RFR: 8388161: value-objects-jls: 12.6: address finalization of value objects [v2] Dan Smith
  • Re: RFR: 8388161: value-objects-jls: 12.6: address finalization of value objects [v3] Dan Smith
  • Re: RFR: 8388161: value-objects-jls: 12.6: address finalization of value objects [v3] Vicente Romero
  • Re: RFR: 8388161: value-objects-jls: 12.6: address finalization of value objects [v3] Dan Smith
  • Integrated: 8388161: value-objects-jls: 12.6: address finalization of value objects Dan Smith
• RFR: 8392957: (tz) Clean up the Windows TimeZone_md.c Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8392957: (tz) Clean up the Windows TimeZone_md.c Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8392957: (tz) Clean up the Windows TimeZone_md.c Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8392957: (tz) Clean up the Windows TimeZone_md.c Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8392957: (tz) Clean up the Windows TimeZone_md.c Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8392957: (tz) Clean up the Windows TimeZone_md.c Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8392957: (tz) Clean up the Windows TimeZone_md.c [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8392957: (tz) Clean up the Windows TimeZone_md.c [v2] Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8392957: (tz) Clean up the Windows TimeZone_md.c [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8392957: (tz) Clean up the Windows TimeZone_md.c [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8392957: (tz) Clean up the Windows TimeZone_md.c [v2] Daniel Jeliński
  • Integrated: 8392957: (tz) Clean up the Windows TimeZone_md.c Daniel Jeliński
• RFR: 8392966: Improve error message for executable JAR file Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8392966: Improve error message for executable JAR file Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8392966: Improve error message for executable JAR file Christian Stein
  • Re: RFR: 8392966: Improve the error message from "java -jar" for JAR files without a manifest [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8392966: Improve the error message from "java -jar" for JAR files without a manifest [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8392966: Improve the error message from "java -jar" for JAR files without a manifest [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8392966: Improve the error message from "java -jar" for JAR files without a manifest [v3] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8392966: Improve the error message from "java -jar" for JAR files without a manifest [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8392966: Improve the error message from "java -jar" for JAR files without a manifest [v3] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8392966: Improve the error message from "java -jar" for JAR files without a manifest [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8392966: Improve the error message from "java -jar" for JAR files without a manifest [v3] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8392966: Improve the error message from "java -jar" for JAR files without a manifest [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8392966: Improve the error message from "java -jar" for JAR files without a manifest [v4] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8392966: Improve the error message from "java -jar" for JAR files without a manifest [v4] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8392966: Improve the error message from "java -jar" for JAR files without a manifest [v4] Christian Stein
  • Re: RFR: 8392966: Improve the error message from "java -jar" for JAR files without a manifest [v4] Jaikiran Pai
  • Integrated: 8392966: Improve the error message from "java -jar" for JAR files without a manifest Jaikiran Pai
• RFR: 8392914: Several jdk/internal/vm/Continuation/BasicExt.java test cases fail with -XX:CompileThresholdScaling=0.01 Richard Reingruber
  • Re: RFR: 8392914: Several jdk/internal/vm/Continuation/BasicExt.java test cases fail with -XX:CompileThresholdScaling=0.01 Martin Doerr
  • Re: RFR: 8392914: Several jdk/internal/vm/Continuation/BasicExt.java test cases fail with -XX:CompileThresholdScaling=0.01 David Briemann
  • Integrated: 8392914: Several jdk/internal/vm/Continuation/BasicExt.java test cases fail with -XX:CompileThresholdScaling=0.01 Richard Reingruber
  • Re: RFR: 8392914: Several jdk/internal/vm/Continuation/BasicExt.java test cases fail with -XX:CompileThresholdScaling=0.01 Richard Reingruber
• Re: RFR: 8383244: Shared scope closure should only deoptimize if the scope oop is live [v8] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8383244: Shared scope closure should only deoptimize if the scope oop is live [v8] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8383244: Shared scope closure should only deoptimize if the scope oop is live [v8] Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8383244: Shared scope closure should only deoptimize if the scope oop is live [v8] Jorn Vernee
• Integrated: 8385513: AArch64: Improve ArraysSupport.vectorizedHashCode performance for large arrays Ehsan Behrangi
• Integrated: 8381560: AArch64: Optimize String.equals intrinsic Ehsan Behrangi
• RFR: 8392465: [Vector API] VectorOperators.Operator::compatibleWith gives incorrect results for COMPRESS_BITS and EXPAND_BITS Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8392465: [Vector API] VectorOperators.Operator::compatibleWith gives incorrect results for COMPRESS_BITS and EXPAND_BITS Paul Sandoz
  • Re: RFR: 8392465: [Vector API] VectorOperators.Operator::compatibleWith gives incorrect results for COMPRESS_BITS and EXPAND_BITS [v2] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8392465: [Vector API] VectorOperators.Operator::compatibleWith gives incorrect results for COMPRESS_BITS and EXPAND_BITS [v2] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8392465: [Vector API] VectorOperators.Operator::compatibleWith gives incorrect results for COMPRESS_BITS and EXPAND_BITS [v2] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8392465: [Vector API] VectorOperators.Operator::compatibleWith gives incorrect results for COMPRESS_BITS and EXPAND_BITS [v2] Paul Sandoz
  • Re: RFR: 8392465: [Vector API] VectorOperators.Operator::compatibleWith gives incorrect results for COMPRESS_BITS and EXPAND_BITS [v2] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8392465: [Vector API] VectorOperators.Operator::compatibleWith gives incorrect results for COMPRESS_BITS and EXPAND_BITS [v2] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8392465: [Vector API] VectorOperators.Operator::compatibleWith gives incorrect results for COMPRESS_BITS and EXPAND_BITS [v2] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8392465: [Vector API] Extend scope of COMPRESS_BITS and EXPAND_BITS operators to sub-word types [v2] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8392465: [Vector API] VectorOperators.Operator::compatibleWith gives incorrect results for COMPRESS_BITS and EXPAND_BITS Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8392465: [Vector API] VectorOperators.Operator::compatibleWith gives incorrect results for COMPRESS_BITS and EXPAND_BITS [v3] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8392465: [Vector API] VectorOperators.Operator::compatibleWith gives incorrect results for COMPRESS_BITS and EXPAND_BITS [v3] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: RFR: 8392465: [Vector API] VectorOperators.Operator::compatibleWith gives incorrect results for COMPRESS_BITS and EXPAND_BITS [v3] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8392465: [Vector API] VectorOperators.Operator::compatibleWith gives incorrect results for COMPRESS_BITS and EXPAND_BITS [v4] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8392465: [Vector API] VectorOperators.Operator::compatibleWith gives incorrect results for COMPRESS_BITS and EXPAND_BITS [v4] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: RFR: 8392465: [Vector API] VectorOperators.Operator::compatibleWith gives incorrect results for COMPRESS_BITS and EXPAND_BITS [v4] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8392465: [Vector API] VectorOperators.Operator::compatibleWith gives incorrect results for COMPRESS_BITS and EXPAND_BITS [v4] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8392465: [Vector API] VectorOperators.Operator::compatibleWith gives incorrect results for COMPRESS_BITS and EXPAND_BITS [v4] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8392465: [Vector API] VectorOperators.Operator::compatibleWith gives incorrect results for COMPRESS_BITS and EXPAND_BITS [v4] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8392465: [Vector API] Extend scope of COMPRESS_BITS and EXPAND_BITS operators to sub-word types [v5] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8392465: [Vector API] Extend scope of COMPRESS_BITS and EXPAND_BITS operators to sub-word types [v5] Paul Sandoz
• Re: RFR: 8352794: PoolEntry and BootstrapMethodEntry hashCode inconsistent with equals [v3] Daisuke Yamazaki
• Integrated: 8387748: VectorAPI: AArch64: Improve VectorMask.lastTrue() SVE implementation Eric Fang
• [External] : Getting hold of the user provided system properties Rafael Winterhalter
• Withdrawn: 8388887: Migrate AtomicReferenceFieldUpdater to use VarHandle duke
• Re: RFR: 8372153: AArch64: Performance regression in long reduction microbenchmarks after JDK-8340093 [v9] Fei Gao

• Earlier messages
• Later messages