core-libs-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: RFR: 8376665: Port fdlibm acosh to Java [v9] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8376665: Port fdlibm acosh to Java [v9] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8376665: Port fdlibm acosh to Java [v9] Anton Artemov
  • Integrated: 8376665: Port fdlibm acosh to Java Anton Artemov
• RFR: 8376760: VerifyJimage.java#compare intermittent timed out with fastdebug SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8376760: VerifyJimage.java#compare intermittent timed out with fastdebug Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8376760: VerifyJimage.java#compare intermittent timed out with fastdebug SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8376760: VerifyJimage.java#compare intermittent failed with fastdebug Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8376760: VerifyJimage.java#compare intermittent failed with fastdebug [v2] SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8376760: VerifyJimage.java#compare intermittent failed with fastdebug [v2] SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8376760: VerifyJimage.java#compare intermittent failed with fastdebug [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8376760: VerifyJimage.java#compare intermittent failed with fastdebug [v2] SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8376760: VerifyJimage.java#compare intermittent failed with fastdebug [v3] SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8376760: VerifyJimage.java#compare intermittent failed with fastdebug [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8376760: VerifyJimage.java#compare intermittent failed with fastdebug [v3] David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8376760: VerifyJimage.java#compare intermittent failed with fastdebug [v3] SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8376760: VerifyJimage.java#compare intermittent failed with fastdebug [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8376760: VerifyJimage.java#compare intermittent failed with fastdebug [v3] SendaoYan
  • Integrated: 8376760: VerifyJimage.java#compare intermittent failed with fastdebug SendaoYan
• RFR: 8340830: Console.readLine() and Console.printf() are mutually blocking Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8340830: Console.readLine() and Console.printf() are mutually blocking Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8340830: Console.readLine() and Console.printf() are mutually blocking Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8340830: Console.readLine() and Console.printf() are mutually blocking [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8340830: Console.readLine() and Console.printf() are mutually blocking [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8340830: Console.readLine() and Console.printf() are mutually blocking [v3] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8340830: Console.readLine() and Console.printf() are mutually blocking [v3] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8340830: Console.readLine() and Console.printf() are mutually blocking [v3] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8340830: Console.readLine() and Console.printf() are mutually blocking [v4] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8340830: Console.readLine() and Console.printf() are mutually blocking [v4] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8340830: Console.readLine() and Console.printf() are mutually blocking [v4] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8340830: Console.readLine() and Console.printf() are mutually blocking [v4] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8340830: Console.readLine() and Console.printf() are mutually blocking [v5] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8340830: Console.readLine() and Console.printf() are mutually blocking [v5] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8340830: Console.readLine() and Console.printf() are mutually blocking [v5] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8340830: Console.readLine() and Console.printf() are mutually blocking [v5] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8340830: Console.readLine() and Console.printf() are mutually blocking [v5] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8340830: Console.readLine() and Console.printf() are mutually blocking [v5] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8340830: Console.readLine() and Console.printf() are mutually blocking [v5] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8340830: Console.readLine() and Console.printf() are mutually blocking [v5] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8340830: Console.readLine() and Console.printf() are mutually blocking [v5] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8340830: Console.readLine() and Console.printf() are mutually blocking [v5] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8340830: Console.readLine() and Console.printf() are mutually blocking [v6] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8340830: Console.readLine() and Console.printf() are mutually blocking [v6] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8340830: Console.readLine() and Console.printf() are mutually blocking [v6] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8340830: Console.readLine() and Console.printf() are mutually blocking [v6] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8340830: Console.readLine() and Console.printf() are mutually blocking [v6] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8340830: Console.readLine() and Console.printf() are mutually blocking [v7] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8340830: Console.readLine() and Console.printf() are mutually blocking [v8] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8340830: Console.readLine() and Console.printf() are mutually blocking [v8] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8340830: Console.readLine() and Console.printf() are mutually blocking [v8] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8340830: Console.readLine() and Console.printf() are mutually blocking [v8] Naoto Sato
  • Integrated: 8340830: Console.readLine() and Console.printf() are mutually blocking Naoto Sato
• Re: RFR: 8266431: Dual-Pivot Quicksort improvements (Radix sort) [v6] Vladimir Yaroslavskiy
  • Re: RFR: 8266431: Dual-Pivot Quicksort improvements (Radix sort) [v6] Vladimir Yaroslavskiy
  • Re: RFR: 8266431: Dual-Pivot Quicksort improvements (Radix sort) [v6] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8266431: Dual-Pivot Quicksort improvements (Radix sort) [v6] Vladimir Yaroslavskiy
• RFR: 8376698: Add Spliterator tests for TreeMap sub-maps Oli Gillespie
  • Re: RFR: 8376698: Add Spliterator tests for TreeMap sub-maps Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8376698: Add Spliterator tests for TreeMap sub-maps Oli Gillespie
  • Re: RFR: 8376698: Add Spliterator tests for TreeMap sub-maps Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8376698: Add Spliterator tests for TreeMap sub-maps Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8376698: Add Spliterator tests for TreeMap sub-maps Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8376698: Add Spliterator tests for TreeMap sub-maps Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8376698: Add Spliterator tests for TreeMap sub-maps Oli Gillespie
  • Re: RFR: 8376698: Add Spliterator tests for TreeMap sub-maps Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8376698: Add Spliterator tests for TreeMap sub-maps Oli Gillespie
  • Re: RFR: 8376698: Add Spliterator tests for TreeMap sub-maps Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8376698: Add Spliterator tests for TreeMap sub-maps Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8376698: Add Spliterator tests for TreeMap sub-maps [v2] Oli Gillespie
  • Re: RFR: 8376698: Add Spliterator tests for TreeMap sub-maps [v2] Oli Gillespie
  • Re: RFR: 8376698: Add Spliterator tests for TreeMap sub-maps [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8376698: Add Spliterator tests for TreeMap sub-maps [v2] Oli Gillespie
  • Re: RFR: 8376698: Add Spliterator tests for TreeMap sub-maps [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8376698: Add Spliterator tests for TreeMap sub-maps [v2] Oli Gillespie
  • Re: RFR: 8376698: Add Spliterator tests for TreeMap sub-maps [v2] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8376698: Add Spliterator tests for TreeMap sub-maps [v2] duke
  • Re: RFR: 8376698: Add Spliterator tests for TreeMap sub-maps [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8376698: Add Spliterator tests for TreeMap sub-maps [v2] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8376698: Add Spliterator tests for TreeMap sub-maps [v2] Oli Gillespie
  • Integrated: 8376698: Add Spliterator tests for TreeMap sub-maps Oli Gillespie
• Re: RFR: 8364007: Add no-argument codePointCount method to CharSequence and String [v14] Tatsunori Uchino
  • Re: RFR: 8364007: Add no-argument codePointCount method to CharSequence and String [v14] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8364007: Add no-argument codePointCount method to CharSequence and String [v14] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8364007: Add no-argument codePointCount method to CharSequence and String [v14] Tatsunori Uchino
  • Re: RFR: 8364007: Add no-argument codePointCount method to CharSequence and String [v14] Tatsunori Uchino
  • Re: RFR: 8364007: Add no-argument codePointCount method to CharSequence and String [v14] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8364007: Add no-argument codePointCount method to CharSequence and String [v14] Tatsunori Uchino
  • Re: RFR: 8364007: Add no-argument codePointCount method to CharSequence and String [v14] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8364007: Add no-argument codePointCount method to CharSequence and String [v14] Tatsunori Uchino
• Re: RFR: 8170896: TEST_BUG: java/rmi/server/Unreferenced/leaseCheckInterval/LeaseCheckInterval.java failed with unreferenced() not invoked after 20.0 seconds [v7] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8170896: TEST_BUG: java/rmi/server/Unreferenced/leaseCheckInterval/LeaseCheckInterval.java failed with unreferenced() not invoked after 20.0 seconds [v7] Stuart Marks
  • Re: RFR: 8170896: TEST_BUG: java/rmi/server/Unreferenced/leaseCheckInterval/LeaseCheckInterval.java failed with unreferenced() not invoked after 20.0 seconds [v7] Mark Sheppard
• Re: RFR: 8170896: TEST_BUG: java/rmi/server/Unreferenced/leaseCheckInterval/LeaseCheckInterval.java failed with unreferenced() not invoked after 20.0 seconds [v6] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8170896: TEST_BUG: java/rmi/server/Unreferenced/leaseCheckInterval/LeaseCheckInterval.java failed with unreferenced() not invoked after 20.0 seconds [v6] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8170896: TEST_BUG: java/rmi/server/Unreferenced/leaseCheckInterval/LeaseCheckInterval.java failed with unreferenced() not invoked after 20.0 seconds [v6] Stuart Marks
  • Re: RFR: 8170896: TEST_BUG: java/rmi/server/Unreferenced/leaseCheckInterval/LeaseCheckInterval.java failed with unreferenced() not invoked after 20.0 seconds [v6] Jaikiran Pai
• Re: RFR: 8364007: Add no-argument codePointCount method to CharSequence and String [v13] Tatsunori Uchino
• RFR: 8376187: [VectorAPI] Define new lane type constants and pass them to intrinsic entries Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8376187: [VectorAPI] Define new lane type constants and pass them to intrinsic entries Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: RFR: 8376187: [VectorAPI] Define new lane type constants and pass them to intrinsic entries Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8376187: [VectorAPI] Define new lane type constants and pass them to intrinsic entries Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: RFR: 8376187: [VectorAPI] Define new lane type constants and pass them to intrinsic entries [v2] Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: RFR: 8376187: [VectorAPI] Define new lane type constants and pass them to intrinsic entries [v2] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8376187: [VectorAPI] Define new lane type constants and pass them to intrinsic entries [v2] Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: RFR: 8376187: [VectorAPI] Define new lane type constants and pass them to intrinsic entries [v2] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8376187: [VectorAPI] Define new lane type constants and pass them to intrinsic entries [v2] Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: RFR: 8376187: [VectorAPI] Define new lane type constants and pass them to intrinsic entries [v2] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8376187: [VectorAPI] Define new lane type constants and pass them to intrinsic entries [v2] Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: RFR: 8376187: [VectorAPI] Define new lane type constants and pass them to intrinsic entries [v3] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8376187: [VectorAPI] Define new lane type constants and pass them to intrinsic entries [v3] Paul Sandoz
  • Re: RFR: 8376187: [VectorAPI] Define new lane type constants and pass them to intrinsic entries [v3] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8376187: [VectorAPI] Define new lane type constants and pass them to intrinsic entries [v4] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8376187: [VectorAPI] Define new lane type constants and pass them to intrinsic entries [v4] Paul Sandoz
  • Re: RFR: 8376187: [VectorAPI] Define new lane type constants and pass them to intrinsic entries [v4] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8376187: [VectorAPI] Define new lane type constants and pass them to intrinsic entries [v4] Paul Sandoz
  • Re: RFR: 8376187: [VectorAPI] Define new lane type constants and pass them to intrinsic entries [v5] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8376187: [VectorAPI] Define new lane type constants and pass them to intrinsic entries [v5] Paul Sandoz
  • Re: RFR: 8376187: [VectorAPI] Define new lane type constants and pass them to intrinsic entries [v5] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8376187: [VectorAPI] Define new lane type constants and pass them to intrinsic entries [v6] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8376187: [VectorAPI] Define new lane type constants and pass them to intrinsic entries [v6] Paul Sandoz
  • Re: RFR: 8376187: [VectorAPI] Define new lane type constants and pass them to intrinsic entries [v6] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8376187: [VectorAPI] Define new lane type constants and pass them to intrinsic entries [v7] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8376187: [VectorAPI] Define new lane type constants and pass them to intrinsic entries [v7] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8376187: [VectorAPI] Define new lane type constants and pass them to intrinsic entries [v7] Xueming Shen
  • Re: RFR: 8376187: [VectorAPI] Define new lane type constants and pass them to intrinsic entries [v7] Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: RFR: 8376187: [VectorAPI] Define new lane type constants and pass them to intrinsic entries [v7] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8376187: [VectorAPI] Define new lane type constants and pass them to intrinsic entries [v8] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8376187: [VectorAPI] Define new lane type constants and pass them to intrinsic entries [v8] Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: RFR: 8376187: [VectorAPI] Define new lane type constants and pass them to intrinsic entries [v8] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8376187: [VectorAPI] Define new lane type constants and pass them to intrinsic entries [v8] Paul Sandoz
  • Integrated: 8376187: [VectorAPI] Define new lane type constants and pass them to intrinsic entries Jatin Bhateja
• Re: RFR: 8364007: Add no-argument codePointCount method to CharSequence and String [v12] Tatsunori Uchino
• RFR: 8376630: java/lang/ProcessBuilder/PipelineLeaksFD.java intermittent timed out SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8376630: java/lang/ProcessBuilder/PipelineLeaksFD.java intermittent timed out David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8376630: java/lang/ProcessBuilder/PipelineLeaksFD.java intermittent timed out Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8376630: java/lang/ProcessBuilder/PipelineLeaksFD.java intermittent timed out SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8376630: java/lang/ProcessBuilder/PipelineLeaksFD.java intermittent timed out Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8376630: java/lang/ProcessBuilder/PipelineLeaksFD.java intermittent timed out Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8376630: java/lang/ProcessBuilder/PipelineLeaksFD.java intermittent timed out SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8376630: java/lang/ProcessBuilder/PipelineLeaksFD.java intermittent timed out Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8376630: java/lang/ProcessBuilder/PipelineLeaksFD.java intermittent timed out [v2] SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8376630: java/lang/ProcessBuilder/PipelineLeaksFD.java intermittent timed out Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8376630: java/lang/ProcessBuilder/PipelineLeaksFD.java intermittent timed out [v2] SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8376630: java/lang/ProcessBuilder/PipelineLeaksFD.java intermittent timed out [v2] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8376630: java/lang/ProcessBuilder/PipelineLeaksFD.java intermittent timed out [v2] SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8376630: java/lang/ProcessBuilder/PipelineLeaksFD.java intermittent timed out [v3] SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8376630: java/lang/ProcessBuilder/PipelineLeaksFD.java intermittent timed out [v3] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8376630: java/lang/ProcessBuilder/PipelineLeaksFD.java intermittent timed out [v3] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8376630: java/lang/ProcessBuilder/PipelineLeaksFD.java intermittent timed out [v3] SendaoYan
  • Integrated: 8376630: java/lang/ProcessBuilder/PipelineLeaksFD.java intermittent timed out SendaoYan
• Re: RFR: 8364007: Add no-argument codePointCount method to CharSequence and String [v11] Tatsunori Uchino
  • Re: RFR: 8364007: Add no-argument codePointCount method to CharSequence and String [v11] Tatsunori Uchino
  • Re: RFR: 8364007: Add no-argument codePointCount method to CharSequence and String [v11] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8364007: Add no-argument codePointCount method to CharSequence and String [v11] Tatsunori Uchino
  • Re: RFR: 8364007: Add no-argument codePointCount method to CharSequence and String [v11] Tatsunori Uchino
  • Re: RFR: 8364007: Add no-argument codePointCount method to CharSequence and String [v11] Alan Bateman
• Re: RFR: 8364007: Add no-argument codePointCount method to CharSequence and String [v10] Tatsunori Uchino
• Re: RFR: 8364007: Add no-argument codePointCount method to CharSequence and String [v9] Tatsunori Uchino
  • Re: RFR: 8364007: Add no-argument codePointCount method to CharSequence and String [v9] Tatsunori Uchino
• Re: RFR: 8364007: Add no-argument codePointCount method to CharSequence and String [v8] Tatsunori Uchino
• RFR: 8376568: Change Thread::getStackTrace to use handshake op for all cases Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8376568: Change Thread::getStackTrace to use handshake op for all cases Patricio Chilano Mateo
  • Re: RFR: 8376568: Change Thread::getStackTrace to use handshake op for all cases David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8376568: Change Thread::getStackTrace to use handshake op for all cases [v2] Patricio Chilano Mateo
  • Re: RFR: 8376568: Change Thread::getStackTrace to use handshake op for all cases [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8376568: Change Thread::getStackTrace to use handshake op for all cases [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8376568: Change Thread::getStackTrace to use handshake op for all cases David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8376568: Change Thread::getStackTrace to use handshake op for all cases Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8376568: Change Thread::getStackTrace to use handshake op for all cases David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8376568: Change Thread::getStackTrace to use handshake op for all cases Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8376568: Change Thread::getStackTrace to use handshake op for all cases [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8376568: Change Thread::getStackTrace to use handshake op for all cases [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8376568: Change Thread::getStackTrace to use handshake op for all cases Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8376568: Change Thread::getStackTrace to use handshake op for all cases Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8376568: Change Thread::getStackTrace to use handshake op for all cases [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8376568: Change Thread::getStackTrace to use handshake op for all cases [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8376568: Change Thread::getStackTrace to use handshake op for all cases [v3] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8376568: Change Thread::getStackTrace to use handshake op for all cases [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8376568: Change Thread::getStackTrace to use handshake op for all cases [v3] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8376568: Change Thread::getStackTrace to use handshake op for all cases [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8376568: Change Thread::getStackTrace to use handshake op for all cases [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8376568: Change Thread::getStackTrace to use handshake op for all cases [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8376568: Change Thread::getStackTrace to use handshake op for all cases [v4] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8376568: Change Thread::getStackTrace to use handshake op for all cases [v4] Patricio Chilano Mateo
  • Re: RFR: 8376568: Change Thread::getStackTrace to use handshake op for all cases [v4] Patricio Chilano Mateo
  • Re: RFR: 8376568: Change Thread::getStackTrace to use handshake op for all cases [v4] Patricio Chilano Mateo
  • Re: RFR: 8376568: Change Thread::getStackTrace to use handshake op for all cases [v4] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8376568: Change Thread::getStackTrace to use handshake op for all cases [v4] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8376568: Change Thread::getStackTrace to use handshake op for all cases [v4] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8376568: Change Thread::getStackTrace to use handshake op for all cases [v4] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8376568: Change Thread::getStackTrace to use handshake op for all cases [v4] Alan Bateman
  • Integrated: 8376568: Change Thread::getStackTrace to use handshake op for all cases Alan Bateman
• RFR: 8376582: Remove assert from default method in java.util.zip.Checksum interface Eirik Bjørsnøs
  • Re: RFR: 8376582: Remove assert from default method in java.util.zip.Checksum interface Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8376582: Remove assert from default method in java.util.zip.Checksum interface Eirik Bjørsnøs
  • Re: RFR: 8376582: Remove assert from default method in java.util.zip.Checksum interface Eirik Bjørsnøs
  • Re: RFR: 8376582: Remove assert from default method in java.util.zip.Checksum interface Eirik Bjørsnøs
  • Re: RFR: 8376582: Remove assert from default method in java.util.zip.Checksum interface Eirik Bjørsnøs
  • Withdrawn: 8376582: Remove assert from default method in java.util.zip.Checksum interface Eirik Bjørsnøs
• Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v18] Jatin Bhateja

• Earlier messages
• Later messages