core-libs-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: RFR: 8381436: Remove Obsolete Translation Resources Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8381436: Remove obsolete translation resources Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8381436: Remove obsolete translation resources Phil Race
  • Re: RFR: 8381436: Remove Obsolete Translation Resources [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8381436: Remove Obsolete Translation Resources [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8381436: Remove Obsolete Translation Resources [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8381436: Remove Obsolete Translation Resources [v2] Phil Race
  • Re: RFR: 8381436: Remove Obsolete Translation Resources [v2] Hai-May Chao
  • Re: RFR: 8381436: Remove Obsolete Translation Resources [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8381436: Remove Obsolete Translation Resources [v2] Iris Clark
  • Re: RFR: 8381436: Remove Obsolete Translation Resources [v2] Justin Lu
  • Integrated: 8381436: Remove Obsolete Translation Resources Justin Lu
• Withdrawn: 8370216: Fix of new File("").exists() causes undefined behavior in libraries Brian Burkhalter
• RFR: 8381384: jpackage: add test coverage to WiX discovery Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8381384: jpackage: add test coverage to WiX discovery Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8381384: jpackage: add test coverage to WiX discovery Alexander Matveev
  • Integrated: 8381384: jpackage: add test coverage to WiX discovery Alexey Semenyuk
• Integrated: 8381367: [lworld] tools/jpackage/share/AppVersionTest.java timed out while reporting errors Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: Integrated: 8381367: [lworld] tools/jpackage/share/AppVersionTest.java timed out while reporting errors Alexander Matveev
  • Re: Integrated: 8381367: [lworld] tools/jpackage/share/AppVersionTest.java timed out while reporting errors Alexey Semenyuk
  • Integrated: 8381367: [lworld] tools/jpackage/share/AppVersionTest.java timed out while reporting errors Alexey Semenyuk
• RFR: 8381377: Reflection APIs should throw NoSuchMethodError for missing classfile methods Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8381377: Reflection APIs should throw NoSuchMethodError for missing classfile methods Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8381377: Reflection APIs should throw NoSuchMethodError for missing classfile methods [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8381377: Reflection APIs should throw NoSuchMethodError for missing classfile methods [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8381377: Reflection APIs should throw NoSuchMethodError for missing classfile methods [v2] ExE Boss
• [External] : digest mode for this list? Yagnatinsky, Mark
• Re: RFR: 8333377: Migrate Generic Signature parsing to ClassFile API [v3] Chen Liang
• RFR: 8381012: Add warning for == for MemorySegment.NULL Ruby Chen
  • Re: RFR: 8381012: Add warning for == for MemorySegment.NULL Maurizio Cimadamore
  • RFR: 8381012: Add warning for == for MemorySegment.NULL Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8381012: Add warning for == for MemorySegment.NULL Ryan Hallock
  • Re: RFR: 8381012: Add warning for == for MemorySegment.NULL Chen Liang
  • Integrated: 8381012: Add warning for == for MemorySegment.NULL Per Minborg
• Re: RFR: 8333377: Migrate Generic Signature parsing to ClassFile API [v2] Chen Liang
• Re: RFR: 8371656: HashMap.putAll() optimizations [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8371656: HashMap.putAll() optimizations [v3] jengebr
  • Re: RFR: 8371656: HashMap.putAll() optimizations [v3] Chen Liang
• Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v9] David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v9] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v9] David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v9] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v9] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v9] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v9] David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v9] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v9] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v9] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v9] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v9] Severin Gehwolf
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v9] Severin Gehwolf
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v9] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v9] Severin Gehwolf
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v9] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v9] Severin Gehwolf
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v9] Severin Gehwolf
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v9] David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v9] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v9] Severin Gehwolf
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v9] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v9] Severin Gehwolf
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v9] David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v9] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v9] Severin Gehwolf
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v9] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v9] Severin Gehwolf
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v9] David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v9] David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v9] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v9] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v9] David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v9] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v9] David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v9] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v9] Severin Gehwolf
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v9] David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v9] David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v9] David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v9] David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v9] Severin Gehwolf
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v9] David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v9] David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v9] David Beaumont
• Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v8] David Beaumont
• Integrated: 8357089: Remove VFORK launch mechanism from Process implementation (linux) Thomas Stuefe
• Withdrawn: 8356116: [macos] Add logging of sign commands in jpackage duke
• RFR: 8381233: Linker and FunctionDescriptor do not need to be value based class Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8381233: Linker and FunctionDescriptor do not need to be value based class ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8381233: Linker and FunctionDescriptor do not need to be value based class ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8381233: Linker and FunctionDescriptor do not need to be value based class Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8381233: Linker and FunctionDescriptor do not need to be value based class Yasumasa Suenaga
• JEP draft: HTTP over Unix Domain Sockets Michael McMahon
  • [External] : Re: JEP draft: HTTP over Unix Domain Sockets Florian Weimer
• [External] : weakly consistent iterators spec seems misleading? Yagnatinsky, Mark
  • Re: [External] : weakly consistent iterators spec seems misleading? Viktor Klang
  • RE: [External] : weakly consistent iterators spec seems misleading? Yagnatinsky, Mark
  • Re: [External] : weakly consistent iterators spec seems misleading? Viktor Klang
  • RE: [External] : weakly consistent iterators spec seems misleading? Yagnatinsky, Mark
  • Re: [External] : weakly consistent iterators spec seems misleading? Viktor Klang
  • RE: [External] : weakly consistent iterators spec seems misleading? Yagnatinsky, Mark
  • Re: [External] : weakly consistent iterators spec seems misleading? Viktor Klang
  • RE: [External] : weakly consistent iterators spec seems misleading? Yagnatinsky, Mark
  • Re: [External] : weakly consistent iterators spec seems misleading? Viktor Klang
  • RE: [External] : weakly consistent iterators spec seems misleading? Yagnatinsky, Mark
• RFR: 8380968: classfile package doc mentions nonexistent UtfEntry Benjamin Peterson
  • Re: RFR: 8380968: classfile package doc mentions nonexistent UtfEntry Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8380968: classfile package doc mentions nonexistent UtfEntry [v2] Benjamin Peterson
  • Re: RFR: 8380968: classfile package doc mentions nonexistent UtfEntry [v2] Benjamin Peterson
  • Re: RFR: 8380968: classfile package doc mentions nonexistent UtfEntry [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8380968: classfile package doc mentions nonexistent UtfEntry [v2] Chen Liang
  • Integrated: 8380968: classfile package doc mentions nonexistent UtfEntry Benjamin Peterson
• RFR: 8380960: "Foreign function access" discussion links to wrong downcallHandle overload Benjamin Peterson
  • Re: RFR: 8380960: "Foreign function access" discussion links to wrong downcallHandle overload Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8380960: "Foreign function access" discussion links to wrong downcallHandle overload [v2] Benjamin Peterson
  • Re: RFR: 8380960: "Foreign function access" discussion links to wrong downcallHandle overload [v2] duke
  • Re: RFR: 8380960: "Foreign function access" discussion links to wrong downcallHandle overload [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Integrated: 8380960: "Foreign function access" discussion links to wrong downcallHandle overload Benjamin Peterson
• RFR: 8379679: java/foreign/TestConcurrentClose.java awaitTermination times out on Windows debug builds Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8379679: java/foreign/TestConcurrentClose.java awaitTermination times out on Windows debug builds Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8379679: java/foreign/TestConcurrentClose.java awaitTermination times out on Windows debug builds Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8379679: java/foreign/TestConcurrentClose.java awaitTermination times out on Windows debug builds [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8379679: java/foreign/TestConcurrentClose.java awaitTermination times out on Windows debug builds [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8379679: java/foreign/TestConcurrentClose.java awaitTermination times out on Windows debug builds [v2] Chen Liang
  • Integrated: 8379679: java/foreign/TestConcurrentClose.java awaitTermination times out on Windows debug builds Chen Liang
• RFR: 8380990: Update testng and junit tests to use diagnoseConfigurationIssue() method and post processing serhiysachkov
  • Re: RFR: 8380990: Update testng and junit tests to use diagnoseConfigurationIssue() method and post processing [v2] serhiysachkov
  • Re: RFR: 8380990: Update testng and junit tests to use diagnoseConfigurationIssue() method and post processing [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8380990: Update testng and junit tests to use diagnoseConfigurationIssue() method and post processing [v3] serhiysachkov
  • Re: RFR: 8380990: Update testng and junit tests to use diagnoseConfigurationIssue() method and post processing [v4] serhiysachkov
  • Re: RFR: 8380990: Update testng and junit tests to use diagnoseConfigurationIssue() method and post processing [v4] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8380990: Update testng and junit tests to use diagnoseConfigurationIssue() method and post processing [v4] serhiysachkov
  • Re: RFR: 8380990: Update testng and junit tests to use diagnoseConfigurationIssue() method and post processing [v4] Christian Stein
  • Re: RFR: 8380990: Update testng and junit tests to use diagnoseConfigurationIssue() method and post processing [v4] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8380990: Update testng and junit tests to use diagnoseConfigurationIssue() method and post processing [v5] serhiysachkov
  • Re: RFR: 8380990: Update testng and junit tests to use diagnoseConfigurationIssue() method and post processing [v5] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8380990: Update testng and junit tests to use diagnoseConfigurationIssue() method and post processing [v5] serhiysachkov
  • Re: RFR: 8380990: Update testng and junit tests to use diagnoseConfigurationIssue() method and post processing [v6] serhiysachkov
  • Re: RFR: 8380990: Update testng and junit tests to use diagnoseConfigurationIssue() method and post processing [v7] serhiysachkov
  • Re: RFR: 8380990: Update testng and junit tests to use diagnoseConfigurationIssue() method and post processing [v7] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8380990: Update testng and junit tests to use diagnoseConfigurationIssue() method and post processing [v7] serhiysachkov
  • Re: RFR: 8380990: Update testng and junit tests to use diagnoseConfigurationIssue() method and post processing [v8] serhiysachkov
  • Re: RFR: 8380990: Update testng and junit tests to use diagnoseConfigurationIssue() method and post processing [v8] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8380990: Update testng and junit tests to use diagnoseConfigurationIssue() method and post processing [v8] duke
  • Integrated: 8380990: Update testng and junit tests to use diagnoseConfigurationIssue() method and post processing serhiysachkov
• RFR: 8380288: The test java/util/TimeZone/CustomTzIDCheckDST.java does fail on AIX after JDK-8375045 Arno Zeller
  • Re: RFR: 8380288: The test java/util/TimeZone/CustomTzIDCheckDST.java does fail on AIX after JDK-8375045 Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8380288: The test java/util/TimeZone/CustomTzIDCheckDST.java does fail on AIX after JDK-8375045 Martin Doerr
  • Re: RFR: 8380288: [BACKOUT] Incorrect Interpretation of POSIX TZ Environment Variable on AIX Arno Zeller
  • Re: RFR: 8380288: [BACKOUT] Incorrect Interpretation of POSIX TZ Environment Variable on AIX duke
  • Integrated: 8380288: [BACKOUT] Incorrect Interpretation of POSIX TZ Environment Variable on AIX Arno Zeller
• RFR: 8380955: Value-based classes in FFM should have @ValueBased Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8380955: Value-based classes in FFM should have @ValueBased Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8380955: Value-based classes in FFM should have @ValueBased Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8380955: Value-based classes in FFM should have @ValueBased Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8380955: Value-based classes in FFM should have @ValueBased Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8380955: Value-based classes in FFM should have @ValueBased ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8380955: Value-based classes in FFM should have @ValueBased Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8380955: Value-based classes in FFM should have @ValueBased Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8380955: Value-based classes in FFM should have @ValueBased Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8380955: Value-based classes in FFM should have @ValueBased Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8380955: Value-based classes in FFM should have @ValueBased Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8380955: Value-based classes in FFM should have @ValueBased [v2] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8380955: Value-based classes in FFM should have @ValueBased [v2] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8380955: Value-based classes in FFM should have @ValueBased [v3] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8380955: Value-based classes in FFM should have @ValueBased [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8380955: Value-based classes in FFM should have @ValueBased [v3] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8380955: Value-based classes in FFM should have @ValueBased [v3] Per Minborg
  • Integrated: 8380955: Value-based classes in FFM should have @ValueBased Yasumasa Suenaga
• RFR: 8380956: HexFormat shoud have @ValueBased Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8380956: HexFormat shoud have @ValueBased Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8380956: HexFormat shoud have @ValueBased Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8380956: HexFormat shoud have @ValueBased Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8380956: HexFormat shoud have @ValueBased Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8380956: HexFormat shoud have @ValueBased Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8380956: HexFormat shoud have @ValueBased Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8380956: HexFormat shoud have @ValueBased Alan Bateman
  • Integrated: 8380956: HexFormat shoud have @ValueBased Yasumasa Suenaga
• RFR: 8380634: [macos] MacOS versions cannot start with 0 Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8380634: [macos] MacOS versions cannot start with 0 Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8380634: [macos] MacOS versions cannot start with 0 Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8380634: [macos] MacOS versions cannot start with 0 Nir Lisker
  • Re: RFR: 8380634: [macos] MacOS versions cannot start with 0 [v2] Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8380634: [macos] MacOS versions cannot start with 0 [v2] Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8380634: [macos] MacOS versions cannot start with 0 [v2] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8380634: [macos] Remove macOS version restrictions on start with zero and limit to three components [v2] Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8380634: [macos] Remove macOS version restrictions on start with zero and limit to three components [v3] Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8380634: [macos] Remove macOS version restrictions on start with zero and limit to three components [v3] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Integrated: 8380634: [macos] Remove macOS version restrictions on start with zero and limit to three components Alexander Matveev
• Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v63] Doug Lea
  • Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v63] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v63] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v63] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v63] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v63] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v63] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v63] Viktor Klang
• RFR: 8380940: [test] More DerValue manipulation methods Weijun Wang
• RFR: 8380915: Cleanup some Java declarations of the Vector API Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8380915: Cleanup some Java declarations of the Vector API Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8380915: Cleanup some Java declarations of the Vector API Andrey Turbanov

• Earlier messages
• Later messages