core-libs-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: RFR: 8388366: Launcher test stability regardless of the default locale [v2] by1361092
  • Re: RFR: 8388366: Launcher test stability regardless of the default locale [v2] by1361092
  • Re: RFR: 8388366: Launcher test stability regardless of the default locale [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8388366: Launcher test stability regardless of the default locale [v2] by1361092
  • Re: RFR: 8388366: Launcher test stability regardless of the default locale [v3] by1361092
  • Re: RFR: 8388366: Launcher test stability regardless of the default locale [v4] by1361092
  • Re: RFR: 8388366: Launcher test stability regardless of the default locale [v5] by1361092
  • Re: RFR: 8388366: Launcher test stability regardless of the default locale [v5] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8388366: Launcher test stability regardless of the default locale [v5] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8388366: Launcher test stability regardless of the default locale [v5] duke
  • Integrated: 8388366: Launcher test stability regardless of the default locale by1361092
• RFR: 8389539: Clarify equivalence class sizing with value objects Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8389539: Clarify equivalence class sizing with value objects Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8389539: Clarify equivalence class sizing with value objects John R Rose
  • Re: RFR: 8389539: Clarify equivalence class sizing with value objects Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8389539: Clarify equivalence class sizing with value objects Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8389539: Clarify equivalence class sizing with value objects Dan Smith
  • Re: RFR: 8389539: Clarify equivalence class sizing with value objects Dan Smith
  • Re: RFR: 8389539: Clarify equivalence class sizing with value objects Dan Smith
  • Re: RFR: 8389539: Clarify equivalence class sizing with value objects Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8389539: Clarify equivalence class sizing with value objects Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8389539: Clarify equivalence class sizing with value objects Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8389539: Clarify equivalence class sizing with value objects Joe Darcy
• Re: RFR: 8344159: Add lint warnings for unnecessary warning suppression [v16] Archie Cobbs
• RFR: 8252185: [lworld] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects Marc Chevalier
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [lworld] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [lworld] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects Marc Chevalier
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [lworld] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects Marc Chevalier
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [lworld] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v4] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [lworld] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v5] Marc Chevalier
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [lworld] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects Marc Chevalier
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [lworld] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v2] Marc Chevalier
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [lworld] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v2] Marc Chevalier
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [lworld] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v3] Marc Chevalier
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [lworld] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v3] Marc Chevalier
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [lworld] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v4] Marc Chevalier
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [lworld] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v4] ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [lworld] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v4] Marc Chevalier
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [lworld] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v4] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [lworld] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v5] Marc Chevalier
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [lworld] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v5] Marc Chevalier
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [Valhalla] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v5] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [Valhalla] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v5] Frederic Parain
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [Valhalla] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v5] Marc Chevalier
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [Valhalla] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v6] Marc Chevalier
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [Valhalla] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v7] Marc Chevalier
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [Valhalla] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v8] Marc Chevalier
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [Valhalla] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v9] Marc Chevalier
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [Valhalla] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v9] Frederic Parain
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [Valhalla] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v9] Marc Chevalier
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [Valhalla] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v10] Marc Chevalier
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [Valhalla] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v10] Frederic Parain
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [Valhalla] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v10] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: RFR: 8252185: [Valhalla] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects [v10] Marc Chevalier
  • Integrated: 8252185: [Valhalla] Improve performance of identityHashCode for value objects Marc Chevalier
• Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v114] Doug Lea
• RFR: 8388400: [lworld] Incorrect null check in jdk.internal.jrtfs.ExplodedImage$PathNode constructor Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8388400: [lworld] Incorrect null check in jdk.internal.jrtfs.ExplodedImage$PathNode constructor Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8388400: [lworld] Incorrect null check in jdk.internal.jrtfs.ExplodedImage$PathNode constructor Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8388400: [lworld] Incorrect null check in jdk.internal.jrtfs.ExplodedImage$PathNode constructor Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8388400: Incorrect null check in jdk.internal.jrtfs.ExplodedImage$PathNode constructor Jaikiran Pai
  • Integrated: 8388400: Incorrect null check in jdk.internal.jrtfs.ExplodedImage$PathNode constructor Jaikiran Pai
• RFR: 8385616: [VectorAPI] Remove VectorOperators.OR fallback handling for floating point vectors Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8385616: [VectorAPI] Remove VectorOperators.OR fallback handling for floating point vectors Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8385616: [VectorAPI] Remove VectorOperators.OR fallback handling for floating point vectors Xueming Shen
  • Re: RFR: 8385616: [VectorAPI] Remove VectorOperators.OR fallback handling for floating point vectors Xueming Shen
  • Re: RFR: 8385616: [VectorAPI] Remove VectorOperators.OR fallback handling for floating point vectors Paul Sandoz
  • Re: RFR: 8385616: [VectorAPI] Remove VectorOperators.OR fallback handling for floating point vectors Jatin Bhateja
  • Integrated: 8385616: [VectorAPI] Remove VectorOperators.OR fallback handling for floating point vectors Jatin Bhateja
• Withdrawn: 8374154: Rewrite JAAS NTLoginModule with FFM duke
• RFR: 8385593: Clarify the wording of UnsupportedClassVersionError David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8385593: Clarify the wording of UnsupportedClassVersionError Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8385593: Clarify the wording of UnsupportedClassVersionError [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8385593: Clarify the wording of UnsupportedClassVersionError [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8385593: Clarify the wording of UnsupportedClassVersionError [v2] Paul Hübner
  • Re: RFR: 8385593: Clarify the wording of UnsupportedClassVersionError [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8385593: Clarify the wording of UnsupportedClassVersionError [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8385593: Clarify the wording of UnsupportedClassVersionError [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8385593: Clarify the wording of UnsupportedClassVersionError [v3] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8385593: Clarify the wording of UnsupportedClassVersionError [v3] Fredrik Bredberg
  • Re: RFR: 8385593: Clarify the wording of UnsupportedClassVersionError [v3] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8385593: Clarify the wording of UnsupportedClassVersionError [v3] Paul Hübner
  • Integrated: 8385593: Clarify the wording of UnsupportedClassVersionError David Holmes
• RFR: 8388448: VarHandle can set @NullRestricted static field to null Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8388448: VarHandle can set @NullRestricted static field to null Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8388448: VarHandle can set @NullRestricted static field to null Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8388448: VarHandle can set @NullRestricted static field to null Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8388448: VarHandle can set @NullRestricted static field to null Chen Liang
  • Integrated: 8388448: VarHandle can set @NullRestricted static field to null Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8388448: VarHandle can set @NullRestricted static field to null Chen Liang
• RFR: 8388527: Add "indistinguishable" cross-reference to Double's discussion of equality Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8388527: Add "indistinguishable" cross-reference to Double's discussion of equality Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8388527: Add "indistinguishable" cross-reference to Double's discussion of equality Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8388527: Add "indistinguishable" cross-reference to Double's discussion of equality Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8388527: Add "indistinguishable" cross-reference to Double's discussion of equality Dan Smith
  • Re: RFR: 8388527: Add "indistinguishable" cross-reference to Double's discussion of equality Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8388527: Add "indistinguishable" cross-reference to Double's discussion of equality [v2] Dan Smith
  • Re: RFR: 8388527: Add "indistinguishable" cross-reference to Double's discussion of equality [v2] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8388527: Add "indistinguishable" cross-reference to Double's discussion of equality [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8388527: Add "indistinguishable" cross-reference to Double's discussion of equality Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8388527: Add "indistinguishable" cross-reference to Double's discussion of equality Joe Darcy
  • Integrated: 8388527: Add "indistinguishable" cross-reference to Double's discussion of equality Joe Darcy
• Withdrawn: 8317278: JVM implementation of value objects David Simms
• Withdrawn: 8317277: Java language implementation of value objects David Simms
• Withdrawn: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value objects David Simms
• Integrated: 8389219: Implement JEP 401: Value Objects (Preview) David Simms
• Re: RFR: 8389219: Implement JEP 401: Value Objects (Preview) [v11] David Simms
  • Re: RFR: 8389219: Implement JEP 401: Value Objects (Preview) [v11] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8389219: Implement JEP 401: Value Objects (Preview) [v11] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8389219: Implement JEP 401: Value Objects (Preview) [v11] Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: RFR: 8389219: Implement JEP 401: Value Objects (Preview) [v11] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8389219: Implement JEP 401: Value Objects (Preview) [v11] Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: RFR: 8389219: Implement JEP 401: Value Objects (Preview) [v11] Axel Boldt-Christmas
  • Re: RFR: 8389219: Implement JEP 401: Value Objects (Preview) [v11] Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: RFR: 8389219: Implement JEP 401: Value Objects (Preview) [v11] Daniel D . Daugherty
  • Re: RFR: 8389219: Implement JEP 401: Value Objects (Preview) [v11] duke
  • Re: RFR: 8389219: Implement JEP 401: Value Objects (Preview) [v11] Daniel D . Daugherty
• RFR: 8389282: Add explicit statement on null-handling of structural types in java.util.function Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8389282: Add explicit statement on null-handling of structural types in java.util.function Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8389282: Add explicit statement on null-handling of structural types in java.util.function [v2] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8389282: Add explicit statement on null-handling of structural types in java.util.function [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8389282: Add explicit statement on null-handling of structural types in java.util.function [v2] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8389282: Add explicit statement on null-handling of structural types in java.util.function [v2] Jean-Noël Rouvignac
  • Re: RFR: 8389282: Add explicit statement on null-handling of structural types in java.util.function [v2] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8389282: Add explicit statement on null-handling of structural types in java.util.function [v2] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8389282: Add explicit statement on null-handling of structural types in java.util.function [v2] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8389282: Add explicit statement on null-handling of structural types in java.util.function [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8389282: Add explicit statement on null-handling of structural types in java.util.function [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8389282: Add explicit statement on null-handling of structural types in java.util.function [v2] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8389282: Add explicit statement on null-handling of structural types in java.util.function [v3] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8389282: Add explicit statement on null-handling of structural types in java.util.function [v4] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8389282: Add explicit statement on null-handling of structural types in java.util.function [v4] Stuart Marks
• RFR: 8389466: Clarify Class::desiredAssertionStatus for primitive and array types Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8389466: Clarify Class::desiredAssertionStatus for primitive and array types Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8389466: Clarify Class::desiredAssertionStatus for primitive and array types [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8389466: Clarify Class::desiredAssertionStatus for primitive and array types [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8389466: Clarify Class::desiredAssertionStatus for primitive and array types [v2] Chen Liang
  • Integrated: 8389466: Clarify Class::desiredAssertionStatus for primitive and array types Chen Liang
• RFR: 8389468: Introduce Class::isClassOrInterface Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8389468: Introduce Class::isClassOrInterface Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8389468: Introduce Class::isClassOrInterface Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8389468: Introduce Class::isClassOrInterface Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8389468: Introduce Class::isClassOrInterface [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8389468: Introduce Class::isClassOrInterface [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8389468: Introduce Class::isClassOrInterface [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8389468: Introduce Class::isClassOrInterface [v2] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8389468: Introduce Class::isClassOrInterface [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8389468: Introduce Class::isClassOrInterface [v2] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8389468: Introduce Class::isClassOrInterface [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8389468: Introduce Class::isClassOrInterface [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8389468: Introduce Class::isClassOrInterface [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8389468: Introduce Class::isClassOrInterface [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8389468: Introduce Class::isClassOrInterface [v4] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8389468: Introduce Class::isClassOrInterface [v4] Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8389468: Introduce Class::isClassOrInterface [v4] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8389468: Introduce Class::isClassOrInterface [v4] ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8389468: Introduce Class::isClassOrInterface [v4] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8389468: Introduce Class::isClassOrInterface [v5] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8389468: Introduce Class::isClassOrInterface [v5] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8389468: Introduce Class::isClassOrInterface [v5] Chen Liang
• RFR: 8389455: Avoid local initialized unused variables in libjimage Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8389455: Avoid local initialized unused variables in libjimage Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8389455: Avoid local initialized unused variables in libjimage [v2] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8389455: Avoid local initialized unused variables in libjimage [v2] Goetz Lindenmaier
  • Re: RFR: 8389455: Avoid local initialized unused variables in libjimage [v2] Matthias Baesken
  • Integrated: 8389455: Avoid local initialized unused variables in libjimage Matthias Baesken
• Integrated: 8388991: Adjust relauncher.c to avoid unused variable and init STARTUPINFO as suggested Matthias Baesken
• RFR: 8357394: Add JDK specific property for external resource access Joe Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8357394: Add JDK specific property for external resource access Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8357394: Add JDK specific property for external resource access Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8357394: Add JDK specific property for external resource access [v2] Joe Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8357394: Add JDK specific property for external resource access [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8357394: Add JDK specific property for external resource access [v3] Joe Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8357394: Add JDK specific property for external resource access Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8357394: Add JDK specific property for external resource access [v2] Joe Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8357394: Add JDK specific property for external resource access Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8357394: Add JDK specific property for external resource access Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8357394: Add JDK specific property for external resource access [v2] Joe Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8357394: Add JDK specific property for external resource access [v2] Joe Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8357394: Add JDK specific property for external resource access [v3] Joe Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8357394: Add JDK specific property for external resource access [v4] Joe Wang
• Re: RFR: 8388991: Adjust relauncher.c to avoid unused variable and init STARTUPINFO as suggested David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8388991: Adjust relauncher.c to avoid unused variable and init STARTUPINFO as suggested Matthias Baesken
• RFR: 8388918: AArch64: Optimize vector and vector mask (A & B) ^ B to BIC instruction Eric Fang
  • Re: RFR: 8388918: AArch64: Optimize vector and vector mask (A & B) ^ B to BIC instruction Dean Long
  • Re: RFR: 8388918: AArch64: Optimize vector and vector mask (A & B) ^ B to BIC instruction Eric Fang
  • Re: RFR: 8388918: AArch64: Optimize vector and vector mask (A & B) ^ B to BIC instruction Andrew Haley
  • Re: RFR: 8388918: AArch64: Optimize vector and vector mask (A & B) ^ B to BIC instruction Eric Fang
  • Re: RFR: 8388918: C2: Optimize vector and vector mask (A & B) ^ B to ~A & B [v2] Eric Fang
  • Re: RFR: 8388918: C2: Optimize vector and vector mask (A & B) ^ B to ~A & B [v2] Eric Fang
  • Re: RFR: 8388918: C2: Optimize vector and vector mask (A & B) ^ B to ~A & B [v2] Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: RFR: 8388918: C2: Optimize vector and vector mask (A & B) ^ B to ~A & B [v2] Eric Fang
  • Re: RFR: 8388918: C2: Optimize vector and vector mask (A & B) ^ B to ~A & B [v2] Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: RFR: 8388918: C2: Optimize vector and vector mask (A & B) ^ B to ~A & B [v2] Eric Fang
  • Re: RFR: 8388918: C2: Optimize vector and vector mask (A & B) ^ B to ~A & B [v2] Quan Anh Mai
  • Re: RFR: 8388918: C2: Optimize vector and vector mask (A & B) ^ B to ~A & B [v2] Eric Fang
• RFR: 8387748: VectorAPI: AArch64: Improve VectorMask.lastTrue() SVE implementation Eric Fang
  • Re: RFR: 8387748: VectorAPI: AArch64: Improve VectorMask.lastTrue() SVE implementation Eric Fang
  • Re: RFR: 8387748: VectorAPI: AArch64: Improve VectorMask.lastTrue() SVE implementation Ruben Ayrapetyan
• Re: RFR: 8384062: Add a new method List::removeAt to avoid overload confusion [v4] Chen Liang

• Earlier messages
• Later messages