On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 12:19:41 GMT, Jaikiran Pai <j...@openjdk.org> wrote:

> Can I please get a review of this change which removes the `java.compiler` 
> system property? This addresses https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8041676.
> 
> A CSR has been filed for this change and is available at 
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8305998. The CSR has more details about 
> this proposed change, but to summarize, the `java.compiler` system property 
> wasn't used in any practical way. With the recent removal of 
> `java.lang.Compiler` interface from the JDK, the presence of this system 
> property wasn't of any practical importance.
> 
> The commit in this PR, removes its reference from the 
> `System.getProperties()` documentation and also removes the specific 
> implementation from hotspot where it treated the values `NONE` and empty 
> string in the absence of `-Xdebug` in a specific manner and considered it to 
> be an instruction to run the application in interpreter-only mode. `-Xint` 
> option has been around for this purpose, so removal of this `java.compiler` 
> system property support from hotspot implementation wouldn't remove any 
> usable feature for the applications.
> 
> Additionally, the hotspot implementation now logs a warning message when it 
> detects the presence of `java.compiler` system property when `java` is 
> launched. This warning message will be removed after a few releases.
> 
> The current JDK source has reference to the `java.compiler` system property 
> in numerous NetBeans project build files. The usage of this system property 
> in such files isn't necessary. However, this PR doesn't intend to cleanup 
> those references, since it isn't clear which of those NetBeans projects are 
> still relevant. I think we can use a separate PR to do that cleanup.
> 
> tier1, tier2, tier3 testing has been done with these changes and those tests 
> have passed.

Code changes look good. Thanks for cleaning this up.

-------------

Marked as reviewed by dholmes (Reviewer).

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13475#pullrequestreview-1385427592

Reply via email to