On Mon, 17 Apr 2023 13:27:43 GMT, olivergillespie <d...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> > Why isn't `Enum::hashCode` simply doing `return ordinal;`? > > See https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8050217 Thanks! If there are apps where `Enum::hashCode` is performance sensitive then run-to-run stability may be a stronger argument than @stuart-marks et al argues it is here, though there might be some unspoken arguments about how it might affect iteration order et.c... Adding a cached field to `Enum` seem innocuous though, whether it disappears into a padding gap or not. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13491#issuecomment-1511370298
