On Thu, 20 Apr 2023 00:40:44 GMT, Jorn Vernee <jver...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Also, isn't it the case that, for structs, we want the size of the layout to >> be a multiple of its alignment constraint? > > The third item in the list is for group size needing to be a multiple of the > alignment constraint, the forth item refers to that, so I'll keep the ordered > list. > > WRT byte order: I think it's fine to just say "native byte order". Keep it > simple. Or do you think there might be confusion about the meaning of > "native"? (It looks like not even ByteOrder::nativeOrder explains that term: > https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/20/docs/api/java.base/java/nio/ByteOrder.html#nativeOrder()) > > "padding layout elements" is not quite right I think, since they also have to > be the right size. I think saying just "padding" is more accurate (and > simpler). > > I'll switch to using plain links instead. Uploaded another version ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13164#discussion_r1171979964
