core-libs-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: RFR: 8378431: Move input validation checks to Java for java.lang.StringUTF16 intrinsics [v3] Damon Fenacci
  • Re: RFR: 8378431: Move input validation checks to Java for java.lang.StringUTF16 intrinsics [v3] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8378431: Move input validation checks to Java for java.lang.StringUTF16 intrinsics [v3] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8378431: Move input validation checks to Java for java.lang.StringUTF16 intrinsics [v4] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8378431: Move input validation checks to Java for java.lang.StringUTF16 intrinsics [v4] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8378431: Move input validation checks to Java for java.lang.StringUTF16 intrinsics [v4] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8378431: Move input validation checks to Java for java.lang.StringUTF16 intrinsics [v4] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8378431: Move input validation checks to Java for java.lang.StringUTF16 intrinsics [v4] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8378431: Move input validation checks to Java for java.lang.StringUTF16 intrinsics [v4] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8378431: Move input validation checks to Java for java.lang.StringUTF16 intrinsics [v5] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8378431: Move input validation checks to Java for java.lang.StringUTF16 intrinsics [v5] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8378431: Move input validation checks to Java for java.lang.StringUTF16 intrinsics [v5] Damon Fenacci
  • Re: RFR: 8378431: Move input validation checks to Java for java.lang.StringUTF16 intrinsics [v5] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8378431: Move input validation checks to Java for java.lang.StringUTF16 intrinsics [v6] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8378431: Move input validation checks to Java for java.lang.StringUTF16 intrinsics [v6] Damon Fenacci
  • Re: RFR: 8378431: Move input validation checks to Java for java.lang.StringUTF16 intrinsics [v6] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8378431: Move input validation checks to Java for java.lang.StringUTF16 intrinsics [v6] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Integrated: 8378431: Move input validation checks to Java for java.lang.StringUTF16 intrinsics Volkan Yazici
• Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v28] Jatin Bhateja
• Re: RFR: 8364007: Add no-argument codePointCount method to CharSequence and String [v24] Tatsunori Uchino
• Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v51] Doug Lea
• RFR: 8379437: Refactor ProcessBuilder and ProcessHandle tests to JUnit Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8379437: Refactor ProcessBuilder and ProcessHandle tests to JUnit Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8379437: Refactor ProcessBuilder and ProcessHandle tests to JUnit Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8379437: Refactor ProcessBuilder and ProcessHandle tests to JUnit Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8379437: Refactor ProcessBuilder and ProcessHandle tests to JUnit Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8379437: Refactor ProcessBuilder and ProcessHandle tests to JUnit Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8379437: Refactor ProcessBuilder and ProcessHandle tests to JUnit [v2] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8379437: Refactor ProcessBuilder and ProcessHandle tests to JUnit [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8379437: Refactor ProcessBuilder and ProcessHandle tests to JUnit [v3] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8379437: Refactor ProcessBuilder and ProcessHandle tests to JUnit [v3] Jaikiran Pai
  • Integrated: 8379437: Refactor ProcessBuilder and ProcessHandle tests to JUnit Roger Riggs
• Withdrawn: 8371795: Improve documentation of Class.isInstance duke
• Withdrawn: 8374342: Remove incorrect @throws NoSuchFileException from test/lib/jdk/test/lib/util/FileUtils.javaFileUtils.java duke
• RFR: 8379443: Correct build tags in some math tests Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8379443: Correct build tags in some math tests Iris Clark
  • Integrated: 8379443: Correct build tags in some math tests Joe Darcy
• RFR: 8379441: Refactor jaxp/javax catalog tests to use JUnit David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8379441: Refactor jaxp/javax catalog tests to use JUnit David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8379441: Refactor jaxp/javax catalog tests to use JUnit David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8379441: Refactor jaxp/javax catalog tests to use JUnit Joe Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8379441: Refactor jaxp/javax catalog tests to use JUnit Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8379441: Refactor jaxp/javax catalog tests to use JUnit duke
  • Integrated: 8379441: Refactor jaxp/javax catalog tests to use JUnit David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8379441: Refactor jaxp/javax catalog tests to use JUnit Daniel Fuchs
• RFR: 8378295: Update scalar AVX10 floating point min/max definitions Mohamed Issa
  • Re: RFR: 8378295: Update scalar AVX10 floating point min/max definitions [v2] Mohamed Issa
  • Re: RFR: 8378295: Update scalar AVX10 floating point min/max definitions [v2] Sandhya Viswanathan
  • Re: RFR: 8378295: Update scalar AVX10 floating point min/max definitions [v2] Mohamed Issa
  • Re: RFR: 8378295: Update scalar AVX10 floating point min/max definitions [v2] Sandhya Viswanathan
  • Re: RFR: 8378295: Update scalar AVX10 floating point min/max definitions [v2] Sandhya Viswanathan
  • Re: RFR: 8378295: Update scalar AVX10 floating point min/max definitions [v3] Mohamed Issa
  • Re: RFR: 8378295: Update scalar AVX10 floating point min/max definitions [v3] Sandhya Viswanathan
  • Re: RFR: 8378295: Update scalar AVX10 floating point min/max definitions [v3] Mohamed Issa
  • Re: RFR: 8378295: Update scalar AVX10 floating point min/max definitions [v4] Mohamed Issa
  • Re: RFR: 8378295: Update scalar AVX10 floating point min/max definitions [v4] Sandhya Viswanathan
  • Re: RFR: 8378295: Update scalar AVX10 floating point min/max definitions [v4] Mohamed Issa
  • Re: RFR: 8378295: Update scalar AVX10 floating point min/max definitions [v5] Mohamed Issa
  • Re: RFR: 8378295: Update scalar AVX10 floating point min/max definitions [v5] Sandhya Viswanathan
  • Re: RFR: 8378295: Update scalar AVX10 floating point min/max definitions [v5] Mohamed Issa
  • Re: RFR: 8378295: Update scalar AVX10 floating point min/max definitions [v5] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8378295: Update scalar AVX10 floating point min/max definitions [v5] Manuel Hässig
  • Re: RFR: 8378295: Update scalar AVX10 floating point min/max definitions [v5] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8378295: Update scalar AVX10 floating point min/max definitions [v5] Srinivas Vamsi Parasa
  • Re: RFR: 8378295: Update scalar AVX10 floating point min/max definitions [v6] Mohamed Issa
  • Re: RFR: 8378295: Update scalar AVX10 floating point min/max definitions [v6] duke
  • Integrated: 8378295: Update scalar AVX10 floating point min/max definitions Mohamed Issa
• RFR: 8379432: jpackage: Make default equals() in jdk.jpackage.test.CannedFormattedString class work as expected Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8379432: jpackage: Make default equals() in jdk.jpackage.test.CannedFormattedString class work as expected Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8379432: jpackage: Make default equals() in jdk.jpackage.test.CannedFormattedString class work as expected Alexander Matveev
  • Integrated: 8379432: jpackage: Make default equals() in jdk.jpackage.test.CannedFormattedString class work as expected Alexey Semenyuk
• RFR: 8379426: [macos] jpackage: runtime bundle version suffix is out of sync with the version property in the Info.plist file Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8379426: [macos] jpackage: runtime bundle version suffix is out of sync with the version property in the Info.plist file Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8379426: [macos] jpackage: runtime bundle version suffix is out of sync with the version property in the Info.plist file Alexander Matveev
  • Integrated: 8379426: [macos] jpackage: runtime bundle version suffix is out of sync with the version property in the Info.plist file Alexey Semenyuk
• RFR: 8379284: Avoid the need to keep obsolette preview feature constants until bootstrap JDK is upgraded Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: 8379284: Avoid the need to keep obsolette preview feature constants until bootstrap JDK is upgraded Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8379284: Avoid the need to keep obsolette preview feature constants until bootstrap JDK is upgraded Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: 8379284: Avoid the need to keep obsolette preview feature constants until bootstrap JDK is upgraded ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8379284: Avoid the need to keep obsolette preview feature constants until bootstrap JDK is upgraded Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: 8379284: Avoid the need to keep obsolette preview feature constants until bootstrap JDK is upgraded Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8379284: Avoid the need to keep obsolete preview feature constants until bootstrap JDK is upgraded [v2] Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: 8379284: Avoid the need to keep obsolete preview feature constants until bootstrap JDK is upgraded [v2] Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: 8379284: Avoid the need to keep obsolete preview feature constants until bootstrap JDK is upgraded [v2] Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8379284: Avoid the need to keep obsolete preview feature constants until bootstrap JDK is upgraded [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8379284: Avoid the need to keep obsolete preview feature constants until bootstrap JDK is upgraded [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8379284: Avoid the need to keep obsolete preview feature constants until bootstrap JDK is upgraded [v2] Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: 8379284: Avoid the need to keep obsolete preview feature constants until bootstrap JDK is upgraded [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8379284: Avoid the need to keep obsolete preview feature constants until bootstrap JDK is upgraded [v3] Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: 8379284: Avoid the need to keep obsolete preview feature constants until bootstrap JDK is upgraded [v3] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8379284: Avoid the need to keep obsolete preview feature constants until bootstrap JDK is upgraded [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8379284: Avoid the need to keep obsolete preview feature constants until bootstrap JDK is upgraded [v3] ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8379284: Avoid the need to keep obsolete preview feature constants until bootstrap JDK is upgraded [v3] Vicente Romero
  • Re: RFR: 8379284: Avoid the need to keep obsolete preview feature constants until bootstrap JDK is upgraded [v4] Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: 8379284: Avoid the need to keep obsolete preview feature constants until bootstrap JDK is upgraded [v4] Chen Liang
  • Integrated: 8379284: Avoid the need to keep obsolete preview feature constants until bootstrap JDK is upgraded Jan Lahoda
• RFR: 8364025: MinMaxVector clipping range benchmark highestInt/Long can overflow Galder Zamarreño
  • Re: RFR: 8364025: MinMaxVector clipping range benchmark highestInt/Long can overflow Galder Zamarreño
  • Re: RFR: 8364025: MinMaxVector clipping range benchmark highestInt/Long can overflow Galder Zamarreño
  • Re: RFR: 8364025: MinMaxVector clipping range benchmark highestInt/Long can overflow Roland Westrelin
• RFR: 8379195: Refactor Arrays TestNG tests to use JUnit Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8379195: Refactor Arrays TestNG tests to use JUnit Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8379195: Refactor Arrays TestNG tests to use JUnit Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8379195: Refactor Arrays TestNG tests to use JUnit Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8379195: Refactor Arrays TestNG tests to use JUnit [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8379195: Refactor Arrays TestNG tests to use JUnit [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8379195: Refactor Arrays TestNG tests to use JUnit Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8379195: Refactor Arrays TestNG tests to use JUnit [v2] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8379195: Refactor Arrays TestNG tests to use JUnit [v3] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8379195: Refactor Arrays TestNG tests to use JUnit [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Integrated: 8379195: Refactor Arrays TestNG tests to use JUnit Raffaello Giulietti
• RFR: 8375130: [BACKOUT] Scalability issue when submitting virtual threads with almost empty tasks Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8375130: [BACKOUT] Scalability issue when submitting virtual threads with almost empty tasks Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8375130: [BACKOUT] Scalability issue when submitting virtual threads with almost empty tasks Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8375130: [BACKOUT] Scalability issue when submitting virtual threads with almost empty tasks Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8375130: [BACKOUT] Scalability issue when submitting virtual threads with almost empty tasks Alan Bateman
  • Integrated: 8375130: [BACKOUT] Scalability issue when submitting virtual threads with almost empty tasks Viktor Klang
• Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v27] Jatin Bhateja
• RFR: 8379035: (tz) Update Timezone Data to 2026a Johny Jose
  • Re: RFR: 8379035: (tz) Update Timezone Data to 2026a Sean Coffey
  • Re: RFR: 8379035: (tz) Update Timezone Data to 2026a Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8379035: (tz) Update Timezone Data to 2026a duke
  • Integrated: 8379035: (tz) Update Timezone Data to 2026a Johny Jose
• RFR: 8379345: jpackage: Fix issues in tests to improve their flexibility Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8379345: jpackage: Fix issues in tests to improve their flexibility [v2] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8379345: jpackage: Fix issues in tests to improve their flexibility [v2] Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8379345: jpackage: Fix issues in tests to improve their flexibility Alexey Semenyuk
  • Integrated: 8379345: jpackage: Fix issues in tests to improve their flexibility Alexey Semenyuk
• RFR: 8379348: jpackage will use wrong arch suffix for RPM bundle when running on Debian Linux Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8379348: jpackage will use wrong arch suffix for RPM bundle when running on Debian Linux Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8379348: jpackage will use wrong arch suffix for RPM bundle when running on Debian Linux [v2] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8379348: jpackage will use wrong arch suffix for RPM bundle when running on Debian Linux [v2] Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8379348: jpackage will use wrong arch suffix for RPM bundle when running on Debian Linux [v2] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8379348: jpackage will use wrong arch suffix for RPM bundle when running on Debian Linux [v2] Alexander Matveev
  • Integrated: 8379348: jpackage will use wrong arch suffix for RPM bundle when running on Debian Linux Alexey Semenyuk
• RFR: 8379341: jpackage: consolidate modular app tests Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8379341: jpackage: consolidate modular app tests Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8379341: jpackage: consolidate modular app tests [v2] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8379341: jpackage: consolidate modular app tests [v2] Alexander Matveev
  • Integrated: 8379341: jpackage: consolidate modular app tests Alexey Semenyuk
• RFR: 8379344: Compact the Unicode/CLDR version tables Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8379344: Compact the Unicode/CLDR version tables Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8379344: Compact the Unicode/CLDR version tables Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8379344: Compact the Unicode/CLDR version tables Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8379344: Compact the Unicode/CLDR version tables Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8379344: Compact the Unicode/CLDR version tables Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8379344: Compact the Unicode/CLDR version tables Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8379344: Compact the Unicode/CLDR version tables Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8379344: Compact the Unicode/CLDR version tables Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8379344: Compact the Unicode/CLDR version tables Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8379344: Compact the Unicode/CLDR version tables Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8379344: Compact the Unicode/CLDR version tables [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8379344: Compact the Unicode/CLDR version tables [v3] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8379344: Compact the Unicode/CLDR version tables [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8379344: Compact the Unicode/CLDR version tables [v3] Naoto Sato
  • Integrated: 8379344: Compact the Unicode/CLDR version tables Naoto Sato
• Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v50] Doug Lea
• Re: RFR: 8367603: Optimize exact division in BigDecimal [v25] fabioromano1
• RFR: 8379337: Deprecate Modifier.toString Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8379337: Deprecate Modifier.toString ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8379337: Deprecate Modifier.toString Marcono1234
  • Re: RFR: 8379337: Deprecate Modifier.toString Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8379337: Deprecate Modifier.toString Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8379337: Deprecate Modifier.toString [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8379337: Deprecate Modifier.toString [v2] Marcono1234
  • Re: RFR: 8379337: Deprecate Modifier.toString [v3] Chen Liang
• RFR: 8379334: jpackage: fix bug in DottedVersion.greedy() function Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8379334: jpackage: fix bug in DottedVersion.greedy() function Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8379334: jpackage: fix bug in DottedVersion.greedy() function Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8379334: jpackage: fix bug in DottedVersion.greedy() function Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8379334: jpackage: fix bug in DottedVersion.greedy() function Alexander Matveev
  • Integrated: 8379334: jpackage: fix bug in DottedVersion.greedy() function Alexey Semenyuk
• RFR: 8379331: Remove modular transition support settings from TEST.ROOT files Christian Stein
  • Re: RFR: 8379331: Remove modular transition support settings from TEST.ROOT files Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8379331: Remove modular transition support settings from TEST.ROOT files Alan Bateman
  • Integrated: 8379331: Remove modular transition support settings from TEST.ROOT files Christian Stein
  • Re: RFR: 8379331: Remove modular transition support settings from TEST.ROOT files Christian Stein
• RFR: 8379326: Use JUnit in lib-test/jdk tests, here MethodTemplateTest Christian Stein
  • Re: RFR: 8379326: Use JUnit in lib-test/jdk tests, here MethodTemplateTest Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8379326: Use JUnit in lib-test/jdk tests, here MethodTemplateTest Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8379326: Use JUnit in lib-test/jdk tests, here MethodTemplateTest Christian Stein
  • Integrated: 8379326: Use JUnit in lib-test/jdk tests, here MethodTemplateTest Christian Stein
• Re: RFR: 8352171: Arrays.hashCode for sub-range of byte array API addition Zihao Lin
• Re: RFR: 8352171: Arrays.hashCode for sub-range of byte array API addition [v6] Zihao Lin
  • Re: RFR: 8352171: Arrays.hashCode for sub-range of byte array API addition [v6] Roger Riggs
• Withdrawn: 8373344: Add support for min/max reduction operations for Float16 duke
• RFR: 8378559: Add setting of captured states like errno Paul Hübner
  • Re: RFR: 8378559: Add setting of captured states like errno Paul Hübner
  • Re: RFR: 8378559: Add setting of captured states like errno Martin Doerr
  • Re: RFR: 8378559: Add setting of captured states like errno Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8378559: Add setting of captured states like errno Paul Hübner
  • Re: RFR: 8378559: Add setting of captured states like errno [v2] Paul Hübner
  • Re: RFR: 8378559: Add setting of captured states like errno [v2] Feilong Jiang
  • Re: RFR: 8378559: Add setting of captured states like errno [v2] Fei Yang
  • Re: RFR: 8378559: Add setting of captured states like errno [v2] Paul Hübner
  • Re: RFR: 8378559: Add setting of captured states like errno [v2] Paul Hübner
  • Re: RFR: 8378559: Add setting of captured states like errno [v2] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8378559: Add setting of captured states like errno [v2] Fredrik Bredberg
  • Re: RFR: 8378559: Add setting of captured states like errno [v2] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8378559: Add setting of captured states like errno [v2] Paul Hübner

• Earlier messages
• Later messages