On Fri, 26 May 2023 15:30:29 GMT, Roger Riggs <rri...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Yes, I used them for testing, but left them in, because it would be 
>> convenient to have them around for field tuning and diagnostics. This would 
>> require a CSR, right?
>
> I don't think there is a strong case for adding the system properties. They 
> just add to the surface area that has to be maintained and add very little 
> value except in very rare cases.  If someone needs very special treatment 
> they can build it outside of UUID and use the new UUID(long, long) 
> constructor.

That sounds okay to me. It simplifies the whole thing and does not require me 
to implement more test and have a CSR discussion about the options too :) 
Removed in the new commit.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14135#discussion_r1207103570

Reply via email to