> Also fixed the bug with NPE in `IndirectVarHandle::isAccessModeSupported`.
> 
> A few implementation-detail methods in VarHandle are now documented with the 
> implied constraints to avoid subtle problems in the future. Changed 
> `IndirectVarHandle` to call `asDirect` lazily to accomodate the lazy 
> VarHandle changes. Also changed VarHandleBaseTest to report the whole 
> incorrect type of exception caught than swallow it and leaving only a message.
> 
> Current problems:
> - [ ] The lazy var handle is quite slow on the first invocation.
>    - As seen in the benchmark, users can first call 
> `Lookup::ensureInitialized` to create an eager handle.
>    - After that, the lazy handle has a performance on par with the regular 
> var handle.
> - [ ] The class-loading-based test is not in a unit test
>    - The test frameworks don't seem to offer fine-grained control for 
> class-loading detection or reliable unloading
> 
> 
> Benchmark                                            Mode  Cnt       Score    
>     Error  Units
> VarHandleLazyStaticInvocation.initializedInvocation  avgt   30  12.668 ± 
> 0.069  ns/op
> VarHandleLazyStaticInvocation.lazyInvocation         avgt   30  12.683 ± 
> 0.069  ns/op
> 
> 
> Benchmark                                            Mode  Cnt     Score     
> Error  Units
> LazyStaticColdStart.methodHandleCreateEager            ss   10    50.980 ±   
> 9.454  us/op
> LazyStaticColdStart.methodHandleCreateLazy             ss   10    24.350 ±   
> 6.701  us/op
> LazyStaticColdStart.methodHandleInitializeCallEager    ss   10    65.140 ±   
> 7.552  us/op
> LazyStaticColdStart.methodHandleInitializeCallLazy     ss   10   118.360 ±  
> 20.320  us/op
> LazyStaticColdStart.varHandleCreateEager               ss   10    49.500 ±   
> 4.277  us/op
> LazyStaticColdStart.varHandleCreateLazy                ss   10    26.690 ±   
> 5.157  us/op
> LazyStaticColdStart.varHandleInitializeCallEager       ss   10    87.930 ±  
> 12.643  us/op
> LazyStaticColdStart.varHandleInitializeCallLazy        ss   10  1057.120 ± 
> 189.810  us/op

Chen Liang has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge 
or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in 
by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 13 additional commits since the 
last revision:

 - Fix withBehavior and test
 - Merge branch 'master' into lazy-static-varhandle
 - Compute base and offset right after linking, simplify code
 - Merge branch 'master' into lazy-static-varhandle
 - Fix exact swap
   
   Co-authored-by: Mandy Chung <mandy.ch...@oracle.com>
 - Remove export for removed package
 - Merge branch 'master' into lazy-static-varhandle
 - Test the creation performance of handles, lazy one indeed better
 - Merge branch 'master' into lazy-static-varhandle
 - copyright year
 - ... and 3 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/dd539201...e21733c1

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13821/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13821/files/27e18b7c..e21733c1

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=13821&range=05
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=13821&range=04-05

  Stats: 7044 lines in 133 files changed: 5823 ins; 774 del; 447 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13821.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/13821/head:pull/13821

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13821

Reply via email to