On Fri, 23 Jun 2023 17:25:00 GMT, Joe Darcy <da...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Correct misstatement that the Class object for a primitive type can only be >> be access via fields like java.lang.Integer.TYPE. > > Joe Darcy has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge > or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in > by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains five additional commits since > the last revision: > > - Respond to review feedback. > - Respond to review feedback. > - Merge branch 'master' into JDK-8310267 > - Fix whitespace. > - JDK-8310267: Javadoc for Class#isPrimitive() is incorrect regarding Class > objects for primitives src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/Class.java line 823: > 821: * > 822: * @apiNote > 823: * A {@code Class} object represented a primitive type can be Not a native speaker, but "representED" not "representING"? ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14574#discussion_r1240107268