On Fri, 23 Jun 2023 17:25:00 GMT, Joe Darcy <da...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Correct misstatement that the Class object for a primitive type can only be
>> be access via fields like java.lang.Integer.TYPE.
>
> Joe Darcy has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge
> or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in
> by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains five additional commits since
> the last revision:
>
> - Respond to review feedback.
> - Respond to review feedback.
> - Merge branch 'master' into JDK-8310267
> - Fix whitespace.
> - JDK-8310267: Javadoc for Class#isPrimitive() is incorrect regarding Class
> objects for primitives
src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/Class.java line 823:
> 821: *
> 822: * @apiNote
> 823: * A {@code Class} object represented a primitive type can be
Not a native speaker, but "representED" not "representING"?
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14574#discussion_r1240107268
