On Sat, 1 Jul 2023 03:06:31 GMT, Chen Liang <li...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>>  >> >> it's enabled > >> > @wenshao I have made my suggestions into a patch for you: >> > [wenshao#1](https://github.com/wenshao/jdk/pull/1) Feel free to review. >> >> your version performance is a bit worse, if i can't find the reason, I will >> restore the previous version > > Can you post the benchmark results? And do you have like a baseline for the > benchmarks, as there may be other factors that affect performance from run to > run? > > Also, my fault for actions: can you go to your actions tab and enable actions > for your fork like this? > <img width="1267" alt="image" > src="https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/assets/7806504/d049d88e-e4fc-4d35-b2a4-87fbfe82dbd5";> @liach ## MacBookPro M1 Pro * Update 02 current version [76dba964](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14745/files/76dba9649a530a2f21574f3dff1aa55a6ebe8888) Benchmark (size) Mode Cnt Score Error Units UUIDBench.toString 20000 thrpt 15 104.262 ± 2.199 ops/us * Update 01 your version [425559f6](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14745/files/425559f65a3e5f72323abdadbbf9df426e196d9b) Benchmark (size) Mode Cnt Score Error Units UUIDBench.toString 20000 thrpt 15 81.622 ± 0.194 ops/us ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14745#issuecomment-1615435719
