On Thu, 7 Sep 2023 13:51:31 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev <sh...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Similar to other issues in the same area. I have no PPC32 machine to test >> the build on, but this matches other fixes for other architectures >> (https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/83c096d6e20cd6e1164bc666df1be197a10431eb) >> after this fix the PPC32 Zero build completes fine. > > Aleksey Shipilev has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a > merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes > brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains three additional > commits since the last revision: > > - Switch to PPC32 > - Merge branch 'master' into JDK-8315578-ppc-builds > - Fix Yeah, so as I see from GHA testing: STARTED ArchTest::checkParams '[8] ppc, PPC32, 32, BIG_ENDIAN, false' java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: No enum constant jdk.internal.util.Architecture.PPC at java.base/java.lang.Enum.valueOf(Enum.java:293) at java.base/jdk.internal.util.Architecture.valueOf(Architecture.java:39) at java.base/jdk.internal.util.Architecture.lookupByName(Architecture.java:99) at ArchTest.checkParams(ArchTest.java:120) at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DirectMethodHandleAccessor.invoke(DirectMethodHandleAccessor.java:103) at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:580) The test would verify that enum names are consistent with `os.arch`. Which would be `ppc`, based on build system pick. Therefore, we cannot do PPC32. I reverted the previous commit... ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15556#issuecomment-1710435235
