core-libs-dev  

Messages by Thread

• Re: RFR: 8303762: Optimize vector slice operation with constant index using VPALIGNR instruction [v8] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8303762: Optimize vector slice operation with constant index using VPALIGNR instruction [v8] Eric Fang
  • Re: RFR: 8303762: Optimize vector slice operation with constant index using VPALIGNR instruction [v8] Jatin Bhateja
• Re: RFR: 8303762: Optimize vector slice operation with constant index using VPALIGNR instruction [v9] Jatin Bhateja
• Re: RFR: 8349452: Fix performance regression for Arrays.fill() with AVX512 [v11] Srinivas Vamsi Parasa
• Re: RFR: 8349452: Fix performance regression for Arrays.fill() with AVX512 [v13] Srinivas Vamsi Parasa
  • Re: RFR: 8349452: Fix performance regression for Arrays.fill() with AVX512 [v13] Srinivas Vamsi Parasa
  • Re: RFR: 8349452: Fix performance regression for Arrays.fill() with AVX512 [v13] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8349452: Fix performance regression for Arrays.fill() with AVX512 [v13] Srinivas Vamsi Parasa
  • Re: RFR: 8349452: Fix performance regression for Arrays.fill() with AVX512 [v13] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8349452: Fix performance regression for Arrays.fill() with AVX512 [v13] Sandhya Viswanathan
  • Re: RFR: 8349452: Fix performance regression for Arrays.fill() with AVX512 [v13] Derek White
  • Re: RFR: 8349452: Fix performance regression for Arrays.fill() with AVX512 [v13] Srinivas Vamsi Parasa
  • Re: RFR: 8349452: Fix performance regression for Arrays.fill() with AVX512 [v13] Srinivas Vamsi Parasa
  • Re: RFR: 8349452: Fix performance regression for Arrays.fill() with AVX512 [v13] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8349452: Fix performance regression for Arrays.fill() with AVX512 [v13] Sandhya Viswanathan
• Re: RFR: 8349452: Fix performance regression for Arrays.fill() with AVX512 [v12] Srinivas Vamsi Parasa
• RFD: Replace class java.lang.Shutdown.Lock with Object? Eirik Bjørsnøs
  • Re: RFD: Replace class java.lang.Shutdown.Lock with Object? Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFD: Replace class java.lang.Shutdown.Lock with Object? David Holmes
  • Re: RFD: Replace class java.lang.Shutdown.Lock with Object? Eirik Bjørsnøs
  • Re: RFD: Replace class java.lang.Shutdown.Lock with Object? David Holmes
  • Re: RFD: Replace class java.lang.Shutdown.Lock with Object? Eirik Bjørsnøs
  • Re: RFD: Replace class java.lang.Shutdown.Lock with Object? Chen Liang
  • Re: RFD: Replace class java.lang.Shutdown.Lock with Object? Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFD: Replace class java.lang.Shutdown.Lock with Object? Eirik Bjørsnøs
  • Re: RFD: Replace class java.lang.Shutdown.Lock with Object? Glavo
  • Re: RFD: Replace class java.lang.Shutdown.Lock with Object? Eirik Bjørsnøs
• [jdk26] RFR: 8360271: String.indexOf intrinsics fail with +EnableX86ECoreOpts and -CompactStrings Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: [jdk26] RFR: 8360271: String.indexOf intrinsics fail with +EnableX86ECoreOpts and -CompactStrings Manuel Hässig
  • Re: [jdk26] RFR: 8360271: String.indexOf intrinsics fail with +EnableX86ECoreOpts and -CompactStrings Sandhya Viswanathan
  • Re: [jdk26] RFR: 8360271: String.indexOf intrinsics fail with +EnableX86ECoreOpts and -CompactStrings Tobias Hartmann
  • [jdk26] Integrated: 8360271: String.indexOf intrinsics fail with +EnableX86ECoreOpts and -CompactStrings Tobias Hartmann
• [jdk26] RFR: 8372978: [VectorAPI] Fix incorrect identity values in UMIN/UMAX reductions Eric Fang
  • Re: [jdk26] RFR: 8372978: [VectorAPI] Fix incorrect identity values in UMIN/UMAX reductions Eric Fang
  • [jdk26] Withdrawn: 8372978: [VectorAPI] Fix incorrect identity values in UMIN/UMAX reductions Eric Fang
• RFR: 8357404: jpackage should attempt to get a package version from the JDK's release file if the --version option is not specified Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8357404: jpackage should attempt to get a package version from the JDK's release file if the --version option is not specified Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8357404: jpackage should attempt to get a package version from the JDK's release file if the --version option is not specified [v2] Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8357404: jpackage should attempt to get a package version from the JDK's release file if the --version option is not specified [v2] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8357404: jpackage should attempt to get a package version from the JDK's release file if the --version option is not specified [v2] Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8357404: jpackage should attempt to get a package version from the JDK's release file if the --version option is not specified [v2] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8357404: jpackage should attempt to get a package version from the JDK's release file if the --version option is not specified [v2] Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8357404: jpackage should attempt to get a package version from the JDK's release file if the --version option is not specified [v2] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8357404: jpackage should attempt to get a package version from the JDK's release file if the --version option is not specified [v2] Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8357404: jpackage should attempt to get a package version from the JDK's release file if the --version option is not specified [v2] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8357404: jpackage should attempt to get a package version from the JDK's release file if the --version option is not specified [v2] Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8357404: jpackage should attempt to get a package version from the JDK's release file if the --version option is not specified [v2] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8357404: jpackage should attempt to get a package version from the JDK's release file if the --version option is not specified [v2] Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8357404: jpackage should attempt to get a package version from the JDK's release file if the --version option is not specified [v2] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8357404: jpackage should attempt to get a package version from the JDK's release file if the --version option is not specified [v2] Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8357404: jpackage should attempt to get a package version from the JDK's release file if the --version option is not specified [v3] Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8357404: jpackage should attempt to get a package version from the JDK's release file if the --version option is not specified [v3] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8357404: jpackage should attempt to get a package version from the JDK's release file if the --version option is not specified [v4] Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8357404: jpackage should attempt to get a package version from the JDK's release file if the --version option is not specified [v5] Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8357404: jpackage should attempt to get a package version from the JDK's release file if the --version option is not specified [v5] Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8357404: jpackage should attempt to get a package version from the JDK's release file if the --version option is not specified [v5] Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8357404: jpackage should attempt to get a package version from the JDK's release file if the --version option is not specified [v6] Alexander Matveev
• RFR: 8373120: Virtual thread stuck in BLOCKED state Patricio Chilano Mateo
  • Re: RFR: 8373120: Virtual thread stuck in BLOCKED state David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8373120: Virtual thread stuck in BLOCKED state Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8373120: Virtual thread stuck in BLOCKED state Patricio Chilano Mateo
  • Re: RFR: 8373120: Virtual thread stuck in BLOCKED state Patricio Chilano Mateo
  • Re: RFR: 8373120: Virtual thread stuck in BLOCKED state Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8373120: Virtual thread stuck in BLOCKED state [v2] Patricio Chilano Mateo
  • Re: RFR: 8373120: Virtual thread stuck in BLOCKED state [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8373120: Virtual thread stuck in BLOCKED state [v3] Patricio Chilano Mateo
  • Re: RFR: 8373120: Virtual thread stuck in BLOCKED state [v2] Patricio Chilano Mateo
  • Re: RFR: 8373120: Virtual thread stuck in BLOCKED state [v2] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8373120: Virtual thread stuck in BLOCKED state [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8373120: Virtual thread stuck in BLOCKED state [v3] Patricio Chilano Mateo
  • Re: RFR: 8373120: Virtual thread stuck in BLOCKED state [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Integrated: 8373120: Virtual thread stuck in BLOCKED state Patricio Chilano Mateo
• RFR: 8375342: jdk/javadoc/doccheck/checks/jdkCheckHtml.java failed with duplicate anchors Roger Calnan
  • Re: RFR: 8375342: jdk/javadoc/doccheck/checks/jdkCheckHtml.java failed with duplicate anchors Iris Clark
  • Re: RFR: 8375342: jdk/javadoc/doccheck/checks/jdkCheckHtml.java failed with duplicate anchors Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8375342: jdk/javadoc/doccheck/checks/jdkCheckHtml.java failed with duplicate anchors duke
  • Integrated: 8375342: jdk/javadoc/doccheck/checks/jdkCheckHtml.java failed with duplicate anchors Roger Calnan
• Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v12] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v12] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v12] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v12] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v12] Emanuel Peter
• RFR: 8375242: Improve jpackage signing coverage Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8375242: Improve jpackage signing coverage Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8375242: [macos] Improve jpackage signing coverage Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8375242: [macos] Improve jpackage signing coverage Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8375242: [macos] Improve jpackage signing coverage [v3] Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8375242: [macos] Improve jpackage signing coverage Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8375242: [macos] Improve jpackage signing coverage [v3] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8375242: [macos] Improve jpackage signing coverage [v2] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8375242: [macos] Improve jpackage signing coverage [v3] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8375242: [macos] Improve jpackage signing coverage [v3] Alexander Matveev
  • Integrated: 8375242: [macos] Improve jpackage signing coverage Alexey Semenyuk
• RFR: 8360271: String.indexOf intrinsics fail with +EnableX86ECoreOpts and -CompactStrings Volodymyr Paprotski
  • Re: RFR: 8360271: String.indexOf intrinsics fail with +EnableX86ECoreOpts and -CompactStrings Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: RFR: 8360271: String.indexOf intrinsics fail with +EnableX86ECoreOpts and -CompactStrings Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8360271: String.indexOf intrinsics fail with +EnableX86ECoreOpts and -CompactStrings Sandhya Viswanathan
  • Integrated: 8360271: String.indexOf intrinsics fail with +EnableX86ECoreOpts and -CompactStrings Volodymyr Paprotski
  • Re: RFR: 8360271: String.indexOf intrinsics fail with +EnableX86ECoreOpts and -CompactStrings Volodymyr Paprotski
• RFR: 8375364: Some jpackage signing tests fail after JDK-8375240 Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8375364: Some jpackage signing tests fail after JDK-8375240 [v2] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8375364: Some jpackage signing tests fail after JDK-8375240 [v2] Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8375364: Some jpackage signing tests fail after JDK-8375240 Alexey Semenyuk
  • Integrated: 8375364: [macos] Some jpackage signing tests fail after JDK-8375240 Alexey Semenyuk
• [jdk26] RFR: 8373105: Test tools/jpackage/share/AsyncTest.java failed: problem running hdiutil Alexander Matveev
  • Re: [jdk26] RFR: 8373105: Test tools/jpackage/share/AsyncTest.java failed: problem running hdiutil Alexander Matveev
  • Re: [jdk26] RFR: 8373105: Test tools/jpackage/share/AsyncTest.java failed: problem running hdiutil Alexey Semenyuk
  • [jdk26] Integrated: 8373105: Test tools/jpackage/share/AsyncTest.java failed: problem running hdiutil Alexander Matveev
• [jdk26] RFR: 8373448: jpackage: StackOverflowError when processing a very long argument Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: [jdk26] RFR: 8373448: jpackage: StackOverflowError when processing a very long argument Alexander Matveev
  • Re: [jdk26] RFR: 8373448: jpackage: StackOverflowError when processing a very long argument Alexey Semenyuk
  • [jdk26] Integrated: 8373448: jpackage: StackOverflowError when processing a very long argument Alexey Semenyuk
• RFR: 8373001: LauncherFromOptions.create() not properly handling FileAssociationNoExtensionsException. Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8373001: LauncherFromOptions.create() not properly handling FileAssociationNoExtensionsException. Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8373001: LauncherFromOptions.create() not properly handling FileAssociationNoExtensionsException. Alexander Matveev
  • Integrated: 8373001: LauncherFromOptions.create() not properly handling FileAssociationNoExtensionsException Alexey Semenyuk
• RFR: 8375323: Improve handling of the "--app-content" and "--input" options in jpackage Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8375323: Improve handling of the "--app-content" and "--input" options in jpackage Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8375323: Improve handling of the "--app-content" and "--input" options in jpackage [v2] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8375323: Improve handling of the "--app-content" and "--input" options in jpackage [v2] Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8375323: Improve handling of the "--app-content" and "--input" options in jpackage [v2] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8375323: Improve handling of the "--app-content" and "--input" options in jpackage [v2] Alexander Matveev
  • Integrated: 8375323: Improve handling of the "--app-content" and "--input" options in jpackage Alexey Semenyuk
• RFR: 8375237: Document existing exceptional behavior of divideUnsigned and remainderUnsigned Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8375237: Document existing exceptional behavior of divideUnsigned and remainderUnsigned Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8375237: Document existing exceptional behavior of divideUnsigned and remainderUnsigned Joe Darcy
  • Integrated: 8375237: Document existing exceptional behavior of divideUnsigned and remainderUnsigned Joe Darcy
• RFR: 8375240: Make bundling progress messages issued by jpackage consistent across platforms Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8375240: Make bundling progress messages issued by jpackage consistent across platforms Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8375240: Make bundling progress messages issued by jpackage consistent across platforms Alexander Matveev
  • Integrated: 8375240: Make bundling progress messages issued by jpackage consistent across platforms Alexey Semenyuk
• RFR: 8356684: jpackage error messages are not helpful Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8356684: jpackage error messages are not helpful Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8356684: jpackage error messages are not helpful [v2] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8356684: jpackage error messages are not helpful [v2] Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8356684: jpackage error messages are not helpful [v3] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8356684: jpackage error messages are not helpful [v3] Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8356684: jpackage error messages are not helpful [v4] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8356684: jpackage error messages are not helpful [v4] Alexander Matveev
  • Integrated: 8356684: jpackage error messages are not helpful Alexey Semenyuk
• RFR: 8375231: Refactor util/ServiceLoader tests to use JUnit Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8375231: Refactor util/ServiceLoader tests to use JUnit Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8375231: Refactor util/ServiceLoader tests to use JUnit [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8375231: Refactor util/ServiceLoader tests to use JUnit [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8375231: Refactor util/ServiceLoader tests to use JUnit [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8375231: Refactor util/ServiceLoader tests to use JUnit [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8375231: Refactor util/ServiceLoader tests to use JUnit [v3] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8375231: Refactor util/ServiceLoader tests to use JUnit [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8375231: Refactor util/ServiceLoader tests to use JUnit [v3] Naoto Sato
  • Integrated: 8375231: Refactor util/ServiceLoader tests to use JUnit Justin Lu
• Re: RFR: 8277489: Rewrite JAAS UnixLoginModule with FFM [v8] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8277489: Rewrite JAAS UnixLoginModule with FFM [v8] Weijun Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8277489: Rewrite JAAS UnixLoginModule with FFM [v8] Martin Doerr
• RFR: 8366736: Closed System.out causes child process to hang on Windows Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8366736: Closed System.out causes child process to hang on Windows Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8366736: Closed System.out causes child process to hang on Windows Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8366736: Closed System.out causes child process to hang on Windows [v2] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8366736: Closed System.out causes child process to hang on Windows [v2] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8366736: Closed System.out causes child process to hang on Windows [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8366736: Closed System.out causes child process to hang on Windows [v2] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8366736: Closed System.out causes child process to hang on Windows [v2] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8366736: Closed System.out causes child process to hang on Windows [v2] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8366736: Closed System.out causes child process to hang on Windows [v3] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8366736: Closed System.out causes child process to hang on Windows [v4] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8366736: Closed System.out causes child process to hang on Windows [v5] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8366736: Closed System.out causes child process to hang on Windows [v5] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8366736: Closed System.out causes child process to hang on Windows [v5] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8366736: Closed System.out causes child process to hang on Windows [v5] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8366736: Closed System.out causes child process to hang on Windows [v6] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8366736: Closed System.out causes child process to hang on Windows [v6] Roger Riggs
• RFR: 8375119: SwitchBoostraps.enumSwitch does not throw an NPE when lookup is null in some cases Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: 8375119: SwitchBoostraps.enumSwitch does not throw an NPE when lookup is null in some cases Johannes Döbler
  • Re: RFR: 8375119: SwitchBoostraps.enumSwitch does not throw an NPE when lookup is null in some cases Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: 8375119: SwitchBoostraps.enumSwitch does not throw an NPE when lookup is null in some cases Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8375119: SwitchBoostraps.enumSwitch does not throw an NPE when lookup is null in some cases Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8375119: SwitchBoostraps.enumSwitch does not throw an NPE when lookup is null in some cases Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: 8375119: SwitchBoostraps.enumSwitch does not throw an NPE when lookup is null in some cases Chen Liang
  • Integrated: 8375119: SwitchBoostraps.enumSwitch does not throw an NPE when lookup is null in some cases Jan Lahoda
• [jdk26] RFR: 8375130: [BACKOUT] Scalability issue when submitting virtual threads with almost empty tasks Alan Bateman
  • Re: [jdk26] RFR: 8375130: [BACKOUT] Scalability issue when submitting virtual threads with almost empty tasks Viktor Klang
  • Re: [jdk26] RFR: 8375130: [BACKOUT] Scalability issue when submitting virtual threads with almost empty tasks [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: [jdk26] RFR: 8375130: [BACKOUT] Scalability issue when submitting virtual threads with almost empty tasks [v2] Viktor Klang
  • [jdk26] Integrated: 8375130: [BACKOUT] Scalability issue when submitting virtual threads with almost empty tasks Alan Bateman
• Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v11] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v11] Fei Yang
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v11] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v11] Fei Yang
• Re: RFR: 8370691: Add new Float16Vector type and enable intrinsification of vector operations supported by auto-vectorizer [v10] Jatin Bhateja
• RFR: 8372353: API to compute the byte length of a String encoded in a given Charset Liam Miller-Cushon
  • Re: RFR: 8372353: API to compute the byte length of a String encoded in a given Charset ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8372353: API to compute the byte length of a String encoded in a given Charset Liam Miller-Cushon
  • Re: RFR: 8372353: API to compute the byte length of a String encoded in a given Charset Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8372353: API to compute the byte length of a String encoded in a given Charset [v2] Liam Miller-Cushon
  • Re: RFR: 8372353: API to compute the byte length of a String encoded in a given Charset [v2] Liam Miller-Cushon
  • Re: RFR: 8372353: API to compute the byte length of a String encoded in a given Charset [v2] Liam Miller-Cushon
  • Re: RFR: 8372353: API to compute the byte length of a String encoded in a given Charset [v2] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8372353: API to compute the byte length of a String encoded in a given Charset [v2] Liam Miller-Cushon
  • Re: RFR: 8372353: API to compute the byte length of a String encoded in a given Charset [v2] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8372353: API to compute the byte length of a String encoded in a given Charset [v2] Liam Miller-Cushon

• Earlier messages
• Later messages