On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 14:42:33 GMT, Claes Redestad <redes...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> this place doesn't need off++ > > It was a suggestion, implicitly paired with removing ` + (year < 0 ? 1 : 0)` > from line 2188. The reason for not using off++ is that it can be executed out of order, which may result in better performance. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15658#discussion_r1321781354
