On Wed, 6 Sep 2023 15:55:21 GMT, Tim Prinzing <tprinz...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>>> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8310979 - better exception handling >>> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8310978 - missing code paths for event >>> generation https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8310994 - non-blocking, >>> event for select ops >> >> Do you have a sense yet on events when the channel is configured >> non-blocking? I realise the threshold is 20ms so they are probably not >> recorded today but I wonder if these code paths will eventually include `|| >> !blocking` or if it useful to record data on all socket read/write ops. > >> > https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8310979 - better exception handling >> > https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8310978 - missing code paths for event >> > generation https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8310994 - non-blocking, >> > event for select ops >> >> Do you have a sense yet on events when the channel is configured >> non-blocking? I realise the threshold is 20ms so they are probably not >> recorded today but I wonder if these code paths will eventually include `|| >> !blocking` or if it useful to record data on all socket read/write ops. > > I think it's useful if trying to trace the calls (i.e. set to 0ms). > Apparently the security manager was being used for that by some. > @tprinzing > Your change (at version > [9fa2745](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/9fa2745960aea0bc45642081bac89fb5ef65809e)) > is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer. @tprinzing I don't mind sponsoring but I think it would help if you could sync up the branch and provide a summary on the testing was done. The jdk_net and jdk_nio test groups are in tier2. The jdk_jfr test group is in tier3. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14342#issuecomment-1725248917
