core-libs-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: RFR: 8362376: Use @Stable annotation in Java FDLIBM implementation John R Rose
  • Re: RFR: 8362376: Use @Stable annotation in Java FDLIBM implementation Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8362376: Use @Stable annotation in Java FDLIBM implementation Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8362376: Use @Stable annotation in Java FDLIBM implementation Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8362376: Use @Stable annotation in Java FDLIBM implementation Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8362376: Use @Stable annotation in Java FDLIBM implementation Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8362376: Use @Stable annotation in Java FDLIBM implementation Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8362376: Use @Stable annotation in Java FDLIBM implementation Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8362376: Use @Stable annotation in Java FDLIBM implementation Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8362376: Use @Stable annotation in Java FDLIBM implementation [v2] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8362376: Use @Stable annotation in Java FDLIBM implementation [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8362376: Use @Stable annotation in Java FDLIBM implementation [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8362376: Use @Stable annotation in Java FDLIBM implementation [v2] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8362376: Use @Stable annotation in Java FDLIBM implementation [v3] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8362376: Use @Stable annotation in Java FDLIBM implementation [v3] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8362376: Use @Stable annotation in Java FDLIBM implementation [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8362376: Use @Stable annotation in Java FDLIBM implementation [v3] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8362376: Use @Stable annotation in Java FDLIBM implementation [v3] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8362376: Use @Stable annotation in Java FDLIBM implementation [v3] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8362376: Use @Stable annotation in Java FDLIBM implementation [v3] ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8362376: Use @Stable annotation in Java FDLIBM implementation [v3] Andrey Turbanov
  • Re: RFR: 8362376: Use @Stable annotation in Java FDLIBM implementation [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8362376: Use @Stable annotation in Java FDLIBM implementation [v3] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8362376: Use @Stable annotation in Java FDLIBM implementation [v4] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8362376: Use @Stable annotation in Java FDLIBM implementation [v5] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8362376: Use @Stable annotation in Java FDLIBM implementation [v5] Chen Liang
  • Integrated: 8362376: Use @Stable annotation in Java FDLIBM implementation Joe Darcy
• Re: RFR: 8358880: Performance of parsing with DecimalFormat can be improved [v6] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8358880: Performance of parsing with DecimalFormat can be improved [v6] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8358880: Performance of parsing with DecimalFormat can be improved [v6] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8358880: Performance of parsing with DecimalFormat can be improved [v6] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8358880: Performance of parsing with DecimalFormat can be improved [v6] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8358880: Performance of parsing with DecimalFormat can be improved [v6] duke
  • Re: RFR: 8358880: Performance of parsing with DecimalFormat can be improved [v6] Johannes Graham
• RFR: 8362304: Fix JDWP spec w.r.t. OPAQUE_FRAME and INVALID_SLOT errors Chris Plummer
• [jdk25] RFR: 8361587: AssertionError in File.listFiles() when path is empty and -esa is enabled Brian Burkhalter
  • Re: [jdk25] RFR: 8361587: AssertionError in File.listFiles() when path is empty and -esa is enabled Alan Bateman
  • [jdk25] Integrated: 8361587: AssertionError in File.listFiles() when path is empty and -esa is enabled Brian Burkhalter
• How important is jspawnhelper crash detection? Thomas Stüfe
  • Re: How important is jspawnhelper crash detection? Roger Riggs
  • Re: How important is jspawnhelper crash detection? Thomas Stüfe
  • Re: How important is jspawnhelper crash detection? Thomas Stüfe
• Re: RFR: 8357913: Add `@Stable` to BigInteger and BigDecimal [v4] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8357913: Add `@Stable` to BigInteger and BigDecimal [v4] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8357913: Add `@Stable` to BigInteger and BigDecimal [v4] Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8357913: Add `@Stable` to BigInteger and BigDecimal [v4] Per Minborg
• Integrated: 8358540: Enhance MathUtils in view of FloatingDecimal enhancements Raffaello Giulietti
• RFR: 8361888: [GCC static analyzer] ProcessImpl_md.c Java_java_lang_ProcessImpl_forkAndExec error: use of uninitialized value '*(ChildStuff *)p.mode Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8361888: [GCC static analyzer] ProcessImpl_md.c Java_java_lang_ProcessImpl_forkAndExec error: use of uninitialized value '*(ChildStuff *)p.mode Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8361888: [GCC static analyzer] ProcessImpl_md.c Java_java_lang_ProcessImpl_forkAndExec error: use of uninitialized value '*(ChildStuff *)p.mode SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8361888: [GCC static analyzer] ProcessImpl_md.c Java_java_lang_ProcessImpl_forkAndExec error: use of uninitialized value '*(ChildStuff *)p.mode Matthias Baesken
  • Integrated: 8361888: [GCC static analyzer] ProcessImpl_md.c Java_java_lang_ProcessImpl_forkAndExec error: use of uninitialized value '*(ChildStuff *)p.mode Matthias Baesken
• RFR: 8358530: enhanced Properties#list javadoc cagliostro92
  • Re: RFR: 8358530: enhanced Properties#list javadoc Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8358530: enhanced Properties#list javadoc cagliostro92
  • Re: RFR: 8358530: enhanced Properties#list javadoc Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8358530: Properties#list should warn against non-String values [v2] cagliostro92
  • Re: RFR: 8358530: Properties#list should warn against non-String values [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8358530: Properties#list should warn against non-String values [v3] cagliostro92
  • Re: RFR: 8358530: Properties#list should warn against non-String values [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8358530: Properties#list should warn against non-String values [v2] cagliostro92
  • Re: RFR: 8358530: Properties#list should warn against non-String values [v3] cagliostro92
  • Re: RFR: 8358530: Properties#list should warn against non-String values [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8358530: Properties#list should warn against non-String values [v3] duke
  • Re: RFR: 8358530: Properties#list should warn against non-String values [v3] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8358530: Properties#list should warn against non-String values [v3] cagliostro92
  • Integrated: 8358530: Properties#list should warn against non-String values cagliostro92
• RFR: 8362207: Add more test cases for possible double-rounding in fma Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8362207: Add more test cases for possible double-rounding in fma Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8362207: Add more test cases for possible double-rounding in fma SendaoYan
  • Integrated: 8362207: Add more test cases for possible double-rounding in fma Joe Darcy
• RFR: 8361972: Clarify the condition of System.console() about standard input/output Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8361972: Clarify the condition of System.console() about standard input/output Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8361972: Clarify the condition of System.console() about standard input/output Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8361972: Clarify the condition of System.console() about standard input/output Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8361972: Clarify the condition of System.console() about standard input/output Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8361972: Clarify the condition of System.console() about standard input/output [v3] Stuart Marks
  • Re: RFR: 8361972: Clarify the condition of System.console() about standard input/output [v4] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8361972: Clarify the condition of System.console() about standard input/output [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8361972: Clarify the condition of System.console() about standard input/output [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8361972: Clarify the condition of System.console() about standard input/output [v2] Joe Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8361972: Clarify the condition of System.console() about standard input/output [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8361972: Clarify the condition of System.console() about standard input/output [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8361972: Clarify the condition of System.console() about standard input/output [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8361972: Clarify the condition of System.console() about standard input/output [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8361972: Clarify the condition of System.console() about standard input/output [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8361972: Clarify the condition of System.console() about standard input/output [v3] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8361972: Clarify the condition of System.console() about standard input/output [v4] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8361972: Clarify the condition of System.console() about standard input/output [v4] Stuart Marks
  • Re: RFR: 8361972: Clarify the condition of System.console() about standard input/output [v4] Naoto Sato
  • Integrated: 8361972: Clarify the condition of System.console() about standard input/output Naoto Sato
• RFR: 8362169: Pointer passed to upcall may get wrong scope Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8362169: Pointer passed to upcall may get wrong scope Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Integrated: 8362169: Pointer passed to upcall may get wrong scope Jorn Vernee
• Integrated: 8358627: tools/sincechecker/modules/java.base/JavaBaseCheckSince.java fails with JDK 26 Nizar Benalla
• Re: RFR: 8342382: Implementation of JEP G1: Improve Application Throughput with a More Efficient Write-Barrier [v42] Thomas Schatzl
• Re: RFR: 8359424: Eliminate table lookup in Integer/Long toHexString [v2] Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8359424: Eliminate table lookup in Integer/Long toHexString [v2] Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8359424: Eliminate table lookup in Integer/Long toHexString [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8359424: Eliminate table lookup in Integer/Long toHexString [v2] Shaojin Wen
• RFR: 8360459: UNICODE_CASE and character class with non-ASCII range does not match ASCII char Xueming Shen
  • Re: RFR: 8360459: UNICODE_CASE and character class with non-ASCII range does not match ASCII char Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8360459: UNICODE_CASE and character class with non-ASCII range does not match ASCII char Xueming Shen
  • Re: RFR: 8360459: UNICODE_CASE and character class with non-ASCII range does not match ASCII char [v5] Xueming Shen
  • Re: RFR: 8360459: UNICODE_CASE and character class with non-ASCII range does not match ASCII char [v2] Xueming Shen
  • Re: RFR: 8360459: UNICODE_CASE and character class with non-ASCII range does not match ASCII char [v2] Xueming Shen
  • Re: RFR: 8360459: UNICODE_CASE and character class with non-ASCII range does not match ASCII char [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8360459: UNICODE_CASE and character class with non-ASCII range does not match ASCII char [v2] Xueming Shen
  • Re: RFR: 8360459: UNICODE_CASE and character class with non-ASCII range does not match ASCII char [v3] Xueming Shen
  • Re: RFR: 8360459: UNICODE_CASE and character class with non-ASCII range does not match ASCII char [v3] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8360459: UNICODE_CASE and character class with non-ASCII range does not match ASCII char [v4] Xueming Shen
  • Re: RFR: 8360459: UNICODE_CASE and character class with non-ASCII range does not match ASCII char [v5] Xueming Shen
  • Re: RFR: 8360459: UNICODE_CASE and character class with non-ASCII range does not match ASCII char [v5] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8360459: UNICODE_CASE and character class with non-ASCII range does not match ASCII char [v5] Xueming Shen
  • Re: RFR: 8360459: UNICODE_CASE and character class with non-ASCII range does not match ASCII char [v6] Xueming Shen
  • Re: RFR: 8360459: UNICODE_CASE and character class with non-ASCII range does not match ASCII char [v6] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8360459: UNICODE_CASE and character class with non-ASCII range does not match ASCII char [v6] Xueming Shen
  • Integrated: 8360459: UNICODE_CASE and character class with non-ASCII range does not match ASCII char Xueming Shen
• Withdrawn: 8342382: Implementation of JEP G1: Improve Application Throughput with a More Efficient Write-Barrier duke
• Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v23] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v23] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v23] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v23] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v23] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v23] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v23] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v23] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v23] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v23] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v23] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v23] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v23] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v23] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v23] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v23] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v23] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v23] Hans Boehm
  • Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v23] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v23] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v23] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v23] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v23] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v23] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v23] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v23] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v23] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v23] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v23] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v23] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v23] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v23] Raffaello Giulietti
• Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v22] fabioromano1
• Withdrawn: 8352044: Add --with-import-jvms to configure duke
• RFR: 8361224: [macos] MacSignTest.testMultipleCertificates failed Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8361224: [macos] MacSignTest.testMultipleCertificates failed Alexey Semenyuk
  • Integrated: 8361224: [macos] MacSignTest.testMultipleCertificates failed Alexander Matveev
• Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v21] fabioromano1
• RFR: 8361613: System.console() should only be available for interactive terminal Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8361613: System.console() should only be available for interactive terminal Andrey Turbanov
  • Re: RFR: 8361613: System.console() should only be available for interactive terminal [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8361613: System.console() should only be available for interactive terminal [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8361613: System.console() should only be available for interactive terminal [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8361613: System.console() should only be available for interactive terminal [v3] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8361613: System.console() should only be available for interactive terminal [v3] Jan Lahoda
  • Re: RFR: 8361613: System.console() should only be available for interactive terminal [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8361613: System.console() should only be available for interactive terminal [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8361613: System.console() should only be available for interactive terminal [v3] Xueming Shen
  • Re: RFR: 8361613: System.console() should only be available for interactive terminal [v3] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8361613: System.console() should only be available for interactive terminal [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8361613: System.console() should only be available for interactive terminal [v3] Stuart Marks
  • Re: RFR: 8361613: System.console() should only be available for interactive terminal [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8361613: System.console() should only be available for interactive terminal [v3] ecki
  • Re: RFR: 8361613: System.console() should only be available for interactive terminal [v3] Stuart Marks
  • Re: RFR: 8361613: System.console() should only be available for interactive terminal [v3] Naoto Sato
  • Integrated: 8361613: System.console() should only be available for interactive terminal Naoto Sato
• Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v20] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v20] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v20] Hans Boehm
• Re: RFR: 8358627: tools/sincechecker/modules/java.base/JavaBaseCheckSince.java fails with JDK 26 [v2] Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8358627: tools/sincechecker/modules/java.base/JavaBaseCheckSince.java fails with JDK 26 [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8358627: tools/sincechecker/modules/java.base/JavaBaseCheckSince.java fails with JDK 26 [v2] Nizar Benalla
• ClassLoader Leak via Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor(...) Chris Dennis
  • Re: ClassLoader Leak via Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor(...) Viktor Klang
  • Re: ClassLoader Leak via Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor(...) Alan Bateman
  • Re: ClassLoader Leak via Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor(...) Chris Dennis
  • Re: ClassLoader Leak via Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor(...) Chris Dennis
  • Re: ClassLoader Leak via Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor(...) Jaikiran Pai
• Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v19] fabioromano1
  • Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v19] Hans Boehm
• RFR: 8361959: [GCC static analyzer] java_props_md.c leak of 'temp' variable is reported Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8361959: [GCC static analyzer] java_props_md.c leak of 'temp' variable is reported Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8361959: [GCC static analyzer] java_props_md.c leak of 'temp' variable is reported Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8361959: [GCC static analyzer] java_props_md.c leak of 'temp' variable is reported [v2] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8361959: [GCC static analyzer] java_props_md.c leak of 'temp' variable is reported [v2] Kim Barrett
  • Re: RFR: 8361959: [GCC static analyzer] java_props_md.c leak of 'temp' variable is reported [v2] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8361959: [GCC static analyzer] java_props_md.c leak of 'temp' variable is reported [v2] Aleksey Shipilev
  • Re: RFR: 8361959: [GCC static analyzer] java_props_md.c leak of 'temp' variable is reported [v2] Matthias Baesken
  • Integrated: 8361959: [GCC static analyzer] java_props_md.c leak of 'temp' variable is reported Matthias Baesken
• Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v18] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v18] fabioromano1

• Earlier messages
• Later messages