On Sun, 24 Sep 2023 20:27:53 GMT, 温绍锦 <d...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> @cl4es made performance optimizations for the simple specifiers of 
>> String.format in PR https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/2830. Based on the 
>> same idea, I continued to make improvements. I made patterns like %2d %02d 
>> also be optimized.
>> 
>> The following are the test results based on MacBookPro M1 Pro: 
>> 
>> 
>> -Benchmark                          Mode  Cnt     Score     Error  Units
>> -StringFormat.complexFormat         avgt   15  1862.233 ? 217.479  ns/op
>> -StringFormat.int02Format           avgt   15   312.491 ?  26.021  ns/op
>> -StringFormat.intFormat             avgt   15    84.432 ?   4.145  ns/op
>> -StringFormat.longFormat            avgt   15    87.330 ?   6.111  ns/op
>> -StringFormat.stringFormat          avgt   15    63.985 ?  11.366  ns/op
>> -StringFormat.stringIntFormat       avgt   15    87.422 ?   0.147  ns/op
>> -StringFormat.widthStringFormat     avgt   15   250.740 ?  32.639  ns/op
>> -StringFormat.widthStringIntFormat  avgt   15   312.474 ?  16.309  ns/op
>> 
>> +Benchmark                          Mode  Cnt    Score    Error  Units
>> +StringFormat.complexFormat         avgt   15  740.626 ? 66.671  ns/op 
>> (+151.45)
>> +StringFormat.int02Format           avgt   15  131.049 ?  0.432  ns/op 
>> (+138.46)
>> +StringFormat.intFormat             avgt   15   67.229 ?  4.155  ns/op 
>> (+25.59)
>> +StringFormat.longFormat            avgt   15   66.444 ?  0.614  ns/op 
>> (+31.44)
>> +StringFormat.stringFormat          avgt   15   62.619 ?  4.652  ns/op 
>> (+2.19)
>> +StringFormat.stringIntFormat       avgt   15   89.606 ? 13.966  ns/op 
>> (-2.44)
>> +StringFormat.widthStringFormat     avgt   15   52.462 ? 15.649  ns/op 
>> (+377.95)
>> +StringFormat.widthStringIntFormat  avgt   15  101.814 ?  3.147  ns/op 
>> (+206.91)
>
> 温绍锦 has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit 
> since the last revision:
> 
>   fix logic error

I think this is shaping up nicely. Some unused code, then I think we can move 
ahead.

The new `FormatSpecifierParser` utility class adds a bit of boilerplate for 
something that could be a static utility: https://github.com/wenshao/jdk/pull/6 
- but perhaps splitting it up a bit more helps JIT inlining further. I can take 
this on as a follow-up RFE if you prefer.

src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/Formatter.java line 3140:

> 3138:         }
> 3139: 
> 3140:         FormatSpecifier(char conv, int flag, int width, int precision) {

This appears to be unused.

-------------

Changes requested by redestad (Reviewer).

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15776#pullrequestreview-1641781843
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15776#discussion_r1335667901

Reply via email to