On Thu, 19 Oct 2023 11:38:57 GMT, Shaojin Wen <d...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> In addition to #16244, will you submit a PR for this? Once both #16244 and this has been integrated I want to revisit this. The effect of changing `getBytes(byte[], int, byte)` might have disappeared with #16244 since it better guarantees the JIT will constant fold the prefixes thoroughly. We've observed related issues with System.arraycopy, however, see https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8295496 - so I want to evaluate a few different options here, time allowing. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16006#issuecomment-1770752234
