Please review this PR which adjusts the specification of `DateFormat.Field::getCalendarField` to conform to the implementation.
`getCalendarField()` claims that it will return -1 if there is no corresponding `Calendar` constant. Although the built-in DateFormat.Fields with no associated `Calendar` constant are created with a `calendarField` equal to -1, a subclass can create a DateFormat.Field with no associated `Calendar` constant with `calendarField` equal to anything. The specification of `getCalendarField()` should be adjusted to reflect this. That is, a separate implementation may or may not return -1 if there is no associated `Calendar` constant. ------------- Commit messages: - this implementation -> the default implementation - init Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16279/files Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=16279&range=00 Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-7061097 Stats: 6 lines in 1 file changed: 3 ins; 0 del; 3 mod Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16279.diff Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/16279/head:pull/16279 PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16279
