On Sun, 8 Oct 2023 17:01:37 GMT, Joe Darcy <da...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> @liach , thank you for working on this fix. I've given the changes an 
>> initial skim, but will need to do a more thorough review before approving or 
>> offering suggestions for changes. My top priority for the next few weeks 
>> will be JDK 21 CSRs so it may take a while for me to circle back to this PR.
>
>> @jddarcy Joe, can you take a look at this patch where annotation handling on 
>> parameters now uses available `MethodParameters` attribute to match from 
>> explicit formal parameter indices to implicit formal parameter indices?
> 
> @liach sorry for the delays.
> 
> I'll be attending to some other matters in the immediate future; please ping 
> me again in a few weeks if I don't reply first.

Hello Joe @jddarcy, is there anything that I need to do to move this patch 
forward? Should I file a CSR for the behavior change to 
`getAnnotatedParameterTypes()` and `getParameters()[i].getAnnotatedType()` due 
to this bugfix, as it now annotates correctly?

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13664#issuecomment-1793946590

Reply via email to