On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 19:26:26 GMT, Mandy Chung <mch...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> `jdk.lambda.vm.InterfaceAccessFlagsTest` uses `ClassToInterfaceConverter` to > mechanically convert a classfile for a Class into an in-memory class > representation of an equivalent Interface. `testPrivateMethodCall` tests to > invoke a private method. Before nestmates, invoking a private class method > and a private interface method both use `Invokespecial`. With the nestmate > changes, the class uses `invokevirtual` but the interface must use > `invokeinterface` but this conversion is not handled by the existing > `ClassToInterfaceConverter`. > > This fix converts `ClassToInterfaceConverter` to use the Class-File API to > properly convert a classfile from a class to an interface including method > invocation from `invokevirtual` to `invokeinterface`. The old custom > bytecode manipulation code can be dropped. test/jdk/jdk/lambda/separate/ClassToInterfaceConverter.java line 39: > 37: > 38: private byte[] convertToInterface(ClassModel classModel) { > 39: return Classfile.of().build(classModel.thisClass().asSymbol(), You can use `transform` to transform a class instead of `build`. test/jdk/jdk/lambda/separate/ClassToInterfaceConverter.java line 43: > 41: for (ClassElement ce : classModel) { > 42: if (ce instanceof AccessFlags accessFlags) { > 43: classBuilder.withFlags(0x0601); // > ACC_INTERFACE | ACC_ABSTRACT | ACC_PUBLIC); We can just use `withFlags(Classfile.ACC_INTERFACE | Classfile.ACC_ABSTRACT | Classfile.ACC_PUBLIC)` as it's a constant expression and inlined by javac. And the `accessFlags` variable above appears unused. test/jdk/jdk/lambda/separate/ClassToInterfaceConverter.java line 52: > 50: // by other methods in the interface, > convert it to InterfaceMethodref and > 51: // if opcode is invokevirtual, convert it to > invokeinterface > 52: > classBuilder.withMethod(mm.methodName().stringValue(), Same remark, use `classBuilder.transformMethod(mm, MethodTransform.transformCode((codeBuilder, e) -> {}))` ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16526#discussion_r1384280905 PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16526#discussion_r1384279751 PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16526#discussion_r1384284062