On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 09:33:54 GMT, Viktor Klang <[email protected]> wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/stream/Gatherer.java line 261:
>>
>>> 259: /**
>>> 260: * Returns an initializer which is the default initializer of a
>>> Gatherer.
>>> 261: * The returned initializer identifies that the owner Gatherer is
>>> stateless.
>>
>> I know the text is logically correct but is there a way to be more
>> intuitively correct? I mean, there are other initializers that could also
>> mean the Gather is stateless.
>
> @minborg Not really, from an evaluation-perspective only this specific
> initializer indicates true statelessness (other instances will signal that it
> is stateful even if it happens to use `null` as its state). True
> statelessness means that the initializer doesn't need to be invoked, and that
> any state does not need to be tracked.
Then it should read something that "if, and only if"
>> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/stream/Gatherer.java line 419:
>>
>>> 417: * @return the new {@code Gatherer}
>>> 418: */
>>> 419: static <T, R> Gatherer<T, Void, R> of(
>>
>> Nit: In `Collector` the parameters are formatted in a different way. Should
>> we be consistent with that existing formatting?
>
> Which parameters? The type parameters or the method parameters?
Here is an example:
static<T, A, R> Collector<T, A, R> of(Supplier<A> supplier,
BiConsumer<A, T> accumulator,
BinaryOperator<A> combiner,
Function<A, R> finisher,
Characteristics... characteristics) {
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16420#discussion_r1387941646
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16420#discussion_r1387942446
