On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 13:26:33 GMT, Vladimir Yaroslavskiy <d...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>>> Hi Paul (@PaulSandoz), Alan (@AlanBateman), Any update? Do you agree with >>> Radix sort in parallel case only? >> >> I think its definitely a better fit, but another aspect of my previous >> comment was wondering if we need a radix sort if the vectorized quicksort >> implementation is fast enough. IMO we need to compare performance results >> with the vectorized quick sort, and be aware of future enhancements to that. > > Hello @PaulSandoz and @AlanBateman ! > > Did you have time to look at the latest benchmarking? > Hello Vladimir (@iaroslavski) > > Will provide the performance data using AVX512 sort as baseline by early next > week. (Friday is a holiday for us due to Veterans Day) > > Thanks, Vamsi Nice, Vamsi! Classes for benchmarking: https://github.com/iaroslavski/sorting/blob/master/radixsort/ArraysSort.java https://github.com/iaroslavski/sorting/blob/master/radixsort/DualPivotQuicksort_RadixForParallel.java https://github.com/iaroslavski/sorting/blob/master/radixsort/DualPivotQuicksort_RadixForAll.java ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13568#issuecomment-1804341408
