core-libs-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: RFR: 8387723: Scoped memory async exceptions can be delivered inside FJP compensation code Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8387723: Scoped memory async exceptions can be delivered inside FJP compensation code Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8387723: Scoped memory async exceptions can be delivered inside FJP compensation code [v2] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8387723: Scoped memory async exceptions can be delivered inside FJP compensation code [v2] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8387723: Scoped memory async exceptions can be delivered inside FJP compensation code [v2] Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8387723: Scoped memory async exceptions can be delivered inside FJP compensation code [v2] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8387723: Scoped memory async exceptions can be delivered inside FJP compensation code [v2] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8387723: Scoped memory async exceptions can be delivered inside FJP compensation code [v3] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8387723: Scoped memory async exceptions can be delivered inside FJP compensation code [v3] Per Minborg
  • Integrated: 8387723: Scoped memory async exceptions can be delivered inside FJP compensation code Jorn Vernee
• Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value objects [v9] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value objects [v9] Chen Liang
• Re: RFR: 8383625: Throw exceptions unconditionally for some unmodifiable reversed collections views [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8383625: Throw exceptions unconditionally for some unmodifiable reversed collections views [v2] Stuart Marks
• Withdrawn: 8383625: Throw exceptions unconditionally for some unmodifiable reversed collections views duke
• Re: RFR: 8381560: AArch64: Optimize String.equals intrinsic [v3] Ehsan Behrangi
  • Re: RFR: 8381560: AArch64: Optimize String.equals intrinsic [v3] Mikhail Ablakatov
  • Re: RFR: 8381560: AArch64: Optimize String.equals intrinsic [v3] Mikhail Ablakatov
  • Re: RFR: 8381560: AArch64: Optimize String.equals intrinsic [v3] Ehsan Behrangi
• Withdrawn: 8385118: Writer.append(CharSequence) optimization duke
• Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value objects [v9] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value objects [v9] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value objects [v9] Dan Heidinga
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value objects [v9] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8317277: Java language implementation of value objects [v9] Chris Plummer
• Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v3] Sholto
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v3] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v3] Sholto
• Re: RFR: 8387324: jlink --strip-debug should filter external debug symbols [v4] Arno Zeller
• Re: RFR: 8387324: jlink --strip-debug should filter external debug symbols [v3] Arno Zeller
• RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator Robert Scholte
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v2] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v2] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v2] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v2] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v2] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v2] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v3] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v3] Brent Christian
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v3] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v3] Brent Christian
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v3] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v3] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v4] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v5] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v5] Brent Christian
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v5] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v6] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v6] Brent Christian
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v6] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v7] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v7] Brent Christian
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v7] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v7] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v7] duke
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v7] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v7] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v7] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v7] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v7] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v7] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v7] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator [v7] Guanqiang Han
  • Integrated: 8387729: Not all --long-options accept space as seperator Guanqiang Han
• Re: RFR: 8382523: Optimize Float16 to integral conversion operations for AVX512-FP16 targets [v5] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8382523: Optimize Float16 to integral conversion operations for AVX512-FP16 targets [v5] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8382523: Optimize Float16 to integral conversion operations for AVX512-FP16 targets [v5] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8382523: Optimize Float16 to integral conversion operations for AVX512-FP16 targets [v5] Jatin Bhateja
• Re: RFR: 8387213: Optimize Float16Vector.fma JIT sequence for x86 AVX512-FP16 targets Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8387213: Optimize Float16Vector.fma JIT sequence for x86 AVX512-FP16 targets Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8387213: Optimize Float16Vector.fma JIT sequence for x86 AVX512-FP16 targets [v2] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8387213: Optimize Float16Vector.fma JIT sequence for x86 AVX512-FP16 targets Sandhya Viswanathan
  • Re: RFR: 8387213: Optimize Float16Vector.fma JIT sequence for x86 AVX512-FP16 targets [v2] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8387213: Optimize Float16Vector.fma JIT sequence for x86 AVX512-FP16 targets Sandhya Viswanathan
  • Re: RFR: 8387213: Optimize Float16Vector.fma JIT sequence for x86 AVX512-FP16 targets Jatin Bhateja
• Re: RFR: 8387324: jlink --strip-debug should filter external debug symbols [v2] Arno Zeller
  • Re: RFR: 8387324: jlink --strip-debug should filter external debug symbols [v2] Severin Gehwolf
  • Re: RFR: 8387324: jlink --strip-debug should filter external debug symbols [v2] Arno Zeller
  • Re: RFR: 8387324: jlink --strip-debug should filter external debug symbols [v2] Severin Gehwolf
  • Re: RFR: 8387324: jlink --strip-debug should filter external debug symbols [v2] Arno Zeller
  • Re: RFR: 8387324: jlink --strip-debug should filter external debug symbols [v2] Severin Gehwolf
  • Re: RFR: 8387324: jlink --strip-debug should filter external debug symbols [v2] Christoph Langer
  • Re: RFR: 8387324: jlink --strip-debug should filter external debug symbols [v2] Severin Gehwolf
  • Re: RFR: 8387324: jlink --strip-debug should filter external debug symbols [v2] Arno Zeller
• RFR: 8388374: Class-File API does not enforce required validation for null matches and empty PackageEntry names Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8388374: Class-File API does not enforce required validation for null matches and empty PackageEntry names Adam Sotona
  • Re: RFR: 8388374: Class-File API does not enforce required validation for null matches and empty PackageEntry names Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8388374: Class-File API does not enforce required validation for null matches and empty PackageEntry names [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8388374: Class-File API does not enforce required validation for null matches and empty PackageEntry names [v2] Adam Sotona
  • Re: RFR: 8388374: Class-File API does not enforce required validation for null matches and empty PackageEntry names [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8388374: Class-File API does not enforce required validation for null matches and empty PackageEntry names [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8388374: Class-File API does not enforce required validation for null matches and empty PackageEntry names [v3] Adam Sotona
  • Re: RFR: 8388374: Class-File API does not enforce required validation for null matches and empty PackageEntry names [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8388374: Class-File API does not enforce required validation for null matches and empty PackageEntry names [v3] Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8388374: Class-File API does not enforce required validation for null matches and empty PackageEntry names [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8388374: Class-File API does not enforce required validation for null matches and empty PackageEntry names [v4] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8388374: Class-File API does not enforce required validation for null matches and empty PackageEntry names [v4] Adam Sotona
  • Re: RFR: 8388374: Class-File API does not enforce required validation for null matches and empty PackageEntry names [v4] Chen Liang
  • Integrated: 8388374: Class-File API does not enforce required validation for null matches and empty PackageEntry names Chen Liang
• Re: RFR: 8387812: Refine ArraysSupport.vectorizedMismatch to compare all elements [v6] Kuai Wei
  • Re: RFR: 8387812: Refine ArraysSupport.vectorizedMismatch to compare all elements [v6] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8387812: Refine ArraysSupport.vectorizedMismatch to compare all elements [v6] Kuai Wei
  • Re: RFR: 8387812: Refine ArraysSupport.vectorizedMismatch to compare all elements [v6] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8387812: Refine ArraysSupport.vectorizedMismatch to compare all elements [v6] John R Rose
  • Re: RFR: 8387812: Refine ArraysSupport.vectorizedMismatch to compare all elements [v6] Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8387812: Refine ArraysSupport.vectorizedMismatch to compare all elements [v6] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8387812: Refine ArraysSupport.vectorizedMismatch to compare all elements [v6] Kuai Wei
  • Re: RFR: 8387812: Refine ArraysSupport.vectorizedMismatch to compare all elements [v6] Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8387812: Refine ArraysSupport.vectorizedMismatch to compare all elements [v6] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8387812: Refine ArraysSupport.vectorizedMismatch to compare all elements [v6] Kuai Wei
• Re: RFR: 8376811: Implement JEP 531: Lazy Constants (Third Preview) [v28] Sergey Bylokhov
  • Re: RFR: 8376811: Implement JEP 531: Lazy Constants (Third Preview) [v28] Jorn Vernee
• Integrated: 8387745: [aot] Several tests fail because a SoftReferenceKey cannot be archived Ashutosh Mehra
• Identifying JDK value class candidates Dan Smith
  • [External] : Re: Identifying JDK value class candidates David Alayachew
  • Re: Identifying JDK value class candidates Dan Smith
  • [External] : Re: Identifying JDK value class candidates David Alayachew
  • Re: Identifying JDK value class candidates Dan Smith
  • Re: Identifying JDK value class candidates Sean Mullan
• RFR: 8388362: Class-File API MethodHandleEntry symbolic accessors do not throw IllegalArgumentException for invalid REF_newInvokeSpecial data Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8388362: Class-File API MethodHandleEntry symbolic accessors do not throw IllegalArgumentException for invalid REF_newInvokeSpecial data Adam Sotona
  • Re: RFR: 8388362: Class-File API MethodHandleEntry symbolic accessors do not throw IllegalArgumentException for invalid REF_newInvokeSpecial data [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8388362: Class-File API MethodHandleEntry symbolic accessors do not throw IllegalArgumentException for invalid REF_newInvokeSpecial data [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8388362: Class-File API MethodHandleEntry symbolic accessors do not throw IllegalArgumentException for invalid REF_newInvokeSpecial data [v3] Chen Liang
  • Integrated: 8388362: Class-File API MethodHandleEntry symbolic accessors do not throw IllegalArgumentException for invalid REF_newInvokeSpecial data Chen Liang
• RFR: 8388347: Remove enablePreview from TestEnableNativeAccessJarManifest Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8388347: Remove enablePreview from TestEnableNativeAccessJarManifest Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8388347: Remove enablePreview from TestEnableNativeAccessJarManifest Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8388347: Remove enablePreview from TestEnableNativeAccessJarManifest Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8388347: Remove enablePreview from TestEnableNativeAccessJarManifest Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8388347: Remove enablePreview from TestEnableNativeAccessJarManifest Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8388347: Remove enablePreview from TestEnableNativeAccessJarManifest Chen Liang
  • Integrated: 8388347: Remove enablePreview from TestEnableNativeAccessJarManifest Chen Liang
• Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v105] Doug Lea
• Re: RFR: 8387261: Locale.LanguageRange weight validation issues [v7] Justin Lu
• Integrated: 8387261: Locale.LanguageRange weight validation issues Justin Lu
• Integrated: 8388183: Wrong example in documentation for String.toLowerCase() Naoto Sato
• Re: RFR: 8388183: Wrong example in documentation for String.toLowerCase() Naoto Sato
• Re: RFR: 8387324: jlink --strip-debug should filter external debug symbols Severin Gehwolf
  • Re: RFR: 8387324: jlink --strip-debug should filter external debug symbols [v5] Severin Gehwolf
• RFR: 8387753: Improve SimpleDateFormat.set2DigitYearStart() documentation Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8387753: Improve SimpleDateFormat.set2DigitYearStart() documentation Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8387753: Improve SimpleDateFormat.set2DigitYearStart() documentation Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8387753: Improve SimpleDateFormat.set2DigitYearStart() documentation [v2] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8387753: Improve SimpleDateFormat.set2DigitYearStart() documentation [v2] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8387753: Improve SimpleDateFormat.set2DigitYearStart() documentation [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8387753: Improve SimpleDateFormat.set2DigitYearStart() documentation [v2] Volkan Yazici
  • Integrated: 8387753: Improve SimpleDateFormat.set2DigitYearStart() documentation Volkan Yazici
• Re: RFR: 8384571: C2: Add some basic IGVN optimization for VectorBlendNode Eric Fang
• Re: RFR: 8384571: C2: Add some basic IGVN optimization for VectorBlendNode [v2] Eric Fang
  • Re: RFR: 8384571: C2: Add some basic IGVN optimization for VectorBlendNode [v2] Eric Fang
• Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v2] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v2] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v2] Guanqiang Han
• Re: RFR: 8387812: Refine ArraysSupport.vectorizedMismatch to compare all elements [v5] Kuai Wei
  • Re: RFR: 8387812: Refine ArraysSupport.vectorizedMismatch to compare all elements [v5] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8387812: Refine ArraysSupport.vectorizedMismatch to compare all elements [v5] Kuai Wei
• Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Benjamin Peterson
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Tobias Hartmann
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Benjamin Peterson
  • Re: RFR: 8317278: JVM implementation of value objects [v9] Tobias Hartmann
• Re: RFR: 8387745: [aot] Several tests fail because a SoftReferenceKey cannot be archived Ashutosh Mehra
  • Re: RFR: 8387745: [aot] Several tests fail because a SoftReferenceKey cannot be archived Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8387745: [aot] Several tests fail because a SoftReferenceKey cannot be archived Vladimir Kozlov
• Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v3] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v3] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v3] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v3] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v3] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v3] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v3] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8387750: 'java -XshowSettings' alone should not be an error [v3] Guanqiang Han
• Re: RFR: 8317279: Standard library implementation of value classes and objects [v9] Chen Liang
• Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v10] Sholto
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v10] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v10] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v10] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v10] Sholto
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v10] Sholto
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v10] Sholto
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v10] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v10] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v10] Sholto
• Re: RFR: 8272194: java.sql.Date::toLocalDate() broken for dates before 1 A.D. [v9] Sholto

• Later messages