core-libs-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: RFR: 8381233: Linker does not need to be value based class [v2] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8381233: Linker does not need to be value based class [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8381233: Linker does not need to be value based class [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8381233: Linker does not need to be value based class [v2] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8381233: Linker does not need to be value based class [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8381233: Linker does not need to be value based class [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8381233: Linker does not need to be value based class [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8381233: Linker does not need to be value based class [v2] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Integrated: 8381233: Linker does not need to be value based class Yasumasa Suenaga
• Re: RFR: 8380634: [macos] MacOS versions cannot start with 0 [v2] Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8380634: [macos] MacOS versions cannot start with 0 [v2] Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8380634: [macos] MacOS versions cannot start with 0 [v2] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8380634: [macos] Remove macOS version restrictions on start with zero and limit to three components [v2] Alexander Matveev
• Re: RFR: 8273874: LdapClient can trigger memory leak [v3] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8273874: LdapClient can trigger memory leak [v3] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8273874: LdapClient can trigger memory leak [v3] Jaikiran Pai
• Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v7] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v7] David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v7] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v7] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v7] David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v7] David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v7] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v7] David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v7] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v7] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v7] David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v7] David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v7] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v7] David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v7] David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v7] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v7] David Beaumont
  • Re: RFR: 8377070: Migrate preview mode support for jimage to mainline [v7] David Beaumont
• Re: RFR: 8374202: Simplify significand normalization in BigDecimal(double, MathContext) constructor Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8374202: Simplify significand normalization in BigDecimal(double, MathContext) constructor Daisuke Yamazaki
  • Re: RFR: 8374202: Simplify significand normalization in BigDecimal(double, MathContext) constructor duke
• Integrated: 8380956: HexFormat shoud have @ValueBased Yasumasa Suenaga
• JEP draft: HTTP over Unix Domain Sockets Michael McMahon
  • [External] : Re: JEP draft: HTTP over Unix Domain Sockets Florian Weimer
• Re: RFR: 8378737: AArch64: Fix SVE match rule issues for VectorMask.andNot() [v2] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8378737: AArch64: Fix SVE match rule issues for VectorMask.andNot() [v2] Xiaohong Gong
  • Re: RFR: 8378737: AArch64: Fix SVE match rule issues for VectorMask.andNot() [v2] Andrew Haley
  • Re: RFR: 8378737: AArch64: Fix SVE match rule issues for VectorMask.andNot() [v2] Xiaohong Gong
  • Re: RFR: 8378737: AArch64: Fix SVE match rule issues for VectorMask.andNot() [v2] Andrew Haley
  • Re: RFR: 8378737: AArch64: Fix SVE match rule issues for VectorMask.andNot() [v2] Xiaohong Gong
  • Re: RFR: 8378737: AArch64: Fix SVE match rule issues for VectorMask.andNot() [v2] Andrew Haley
  • Re: RFR: 8378737: AArch64: Fix SVE match rule issues for VectorMask.andNot() [v2] Xiaohong Gong
  • Re: RFR: 8378737: AArch64: Fix SVE match rule issues for VectorMask.andNot() [v2] Andrew Haley
  • Re: RFR: 8378737: AArch64: Fix SVE match rule issues for VectorMask.andNot() [v2] Xiaohong Gong
  • Re: RFR: 8378737: AArch64: Fix SVE match rule issues for VectorMask.andNot() [v2] Xiaohong Gong
  • Re: RFR: 8378737: AArch64: Fix SVE match rule issues for VectorMask.andNot() [v2] Xiaohong Gong
  • Re: RFR: 8378737: AArch64: Fix SVE match rule issues for VectorMask.andNot() [v2] Jaromir Hamala
  • Re: RFR: 8378737: AArch64: Fix SVE match rule issues for VectorMask.andNot() [v2] Xiaohong Gong
• [External] : weakly consistent iterators spec seems misleading? Yagnatinsky, Mark
  • Re: [External] : weakly consistent iterators spec seems misleading? Viktor Klang
  • RE: [External] : weakly consistent iterators spec seems misleading? Yagnatinsky, Mark
  • Re: [External] : weakly consistent iterators spec seems misleading? Viktor Klang
  • RE: [External] : weakly consistent iterators spec seems misleading? Yagnatinsky, Mark
  • Re: [External] : weakly consistent iterators spec seems misleading? Viktor Klang
  • RE: [External] : weakly consistent iterators spec seems misleading? Yagnatinsky, Mark
  • Re: [External] : weakly consistent iterators spec seems misleading? Viktor Klang
  • RE: [External] : weakly consistent iterators spec seems misleading? Yagnatinsky, Mark
  • Re: [External] : weakly consistent iterators spec seems misleading? Viktor Klang
  • RE: [External] : weakly consistent iterators spec seems misleading? Yagnatinsky, Mark
• Integrated: 8378295: Update scalar AVX10 floating point min/max definitions Mohamed Issa
• Re: RFR: 8367761: [VectorAPI] AssertionError with several vector API mathlib tests with MaxVectorSize=32 Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8367761: [VectorAPI] AssertionError with several vector API mathlib tests with MaxVectorSize=32 Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8367761: [VectorAPI] AssertionError with several vector API mathlib tests with MaxVectorSize=32 Sandhya Viswanathan
  • Re: RFR: 8367761: [VectorAPI] AssertionError with several vector API mathlib tests with MaxVectorSize=32 Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8367761: [VectorAPI] AssertionError with several vector API mathlib tests with MaxVectorSize=32 Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8367761: [VectorAPI] AssertionError with several vector API mathlib tests with MaxVectorSize=32 Sandhya Viswanathan
  • Re: RFR: 8367761: [VectorAPI] AssertionError with several vector API mathlib tests with MaxVectorSize=32 Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8367761: [VectorAPI] AssertionError with several vector API mathlib tests with MaxVectorSize=32 Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8367761: [VectorAPI] AssertionError with several vector API mathlib tests with MaxVectorSize=32 Vladimir Ivanov
  • Re: RFR: 8367761: [VectorAPI] AssertionError with several vector API mathlib tests with MaxVectorSize=32 Vladimir Ivanov
• Re: RFR: 8380076: Refactor accessFlags() parsing in core reflection [v2] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8380076: Refactor accessFlags() parsing in core reflection [v2] Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8380076: Refactor accessFlags() parsing in core reflection [v2] Chen Liang
• Re: RFR: 8378295: Update scalar AVX10 floating point min/max definitions [v6] Mohamed Issa
  • Re: RFR: 8378295: Update scalar AVX10 floating point min/max definitions [v6] duke
• Re: RFR: 8380915: Cleanup some Java declarations of the Vector API [v2] Chen Liang
• Integrated: 8380915: Cleanup some Java declarations of the Vector API Chen Liang
• Integrated: 8230421: Java cannot handle Euro sign at the Simplified Chinese Windows Command Prompt Naoto Sato
• Re: RFR: 8230421: Java cannot handle Euro sign at the Simplified Chinese Windows Command Prompt Naoto Sato
• Integrated: 8380671: Refactor BasicFloat16ArithTests.java Joe Darcy
• Re: RFR: 8380671: Refactor BasicFloat16ArithTests.java [v2] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8380671: Refactor BasicFloat16ArithTests.java [v2] Brian Burkhalter
• Re: RFR: 8380452: ZipOutputStream::putNextEntry(ZipEntry) throws unspecified IllegalArgumentException for unmappable entry name [v8] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8380452: ZipOutputStream::putNextEntry(ZipEntry) throws unspecified IllegalArgumentException for unmappable entry name [v8] Eirik Bjørsnøs
  • Re: RFR: 8380452: ZipOutputStream::putNextEntry(ZipEntry) throws unspecified IllegalArgumentException for unmappable entry name [v8] Eirik Bjørsnøs
  • Re: RFR: 8380452: ZipOutputStream::putNextEntry(ZipEntry) throws unspecified IllegalArgumentException for unmappable entry name [v8] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8380452: ZipOutputStream::putNextEntry(ZipEntry) throws unspecified IllegalArgumentException for unmappable entry name [v8] Eirik Bjørsnøs
• Re: RFR: 8380671: Refactor BasicFloat16ArithTests.java Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8380671: Refactor BasicFloat16ArithTests.java Brian Burkhalter
  • Re: RFR: 8380671: Refactor BasicFloat16ArithTests.java [v2] Joe Darcy
• Re: RFR: 8378295: Update scalar AVX10 floating point min/max definitions [v5] Jatin Bhateja
  • Re: RFR: 8378295: Update scalar AVX10 floating point min/max definitions [v5] Srinivas Vamsi Parasa
• Re: RFR: 8373554: Improve performance of Thread.setName() SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8373554: Improve performance of Thread.setName() SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8373554: Improve performance of Thread.setName() Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8373554: Improve performance of Thread.setName() [v2] Roman Kennke
• RFR: 8380968: classfile package doc mentions nonexistent UtfEntry Benjamin Peterson
  • Re: RFR: 8380968: classfile package doc mentions nonexistent UtfEntry Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8380968: classfile package doc mentions nonexistent UtfEntry [v2] Benjamin Peterson
  • Re: RFR: 8380968: classfile package doc mentions nonexistent UtfEntry [v2] Benjamin Peterson
  • Re: RFR: 8380968: classfile package doc mentions nonexistent UtfEntry [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8380968: classfile package doc mentions nonexistent UtfEntry [v2] Chen Liang
  • Integrated: 8380968: classfile package doc mentions nonexistent UtfEntry Benjamin Peterson
• RFR: 8380960: "Foreign function access" discussion links to wrong downcallHandle overload Benjamin Peterson
  • Re: RFR: 8380960: "Foreign function access" discussion links to wrong downcallHandle overload Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8380960: "Foreign function access" discussion links to wrong downcallHandle overload [v2] Benjamin Peterson
  • Re: RFR: 8380960: "Foreign function access" discussion links to wrong downcallHandle overload [v2] duke
  • Re: RFR: 8380960: "Foreign function access" discussion links to wrong downcallHandle overload [v2] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Integrated: 8380960: "Foreign function access" discussion links to wrong downcallHandle overload Benjamin Peterson
• Re: RFR: 8375631: VectorAPI part number: reformulate documentation and improve exception message [v4] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8375631: VectorAPI part number: reformulate documentation and improve exception message [v4] Paul Sandoz
  • Re: RFR: 8375631: VectorAPI part number: reformulate documentation and improve exception message [v4] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8375631: VectorAPI part number: reformulate documentation and improve exception message [v4] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8375631: VectorAPI part number: reformulate documentation and improve exception message [v4] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8375631: VectorAPI part number: reformulate documentation and improve exception message [v4] Paul Sandoz
  • Re: RFR: 8375631: VectorAPI part number: reformulate documentation and improve exception message [v4] Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8375631: VectorAPI part number: reformulate documentation and improve exception message [v4] Paul Sandoz
  • Re: RFR: 8375631: VectorAPI part number: reformulate documentation and improve exception message [v4] Paul Sandoz
  • Re: RFR: 8375631: VectorAPI part number: reformulate documentation and improve exception message [v4] Emanuel Peter
• Re: RFR: 8376811: Implement JEP 531: Lazy Constants (Third Preview) [v11] Per Minborg
• Re: RFR: 8380956: HexFormat shoud have @ValueBased Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8380956: HexFormat shoud have @ValueBased Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8380956: HexFormat shoud have @ValueBased Thomas Stuefe
  • Re: RFR: 8380956: HexFormat shoud have @ValueBased Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8380956: HexFormat shoud have @ValueBased Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8380956: HexFormat shoud have @ValueBased Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8380956: HexFormat shoud have @ValueBased Alan Bateman
• RFR: 8379679: java/foreign/TestConcurrentClose.java awaitTermination times out on Windows debug builds Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8379679: java/foreign/TestConcurrentClose.java awaitTermination times out on Windows debug builds Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8379679: java/foreign/TestConcurrentClose.java awaitTermination times out on Windows debug builds Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8379679: java/foreign/TestConcurrentClose.java awaitTermination times out on Windows debug builds [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8379679: java/foreign/TestConcurrentClose.java awaitTermination times out on Windows debug builds [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8379679: java/foreign/TestConcurrentClose.java awaitTermination times out on Windows debug builds [v2] Chen Liang
  • Integrated: 8379679: java/foreign/TestConcurrentClose.java awaitTermination times out on Windows debug builds Chen Liang
• Re: RFR: 8375631: VectorAPI part number: reformulate documentation and improve exception message Emanuel Peter
• Re: RFR: 8375631: VectorAPI part number: reformulate documentation and improve exception message [v3] Emanuel Peter
• Re: RFR: 8375631: VectorAPI part number: reformulate documentation and improve exception message [v2] Emanuel Peter
• RFR: 8380990: Update testng and junit tests to use diagnoseConfigurationIssue() method and post processing serhiysachkov
  • Re: RFR: 8380990: Update testng and junit tests to use diagnoseConfigurationIssue() method and post processing [v2] serhiysachkov
  • Re: RFR: 8380990: Update testng and junit tests to use diagnoseConfigurationIssue() method and post processing [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8380990: Update testng and junit tests to use diagnoseConfigurationIssue() method and post processing [v3] serhiysachkov
  • Re: RFR: 8380990: Update testng and junit tests to use diagnoseConfigurationIssue() method and post processing [v4] serhiysachkov
  • Re: RFR: 8380990: Update testng and junit tests to use diagnoseConfigurationIssue() method and post processing [v4] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8380990: Update testng and junit tests to use diagnoseConfigurationIssue() method and post processing [v4] serhiysachkov
  • Re: RFR: 8380990: Update testng and junit tests to use diagnoseConfigurationIssue() method and post processing [v4] Christian Stein
  • Re: RFR: 8380990: Update testng and junit tests to use diagnoseConfigurationIssue() method and post processing [v4] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8380990: Update testng and junit tests to use diagnoseConfigurationIssue() method and post processing [v5] serhiysachkov
  • Re: RFR: 8380990: Update testng and junit tests to use diagnoseConfigurationIssue() method and post processing [v5] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8380990: Update testng and junit tests to use diagnoseConfigurationIssue() method and post processing [v5] serhiysachkov
  • Re: RFR: 8380990: Update testng and junit tests to use diagnoseConfigurationIssue() method and post processing [v6] serhiysachkov
  • Re: RFR: 8380990: Update testng and junit tests to use diagnoseConfigurationIssue() method and post processing [v7] serhiysachkov
  • Re: RFR: 8380990: Update testng and junit tests to use diagnoseConfigurationIssue() method and post processing [v7] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8380990: Update testng and junit tests to use diagnoseConfigurationIssue() method and post processing [v7] serhiysachkov
  • Re: RFR: 8380990: Update testng and junit tests to use diagnoseConfigurationIssue() method and post processing [v8] serhiysachkov
  • Re: RFR: 8380990: Update testng and junit tests to use diagnoseConfigurationIssue() method and post processing [v8] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8380990: Update testng and junit tests to use diagnoseConfigurationIssue() method and post processing [v8] duke
  • Integrated: 8380990: Update testng and junit tests to use diagnoseConfigurationIssue() method and post processing serhiysachkov
• Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v63] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v63] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v63] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v63] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v63] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v63] Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v63] Viktor Klang
• Re: RFR: 8380074: Reflection::areNestMates should be replaced by Class::isNestmateOf [v2] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8380074: Reflection::areNestMates should be replaced by Class::isNestmateOf [v2] Chen Liang
• Re: RFR: 8380634: [macos] MacOS versions cannot start with 0 Nir Lisker
• Integrated: 8380764: Vector classes should have @ValueBased Yasumasa Suenaga
• Re: RFR: 8380764: Vector classes should have @ValueBased Yasumasa Suenaga
• RFR: 8380288: The test java/util/TimeZone/CustomTzIDCheckDST.java does fail on AIX after JDK-8375045 Arno Zeller
  • Re: RFR: 8380288: The test java/util/TimeZone/CustomTzIDCheckDST.java does fail on AIX after JDK-8375045 Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8380288: The test java/util/TimeZone/CustomTzIDCheckDST.java does fail on AIX after JDK-8375045 Martin Doerr
  • Re: RFR: 8380288: [BACKOUT] Incorrect Interpretation of POSIX TZ Environment Variable on AIX Arno Zeller
  • Re: RFR: 8380288: [BACKOUT] Incorrect Interpretation of POSIX TZ Environment Variable on AIX duke
  • Integrated: 8380288: [BACKOUT] Incorrect Interpretation of POSIX TZ Environment Variable on AIX Arno Zeller
• Re: RFR: 8380074: Reflection::areNestMates should be replaced by Class::isNestmateOf David Holmes
• RFR: 8380955: Value-based classes in FFM should have @ValueBased Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8380955: Value-based classes in FFM should have @ValueBased Per Minborg
  • Re: RFR: 8380955: Value-based classes in FFM should have @ValueBased Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8380955: Value-based classes in FFM should have @ValueBased Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8380955: Value-based classes in FFM should have @ValueBased Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8380955: Value-based classes in FFM should have @ValueBased ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8380955: Value-based classes in FFM should have @ValueBased Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8380955: Value-based classes in FFM should have @ValueBased Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8380955: Value-based classes in FFM should have @ValueBased Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8380955: Value-based classes in FFM should have @ValueBased Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8380955: Value-based classes in FFM should have @ValueBased Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8380955: Value-based classes in FFM should have @ValueBased [v2] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8380955: Value-based classes in FFM should have @ValueBased [v2] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8380955: Value-based classes in FFM should have @ValueBased [v3] Yasumasa Suenaga
  • Re: RFR: 8380955: Value-based classes in FFM should have @ValueBased [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8380955: Value-based classes in FFM should have @ValueBased [v3] Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: RFR: 8380955: Value-based classes in FFM should have @ValueBased [v3] Per Minborg
  • Integrated: 8380955: Value-based classes in FFM should have @ValueBased Yasumasa Suenaga

• Later messages